DRUG CARTEL TAKE-DOWN: Why is the U.S. Attacking the Drug Epidemic During the COVID-19 Outbreak?

CULIACAN MEXICO - Attack

The fact is clear. Right now, countless Americans and people around the world are feeling confused, angry, and somewhat fearful about the present global situation. The effects of this reported Coronavirus have been cycled throughout mainstream news for several months now, and there is no telling when the apparent threat of this virus will pass.

Yet with the reported success of the various measures now being taken to treat the virus (such as hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin), there does seem to be hope for many of those suffering from this illness.

Still, citizens grow ever more anxious for the COVID-19 threat to pass so that everyone can get back to their lives. At present, we find ourselves asking why there has been such an extreme response to an illness that statistically has a lower death toll than the common flu. Why has the overall response to this outbreak been so excessive compared to other past or present health threats? And why does it seem like the media is manipulating the narrative to stoke fear while refusing to report the high success rate of the COVID-19 treatment?

We can’t come to any definite answers just yet but we do know that at this point, there could be a very substantial reason for the majority of citizens (both in the U.S. and abroad) to remain in their homes at this time.

Recent official disclosures, mainstream news reports, and independent sources suggest that a very large and pending indictment/arrest operation could be looming for the entire continental United States and several other developed countries. Data from the Department of Justice, reports from the White House, and military briefings by the joint chiefs of staff have each communicated the fact that numerous military operations would be underway within a short period of time. (Some have already begun, as of the writing of this article.)

Depending upon the source of these reports, the targets of these military and legal operations tend to vary in focus. However, in general, it appears that numerous terrorist organizations, drug cartels, and possibly hundreds (if not thousands) of Deep State operatives could be slated for arrests and prosecution. Yet why would these pending actions require the population to remain in their homes? If Deep State criminals were the target of these legal and military operations, why should their arrest restrict the movement of the citizenry?

The answer is actually very simple.

Steps Toward Mass Arrests

If a mass-arrest scenario of Deep State interests is, in fact, imminent, it may be the largest joint military operation the world has ever seen. There has never been an arrest operation as large as those reportedly planned by U.S. authorities (along with military forces from around the world). The reason these joint military forces (commonly known as the Alliance) are planning such a large-scale event is that the powers they are opposing have been so violent and troublesome in the past.

In other words, the criminal interests in the cross-hairs of these arrest operations are so influential and resourceful that they may actually resist these military arrest operations with their own military-style countermeasures. In fact, according to reports, this is the exact situation.

REPORT: Trump Admin Deploys Military to Block Drug Cartels from Infiltrating US During Pandemic

Those who have been responsibly researching these topics will have likely come across the well-known source we know as Q-Anon. This is a knowledge base that challenges citizen journalists to do their due diligence and to research beyond the typical media talking points to find the true story. It basically teaches responsible adults to be their own journalist and to discern truth from fiction in nearly any situation.

Some questionable parties have done their best to smear this source of journalistic knowledge, but these smear-artists only continue to fail with empty ad-hominem attacks. Q is not seen as a person or a figure of admiration for anyone that takes it seriously. Instead, this source is merely a means for the average person to gain self-empowerment through journalistic-education and diligent investigation. But back to the subject of interest.

There was a significant Q post from February of 2018 which seems to directly pertain to our present situation. The following excerpt comes from post 725 and focuses on the preliminary actions that need to take place before any mass arrest operations can occur.

“Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.”

— Q

If we consider the past several months, we’ll notice that many of these developments have already transpired. We’ve watched on mainstream news as numerous D.C. officials resigned and stepped down from their positions of influence. We’ve seen the narrative of the fake-news media shift (somewhat) from one that unconditionally smears the president and criticized the foundation of the United States to one that appreciates the country and the efforts the president is making on a daily basis.

We have seen ISIS destroyed even to the point where any would-be terrorist leader is neutralized the moment they attempt to cause violence. Here in the States, we’ve also seen the deportation of MS13 through executive order and tightening of border security. (No thanks to the Deep State media which has tried endlessly to prevent the deportation of this violent drug cartel claiming that it was racist to deport convicted murderers, rapists, and traffickers.) And as things appear, we are about to witness the completion of these preliminary operations through the recent White House initiative to eliminate drug cartels from American borders and coasts.

