Wilcock begins by discussing his experience in Hollywood film production, and sharing how difficult it is to be successful in this industry. As he describes, most Hollywood productions end up loosing significantly with regard to overall profit. This may have been one of the reasons why the Illuminati/cabal launch their extended P.R. campaign within the world of film and entertainment. It is this reasoning which we intend to discuss, along with the various results of this campaign within media. We start things off with further revelations from the previously discussed, Sony hacks.
Sony Hacks Abound
In my view, this episode revealed some of the most amazing evidence of government manipulation in media to date. In the last few discussions, the series covered the connection between the Rand Corporation and Sony as well as numerous other media companies which are controlled by the military-industrial complex.
Within this discussion, we are actually able to read the evidence in the form of email correspondents from Sony regarding the creation of various media productions. Before we get into that subject, however, we will learn just what these emails represent. For these details we turn to two websites. The first of these comes from the site of the well-known publisher, Variety.
WikiLeaks made the announcement Thursday in a posting on its Twitter account.
The move came two weeks after WikiLeaks disclosed that it had published 30,287 documents and 173,132 emails stemming from last winter’s cyber-attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment. WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange said in an April 16 statement that information was newsworthy, adding, “It belongs in the public domain. WikiLeaks will ensure it stays there.”
The hack was reportedly initiated by North Korea in response to the studio’s decision to release the comedy “The Interview,” centering on an assassination attempt on North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. As a result, embarrassing correspondence between top executives and producers became public and helped lead to the ouster of studio chief Amy Pascal and her being replaced by TriStar chief Tom Rothman.
Sony Pictures strongly opposed the release of the material in an April 16 statement: “We vehemently disagree with WikiLeaks’ assertion that this material belongs in the public domain and will continue to fight for the safety, security and privacy of our company and its more than 6,000 employees.”
The April 16 disclosure by WikiLeaks included the revelation that Ben Affleck had attempted to conceal his slave-owning ancestors from the PBS documentary series “Finding Your Roots.” Affleck subsequently apologized for having having done so.
WikiLeaks reveals Sony’s hidden ties to Washington
“The Sony Archives show that behind the scenes this is an influential corporation, with ties to the White House (there are almost 100 U.S. government email addresses in the archive), with an ability to impact laws and policies, and with connections to the US military-industrial complex,” WikiLeaks said.According to WikiLeaks, Sony Pictures’ CEO Michael Lynton is on the board of trustees of the RAND Corporation, which the whistleblower website described as “an organization specializing in research and development for the United States military and intelligence sector”.WikiLeaks said its newly released trove of documents brings to light the “flow of contacts and information” between Sony’s US subsidiary and RAND. This ranges from Sony setting up celebrity visits to special events for the military research company, to RAND offering advice to Sony Pictures on how to handle blowback from North Korea over the film, The Interview.In total, the trove includes more than 30,000 documents, collectively dubbed by WikiLeaks as “The Sony Archives”. The documents were first leaked online late last year by hackers.
Following this article, David Wilcock makes the point that this information shows a situation which is completely contrary to what media is supposed to be. When we watch television or movies, many of us expect to be watching nothing more than pure entertainment. However, this information from Wikileaks tells a completely different story. Here we see the that Michael Lynton, the CEO of Sony, is on the board of trusties of the Rand Corporation.
As Wilcock states, this situation basically represents monopolization of media, and flies in the face of virtually every antitrust law that has ever been written. As many may know, anti-trust laws exist to insure that all businesses operate under clear and fair standards which are most beneficial to the consumer. However, this is most definitely not what Sony and Rand seemed to have in mind. It is this situation between these colluding corporations which can easily be defined as crime, and it is more than likely that the criminal nature of these actions is the true reason why Sony “vehemently disagrees with WikiLeaks’ assertion” regarding the need for public oversight of such activities.
It is clear that Sony did not want this information which Wikileaks acquired to be made public. They give the reason that it is a violation of privacy. However, this is not likely the only reason behind the objection. It is a given that a criminal (or criminal organization) will not typically reveal their own guilt if they intend to continue their criminal behavior.