The original Q post also addresses the U.S.’s achievements in North Korea by President Trump and White House officials. These actions led to significant disarmament of the N.K. military and a number of steps that would ensure the end of Deep State control over the Korean peninsula.

The above Q post goes on to describe the significance of these actions in North Korea as part of a larger effort to disarm all Deep State assets around the world prior to the impending arrests. The Q-team stresses the necessity of completing these steps before the final arrest operations commence. The team also suggests that any attempt to initiate arrests prior to neutralizing these countermeasures could pose a significant threat to the general public.

MASS ARRESTS: US Executes Nationwide Arrest Operations against the ‘Remorseless’ CJNG Cartel

What kind of threat, you might ask? As previously stated, the answer is simple. In fact, we have seen a scenario just like this in the recent past in which a high-profile target was pursued by authorities without the proper preliminary steps being taken to ensure the safety of the public.

Below is a report about the recent attempt by Mexican authorities to arrest one of the leaders of the notorious, Sinaloa drug cartel, Ovidio Guzman (son of the notorious, El Chapo). These events were extremely significant, and yet they received very little attention from American mainstream news.

* * * * *

Source: Medium

Published: October 19, 2019

By: Shameen Yakubu

What Just Happened In Mexico? The Disaster of Culiacan

On Thursday afternoon, October 17, one of the biggest stories in the ongoing saga of the Mexican Drug War occurred.

That day in the city of Culiacan in Sinaloa, police and soldiers from the Mexican government arrested Chapo “El Chapo” Guzman’s son, Ovidio Guzman.

And what happened next might as well have come right out of a movie.

Chapo “El Chapo” Guzman, pictured on the left. His son Ovidio Guzman, pictured on the right.

Ovidio Guzman is not only El Chapo’s son, but a high-level trafficker in the Sinaloa Cartel who was indicted by the US Justice Department in February on drug trafficking charges.

When the cartel found out El Chapo’s son had been arrested and taken, they decided to act.

The cartel started fighting and causing mayhem all over the city to recapture Chapo’s son from the government. It looked like something you’d expect to see happening in Syria, not a Mexican city.

Scenes from the attack on Culiacan, on October 17, 2019

On Thursday in the Sinaloan city of Culiacan, the cartel gunmen were everywhere.

They openly drove in trucks with mounted machine guns, blockaded streets flashing their Kalashnikovs and burned trucks unleashing plumes of smoke like it was a scene in Syria.

They took control of the strategic points in the metro area, shut down the airport, roads, and government buildings and exchanged fire with security forces for hours, leaving at least eight people dead.

— Ioan Grillo, Time Magazine

At one point in the chaos and confusion, cartel members even went into a prison, freed around 50 inmates, armed some of them, and recruited them to help them fight the government.

Civilians in the area were forced to stay inside and hide or find some sort of refuge.

Some weren’t even able to get home and had to hunker down in stores and restaurants as the city escalated into a total warzone.

There were videos and transcripts of cartel members radioing the government forces and demanding them to give up El Chapo’s son or their families would be murdered.

And there were reports that members of the military had their family members taken hostage.

DAVID WILCOCK: The Story Beyond the ‘Great Pandemic’ – Video Presentation

Eventually, the government forces decided to release Ovidio in order to avoid more bloodshed.

When it was officially announced my jaw dropped.

I was in utter disbelief.

The next morning, President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of Mexico gave a statement justifying the decision of Mexican security forces to release El Chapo’s son under pressure from the cartel.

“You can’t fight fire with fire. That’s the difference with this strategy compared with what previous governments have done. We don’t want deaths, we don’t want war.”

— President Lopez Obrador

There you have it straight from the mouth of the highest-ranking official in Mexico.

The cartel just waged all-out war against the government. And they won.

More scenes from Culiacan on October 17, 2019, showing widespread destruction

These narcos literally shut down an entire city of 800,000 people and forced the government to surrender to them.

This is history unfolding in Mexico.

It’s completely unprecedented and it feels like here in America, no one’s even talking about it!

That just underneath our border, an entire city was at the mercy of drug traffickers and even the President of the country had to admit the best option was to capitulate to them.

I can only speculate on some reasons that the American mainstream media isn’t giving this story the attention it deserves but I do have a few guesses:
The mainstream media in the United States doesn’t want to spread any stories about Mexico that would validate Trump’s statements on border security or criminality/lawlessness in Mexico.

The story brings too much attention to the War on Drugs, which has been for all intents and purposes, an utter and complete failure.
Possible fear of the organization and discipline that was displayed by the cartel? Maybe they think the cartel’s willingness to arm themselves and mobilize against state authority could give people ideas.

Whatever the reason, I have to wonder.

Why isn’t the 24/7 news cycle that loves to have stories of conflict, war, and struggle, jumping on this story? This is one of the worst security crises Mexico has seen in years.

This situation in #Culiacan is one of the biggest stories from the Mexican drug war to ever develop.

No one can deny the power of the cartel at this point

AFP Graphics

The cartel has power and influence at every level of the Mexican government, military, and police.

It seems they just don’t flaunt it unless necessary.

What this disaster in Culiacan just did was expose to the outside world who truly runs Mexico.

Even from the perception of Mexican citizens this level of brazenness and boldness by the cartels is unprecedented.

This is going to cause a lot of people to start talking and asking questions.

President Lopez Obrador is going to have to address this new reality in Mexico.

While some people may agree with backing down to the cartel in order to avoid violence, many people also consider the move to be cowardly and shameful.

“His idea of peace and love doesn’t work. He is making the cartel stronger, I don’t even know what his strategy is.”

— Raul Benitez (Security Expert)

For the cartel to be able to act with such impunity and demonstrate such an impressive projection of force is truly unsettling.

But I’m not sure what the alternative is.

It’s crazy to think that these criminal organizations have become so vastly influential that trying to take them on directly would potentially mean civil war.

This entire situation in Mexico has become a whole other animal.

MASSIVE US ‘Military Exercise’ in Europe Despite Travel Restrictions; A Cover Operation for Mass Arrests?

Removing the drug traffickers forcibly would mean all-out warfare against the cartels, unimaginable levels of counter-intelligence operations, extensive surveillance & undercover work, and a comprehensive purging of large portions of the Mexican government, from the politicians to the military, to all levels of law enforcement.

In other words, it would take a miracle.

The cartels are so powerful, so dominant, and so embedded in the infrastructure of Mexican society that I’m not sure if forcibly removing them is even an option at this point.
What this means moving forward

There’s no denying that what we’ve just witnessed in Mexico is historic.

It’s an unprecedented development and evolution in this ongoing Mexican drug war.

It’s completely blurring the lines between organized crime and outright insurgency. I think this is something new that we haven’t seen before where you have a criminal organization that has grown this powerful.

Narcos in Mexico have completely shattered the pretense of a government monopoly on violence.

This could have huge repercussions and implications on Mexican domestic and foreign policy. International relations might very well be affected because one can make the argument that the official government of Mexico isn’t truly in power.

This also calls into question so many things about the War on Drugs and Mexico’s relationship with the United States.

With so much money and guns moving south into Mexico and so many drugs moving north into America, this has got to spark a serious conversation.

I‘m not sure what this really means for Mexico and its government moving forward.

The government itself showed a complete failure in maintaining law and order. It showed that they’ll negotiate with terrorists. It showed that the government can be defeated with violence and it might set a precedent for how Mexican drug traffickers respond to future arrests of high-level targets.

This is a dark and challenging time for the people of Mexico and this is a complex and nuanced situation.

Read more at: Medium.com

* * * * *

It’s difficult to look at the article above and imagine such violence occurring in the U.S. However, it’s important to keep in mind that the Mexican state of Sinaloa is only tens of miles away from American soil.

At this point, it’s important to ask ourselves why there is such a huge presence of Mexican drug cartels like MS13 in America right now? Why has the media and the Deep State sided with these criminal terrorists and demonized President Trump’s attempt to keep them out of the country?


According to multiple whistleblowers, the criminal element within the U.S. government actually uses MS13 gang members to do their dirty work. Whenever the Deep State needs to intimidate or eliminate a target, they hire MS13 to get the job done.