In order to investigate any crime, private information must be examined, and any functional criminal justice system with integrity to speak of will thoroughly examine such situations in order to determine if crime has been committed. However, this did not seem to be the situation at the time these hacks came to the surface. This is why the hacks and Wikileaks revelations were necessary. Justice was not being served, and the very system charged with handling the would-be investigation was showing to be an accessory to the crime itself.
Taking a Closer Look
Up until this point, we have only been able to speak on the possibility of foul play within the collusion between Rand and Sony. Though that possibility was known to be very strong (given the amount of propaganda we have clearly been able to see) it was only partially proven. However, the details within these Sony emails may dispel all doubt that crime has taken place. Here is Wikileaks on the subject.
RAND’s Politics Aside – A Can’t Miss Experience in Santa MonicaRAND’s Politics Aside – A Can’t Miss Experience in Santa Monica | RANDRAND’s Politics Aside – A Can’t Miss Experience in Santa Monica | view in browserWe’re pleased to have the current director of the NSA join us for what will be a dynamic day of discussions.Admiral Michael S. RogersCommander of U.S. Cyber Command and Director of the National Security Agency/
Central Security ServiceVisit our website to see a full list of the other speakers who will be joining us. The number of participants is limited. Purchase your passes today!#PoliticsAsideA portion of the cost of each pass is a tax-deductible contribution to RAND.
Your participation in Politics Aside helps support RAND research.sponsored by:RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest.RAND Corporation. 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401-3208.
RAND® is a registered trademark.Privacy statement | Email email@example.com to unsubscribe.
This doesn’t at all look like business as usual for any company who produces simple entertainment. Upon seeing this email, many are probably curious as to why one of the largest entertainment companies in the country is meeting with the NSA (the agency we all know to be guilty of spying on a good majority of the planet) for an entire day.
We can clearly see propagandistic films and media such as The Interview produce by Sony, as well as numerous other sources. Combine this knowledge with the fact that Sony is likely gathering information from the NSA as well, and we have a multi-level collusion in media for the sake of manipulating the common population with strategic precision. As David Wilcock state, the profitability of a media company has nothing to do with spying unless there are clear ulterior motives which these media companies hold.
Wilcock goes on to explain that there are virtually no Hollywood productions which oppose the cabal in any way. When we think of such revealing movies as Andrew Wakefield’s Vaxxed, orAmy Berg’s An Open Secret (which respectively document the the dangers of unchecked vaccine manufacturers, and the epidemic of pedophilia in Hollywood), and how these films seemed to fall flat, it becomes clear that films which oppose the cabal/Illuminati never make it to the big screen in Hollywood. This is not accidental, but by design. It is a monopolization of the industry much like we see in every profitable industry the cabal controls. In short, those who have opposed them tend to fail, while those who conspire with them tend to succeed.
Let’s take a look at another email. Here we have evident correspondents between Sony and the Rand Corporation on the exact subject of changing journalistic publications to the advantage of government image.
FW: Snowden Final DRAFTFrom: Weil, Leah
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:00 PM
To: Guerin, Jean
Cc: Klein, Megan; Kaplan, Todd; Sipkins, Charles
Subject: RE: Snowden Final DRAFTPrivileged and ConfidentialJean – a few comments1. In the first sentence of the second paragraph – delete the phrase “illegal spying” and either leave it simply as “operations” or replace it with “intelligence gathering” – so the clause would read “U.S. government’s intelligence gathering operations.”2. In the second sentence of the second paragraph – delete the phrase “misuse of power” and replace it with “actions” or “activities” so that it would read “the NSA’s actions” or “the NSA’s activities”I wonder in his quote whether we want to have him say it is a “political film”. That’s really more of a PR point so up to you guys – and I suspect since it is his own quote Greenwald will feel strongly.Please also ensure that the use of quotes from the reviews is an accurate portrayal of what was said. Because they are excerpts we want to make sure that there is no change in the meaning etc. and that the attributions are correct.From: Guerin, Jean
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Weil, Leah
Cc: Klein, Megan; Kaplan, Todd
Subject: Snowden Final DRAFTHi Leah, We thought you might want to review attached before it goes out to the media. Greenwald has been given creative input on this release – as a matter of fact, it cannot go out without his final approval. Please let us know what you think. Ideally as Greenwald is on a world press tour right now, we’d like to announce this afternoon or early tomorrow morning.Thanks as always, Jean
We can see that this email was sent from personnel at Rand, and is advising Sony on an article on Edward Snowden’s revelations. This person at Rand is basically dictating to Sony how to best give the NSA a positive image in the eyes of the reader–basically fashioning the opinions of the public for private interests.