Considering the excessive firepower which MS13 and other cartels possess and the fact that these cartels have the resources of the Deep State at their disposal, it doesn’t seem difficult to imagine what the result might be if the arrest process was initiated without dealing with these cartels first. Simply reference the article above to see the potential violence that could erupt on the streets. That violent response was only to protect one key figure in the cartel. Image the entire Deep State being outed and arrested and the possible response from the cartels that might follow.

According to the evidence, this is why the Alliance (with Trump as the front-man) is presently attacking drug cartels. These criminals are directly connected to the Deep State and when these cartels are neutralized here in the States, the Deep State will be completely exposed and vulnerable. (Those of us who have remained attentive will know these events are likely imminent judging from the amount of panic we see in media and from alleged Deep State operatives posing as truthers.)

At present, we may feel discontented being stuck in our homes during this time. However, we might note the fact that our sheltering may have significant reasoning behind it. Granted, remaining isolated for a short time may help to keep us healthy, but beyond this, by remaining off of the streets and avoiding large crowds, we take away the Deep State’s chances of using us as hostages to prevent their own arrests and prosecution.

Have mass arrests operations already begun? That depends upon how we define the operation. Does the neutralization and massive military-style take-down of MS13 and similar cartels qualify as mass arrests? If so, it very much appears that these operations are in full swing. If not, it seems likely that the final process of massive unsealing of indictments and subsequent mass arrest event will soon follow.

Cops Arrest More People for Pot Than All Violent Crimes—Combined—Blame Lack of Resources

Source: The Free Thought Project

Police in Ohio are blaming a lack of resources for the fact that unsolved homicide cases greatly outnumber the cases that are solved, yet they seem to have the resources to arrest thousands of suspected cannabis users.

The failed War on Drugs is alive and well in the state of Ohio where an average of over 20,000 people are arrested on charges of cannabis possession each year. While the Drug Policy Alliance reported that around 30,494 people are arrested for drug-related offenses annually, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws noted that the majority, or around an average of 20,453 arrests, are for cannabis possession and sales.

While Ohio legalized cannabis for medicinal use in 2016, it has taken over one year for regulators to finally start to formalize how and where pot will be grown and available to medical patients,” which means that patients will just now start to see a difference.

However, despite the fact that they seem to have plenty of resources when it comes to arresting and detaining nonviolent offenders, police in Ohio are blaming a lack of resources for the fact that the number of homicide cases they solve continues to decline.

According to a report from The Columbus Dispatch, while over 80 people have been murdered in Columbus, Ohio, in 2017, police have made arrests in just 22 cases, with five cases being solved through “exceptional clearance” which occurs when the killing was self-defense, or the suspect dies. This puts the city at a 34 percent clearance rate for the year.

“It does appear homicide clearances are becoming rarer,” Thomas Hargrove, chairman of the Murder Accountability Project, told the Dispatch. “I’m afraid Columbus is joining a number of cities where most murders go unsolved.”

The homicide clearance rate is calculated by dividing the number of homicides that are cleared—or have suspects that are charged—by the number of homicides that are recorded. While the national average for homicide clearance rate was over 90 percent in the 1960s, it declined to around 64 percent in 2015.

Detectives cited in the report from the Dispatch listed a lack of cooperation from witnesses in communities, a double-digit spike in homicides, which has only taxed limited resources, and the turnaround time at the lab” as reasons from the declining clearance rate.

Hargrove insisted that “more homicides will be solved when there are more resources, mainly detectives,” and said that cities such as Columbus has struggled financially, and the detectives they do have, are spread too thin as it is.

While there has been a recent increase in the murder rate in Ohio, the overall question remains: How did police in the United States go from solving over 90 percent of homicides in the 1960s to around 60 percent today, with cities like Columbus solving as little as 30 percent of homicides? It was not a change in resources—it was the introduction of the Drug War.

Former President Richard Nixon declared the official start of the “War on Drugs” in June 1971:

“America’s public enemy number one in the United States is drug abuse. In order to fight and defeat this enemy, it is necessary to wage a new, all-out offensive. I have asked the Congress to provide the legislative authority and the funds to fuel this kind of an offensive. This will be a worldwide offensive dealing with the problems of sources of supply, as well as Americans who may be stationed abroad, wherever they are in the world. It will be government wide, pulling together the nine different fragmented areas within the government in which this problem is now being handled, and it will be nationwide in terms of a new educational program that we trust will result from the discussions that we have had.”

However, the trend in Ohio has been a trend reflected in many states across the country—the war on drugs has turned into a war on cannabis. The majority of the individuals arrested on drug charges have been arrested for possessing a plant that at least 86 percent of Americans support legalizing in some form.

“Around the country, police make more arrests for drug possession than for any other crime,” an ACLU and Human Rights Watch report found last year. “More than one of every nine arrests by state law enforcement is for drug possession, amounting to more than 1.25 million arrests each year.”

In fact, police make more arrests for marijuana possession alone than for all violent crimes combined.

Aside from caring more about arresting people for a plant than catching a murderer, cops also make arrests disproportionately among race. According to the report, in spite of whites and blacks using drugs at the same rates, black adults are arrested 250% more than their white counterpart for drug posession.

As people literally take to the streets to oppose systemic racism, unfortunately, most of them aren’t pushing for the one solution that would have the biggest effect on stifling it—end the drug war.

The Moscow-Washington hotline between the leaders of the U.S.A. and the Soviet Union goes into operation.

The Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General Douglas MacArthur lands at Atsugi Air Force Base.

The Free Thought Project has provided in-depth coverage of stories that show the true power of cannabis, such as a groundbreaking study published last month, which found that cannabis can stop HIV from becoming AIDS; a study that confirmed that the majority of cannabis users give up prescription opiate medications; and a study that confirmed that cannabis has a “significant” effect on killing cancer cells.

As states like Ohio find that the number of unsolved homicide cases greatly outnumber the cases that are solved, it makes you wonder—what more could they accomplish if they were able to use their resources to track down violent murder suspects, instead of wasting them on nonviolent individuals who are found in possession of a plant?

Congress Agrees to Give Jeff Sessions $0 to Wage War on Medical Marijuana

Source: Anti-Media

May 2, 2017 at 2:18 pm


(
ANTIMEDIA) The war on drugs is such an abysmal failure that even the lawmakers who have funded it for decades are drawing a line in the sand. Multiple bills in Congress have cropped up in recent months aiming to protect medical marijuana and reschedule cannabis, if not legalize it altogether.

The most recent development comes in the form of Congress’ recently unveiled budget, which allots exactly zero dollars to the Department of Justice to wage medical marijuana crackdowns across the country.

We’re revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.

The Rohrabacher-Farr amendment “allows states to carry on with crafting their own medical marijuana policies without fear of federal intervention,” the Huffington Post reported.

The full text of the amendment to the budget bill reads as follows:

“None of the funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be used, with respect to any of the States of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, or with respect to the District of Columbia, Guam, or Puerto Rico, to prevent any of them from implementing their own laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.”

The bill is expected to pass this week and will fund the government through September. Congress is also moving to provide protections for hemp.

Read: The War on Drugs Is An Epic Failure

Dana Rohrabacher, a conservative lawmaker from California, has previously introduced similar legislation to prevent federal encroachment on state marijuana laws. Earlier this year, Anti-Media reported on his introduction of a bill that consisted of only one line:

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of this subchapter related to marihuana shall not apply to any person acting in compliance with State laws relating to the production, possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery of marihuana.

A mounting number of lawmakers, including Reps. Tulsi Gabbard and Tom Garrett, have moved to protect cannabis in states with policies that conflict with federal prohibition, and the country at large. The recent push is, in large part, a result of Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ anti-cannabis rhetoric. Though he reportedly privately assured senators he would not crack down on states where it is legal, he also recently warned that while states can pass their own laws, “…it does remain a violation of federal law to distribute marijuana throughout any place in the United States, whether a state legalizes it or not.

In February, a U.S. Attorney for the Department of Justice claimed an Obama-era rule instructing the agency to respect state laws had been interpreted incorrectly. However, it is unclear whether Sessions influenced this move or that U.S. Attorney acted independently.

Regardless, Sessions has been widely criticized for his views, and his hard-line law and order rhetoriccontinues to reveal just how out of touch he is with the rest of the country when it comes to legalization.