As Wilcock points out, there is not supposed to be a hierarchical arrangement which links government, military, and entertainment together. What do the results of the ‘Nation Spying Agency’ have to do with Hollywood production and publications? In my view, this is downright Orwellian, and has no place within a country which boasts the statutes of freedom and equality. If people aren’t even allowed to think for themselves without being unknowingly manipulated by the entertainment industry, I can hardly consider such a situation “free”.
We see the Rand Corporation and the NSA basically using Sony as their own personal advertisement agency as they dictate Sony’s publications to them. These emails prove that the military-industrial complex is manipulating and censoring journalism, the news, and numerous other avenues of the entertainment industry.
(David Wilcock makes a note that he appreciates Gaia because he can say whatever he wants on the network. He also says that in sharing all of the secrets of Hollywood and the mainstream, he will most likely never be able to work there again.)
At this point, we’ve proven that Sony Entertainment is taking orders from the NSA and the Rand Corporation, but what exactly is this salvage plan of the cabal’s mentioned in the title?
More Schemes from the Mainstream
It has been discussed in past weeks that the cabal has been slowly dissemination their own version of reality to the public. This is so that if they find their situation deteriorating to the point of imminent defeat, they can use their partial-disclosure script to distract the public and cast themselves in a positive light–changing the story to their own advantage.
On this subject of disclosure in the Wisdom Teachings series, the cabal’s numerous nuggets of truth have been various in scope and significance. In contrast, this episode showed that the cabal is leaving little to the imagination for anyone who is paying attention.
The next disclosure of interest comes to us from the website, Gizmodo.com, and discusses the exotic technology of cloaking devices.
We’ve Just Developed a Portable Cloakig DeviceIf you’re a non-magical being, you might think your chances of becoming invisible are slim to nil. But don’t jump to conclusions just yet: Researchers are now claiming to have developed a portable system that can make small objects, like your keys or pet lizard, disappear from sight.The key to real life invisibility lies in clever optical tricks that bend light around an object, shielding it from detection. In principle, such technology has only been demonstrated for very tiny objects, but now, a group of researchers from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology say they’ve developed a scaled-up system that can be ported around and used for classroom demonstrations.When the KIT researchers want to cloak an object, they place it inside a hollow metal cylinder coated with acrylic paint, which diffusely reflects light. That metal tube is then embedded inside a light-scattering PDMS block. If the time it takes light to travel through the block is just the right proportion of the time it takes light to travel through the cloak, the cloak becomes invisible. Or so the researchers say—the first actual demonstration of this technology will take place on May 13th, according to a press release.
As Gizmodo reveals, scientists “just” developed a technology which has the ability to bend light around objects so that they become invisible. However, as we have heard, this technology is not at all limited to small objects within metal tubes.
Wilcock explains the likelihood that this technology exists on a grand scale, and that the ships we hear of within the Secret Space Program commonly use this cloaking technology to mask their operations from view. He tells of how there could be major thoroughfares in the sky full of ships and we would not be able to tell. It may be that the cabal is pushing this information of cloaking technology out to the mainstream so as to prime the public for their PR salvage plan.
The discussion moves to the Avengers movie series, and how this series seems to have numerous soft disclosures of the various technologies the cabal possesses. David Wilcock mentions the testimonies of Dr. Pete Peterson on how the floating aircraft carrier depicted in these movies was almost exactly the way the actual carrier appears. It is very likely that this cloaking technology is used to mask these carriers despite their massive size, according to Wilcock.