Considering Congress also bears responsibility for decades of the failed war on drugs, it is telling that in recent years, those same lawmakers have appeared to soften their stalwart approach.

Mainstream Media Finally Exposes CIA Drug Trafficking Conspiracy in Explosive History Channel Series

Source: The Free Thought Project

Richard Nixon, in his effort to silence black people and antiwar activists, brought the War on Drugs into full force in 1973. He then signed Reorganization Plan No. 2, which established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Over the course of five decades, this senseless war has waged on. At a cost of over $1 trillion — ruining and ending countless lives in the process — America’s drug war has created a drug problem that is worse now than ever before.

This is no coincidence.

For years, those of us who’ve been paying attention have seen who profits from this inhumane war — the police state and cartels.

This horrendously corrupt and violent drug war has gotten so bad, that it is getting pushed into the mainstream. In an extremely rare move, A&E Networks, a subsidiary of ABC and the Walt Disney Company, will be addressing the government’s role in the drug war in a four-part documentary series on the History Channel, titled, “America’s War on Drugs.”

In this documentary, History channel promises to delve into items that, up until recently, were considered ‘conspiracy theory.’ CIA drug dealing is one of those such items. According to the description on A&E:

“America’s War of Drugs” is an immersive trip through the last five decades, uncovering how the CIA, obsessed with keeping America safe in the fight against communism, allied itself with the mafia and foreign drug traffickers. In exchange for support against foreign enemies, the groups were allowed to grow their drug trade in the United States. 

Promising to be one of the most explosive television series in recent history, the show intends to expose the CIA’s connection to the crack epidemic.

Night one of “America’s War on Drugs” divulges covert Cold War operations that empowered a generation of drug traffickers and reveals the peculiar details of secret CIA LSD experiments which helped fuel the counter-culture movement, leading to President Nixon’s crackdown and declaration of a war on drugs. The documentary series then delves into the rise of the cocaine cowboys, a secret island “cocaine base,” the CIA’s connection to the crack epidemic, the history of the cartels and their murderous tactics, the era of “Just Say No,” the negative effect of NAFTA, and the unlikely career of an almost famous Midwest meth queen.

If the CIA trafficking cocaine into the United States sounds like some tin foil conspiracy theory, think again. Their role in the drug trade was exposed in 1996 in a critical investigative series “Dark Alliance” by Gary Webb for the San Jose Mercury News. The investigation, headed up by Webb revealed ties between the CIA, Nicaraguan contras and the crack cocaine trade ravaging African-American communities.

The investigation provoked massive protests and congressional hearings, as well as overt backlash from the mainstream media to discredit Webb’s reporting. However, decades later, officials would come forward to back Webb’s original investigation up.

Then-senator John Kerry even released a detailed report claiming that not only was there “considerable evidence” linking the Contra effort to trafficking of drugs and weapons — but that the U.S. government knew about it.

Also, as the Free Thought Project previously reported, in a new book, Juan Pablo Escobar Henao, son of notorious Medellín cartel drug kingpin, Pablo Escobar, explains how his father “worked for the CIA.”

In the book, “Pablo Escobar In Fraganti,” Escobar, who lives under the pseudonym, Juan Sebastián Marroquín, explains his “father worked for the CIA selling cocaine to finance the fight against Communism in Central America.”

Going even further down the rabbit hole, the History Channel will address how US involvement in Afghanistan turned the country into a virtual heroin factory and how the drug war empowers cartels.

The final chapter of the series examines how the attacks on September 11thintertwined the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, transforming Afghanistan into a narco-state teeming with corruption. It also explores how American intervention in Mexico helped give rise to El Chapo and the Super Cartels, bringing unprecedented levels of violence and sending even more drugs across America’s borders.

The reason why the drug war actually creates a drug and violence problem is simple. And those who profit most from the drug war — drug war enforcers and cartels — all know it. When the government makes certain substances illegal, it does not remove the demand. Instead, the state creates crime by pushing the sale and control of these substances into the illegal black markets. All the while, demand remains constant.

We can look at the prohibition of alcohol and the subsequent mafia crime wave that ensued as a result as an example. The year 1930, at the peak of prohibition, happened to be the deadliest year for police in American history. 300 police officers were killed, and innumerable poor people slaughtered as the state cracked down on drinkers.

Outlawing substances does not work.

Criminal gangs form to protect sales territory and supply lines. They then monopolize the control of the constant demand. Their entire operation is dependent upon police arresting people for drugs because this grants them a monopoly on their sale.

However, the illegality of drug possession and use is what keeps the low-level users and dealers in and out of the court systems, and most of these people are poor black men. As Dr. Ron Paul has pointed out, black people are more likely to receive a harsher punishment for the same drug crime as a white person.

This revolving door of creating and processing criminals fosters the phenomenon known as Recidivism. Recidivism is a fundamental concept of criminal justice that shows the tendency of those who are processed into the system and the likelihood of future criminal behavior.

The War on Drugs takes good people and turns them into criminals every single minute of every single day. The system is setup in such a way that it fans the flames of violent crime by essentially building a factory that turns out violent criminals.

The system knows this too — as the very existence of the police state is dependent upon the drug war. When drugs are legal, there are far fewer doors to kick in, fines to collect, profit prisons to fill, and money to steal.

When drugs are legalized, gang violence drops too — drastically. Not only does it have a huge effect on the localized gangs in America, but the legalization of drugs is crippling to the violent foreign drug cartels too. 

This is why the Free Thought Project and other open-minded groups all advocate bringing this bloody and criminally ineffective drug war to a sudden and grinding halt.

Hopefully, the History Channel’s new documentary will push others to question drug laws. Hopefully, the documentary wakes people up the idea that legality does not equal morality and that government force, via kidnapping, caging, and killing, is no way to solve an addiction problem. Hopefully.

The War on Drugs Is an Epic Fail

There is a stigma associated with people in regards to the drug culture, bet yet most people don’t even understand the fundamentals about this paradigm. The War on Drugs is not meant to protect people, it’s meant to control the market. Secret Black Ops control the drug trade and it’s all for profit so that they can fund their projects.

As statistics show it is an epic failure. You cannot control the flow of drugs or prevent people from using it. We need to educate not regulate. When we teach others how to be happy and live successfully without drugs there more inclined to not use illicit drugs.

Prohibition of Alcohol didn’t work in the 1920s and the same goes for the war on drugs. We cannot stop people from using drugs. It’s failed and you can now buy drugs online, yes both legal and illegal. The Darknet has made drugs easier to get. This only goes to show the failure of the War on Drugs. It’s time to change the policies and decriminalize drugs. Let’s focus on the health and psychological aspects of addiction. Let’s stop sending people to prison for having a baggy of substances or plants. It’s ridiculous and it needs to end. Families are being destroyed because of our inability to see that our policy on drugs isn’t working.

40years0fdrugwarfailure

Timothy Frappier 

Jay Z narrates and Molly Crabapple illustrates this New York Times video on the total failure of the war on drugs.

This short film, narrated by Jay Z (Shawn Carter) and featuring the artwork of Molly Crabapple, is part history lesson about the war on drugs and part vision statement. As Ms. Crabapple’s haunting images flash by, the film takes us from the Nixon administration and the Rockefeller drug laws — the draconian 1973 statutes enacted in New York that exploded the state’s prison population and ushered in a period of similar sentencing schemes for other states — through the extraordinary growth in our nation’s prison population to the emerging aboveground marijuana market of today. We learn how African-Americans can make up around 13 percent of the United States population — yet 31 percent of those arrested for drug law violations, even though they use and sell drugs at the same rate as whites.

The project came about when, last year, Dream Hampton, the filmmaker and a co-author of Jay Z’s book “Decoded,” approached the Drug Policy Alliance about collaborating with Revolve Impact, the social impact agency she works with. Revolve Impact connects artists and influencers to community organizers, and with marijuana legalization taking hold across the nation — and about to be considered in her own state, California — Ms. Hampton wanted to tackle the contradiction raised by Michelle Alexander, the author of “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness,” in 2014: Why were white men poised to get rich doing the very same thing that African-American boys and men had long been going to prison for? Ms. Hampton proposed creating an animated video that the D.P.A. would produce about the impact of the drug war in African-American communities.