Attorney General Barr Blocks Release of 9/11 Documents Despite Promises to Victims’ Families

Source: The Mind Unleashed 


In a last minute court filing, U.S. officials demanded a federal judge block the release of files detailing Saudi connections to the 9/11 attacks.

On Monday, U.S. Attorney General William Barr, acting director of national intelligence Richard Grenell, and other senior officials called on a federal judge to prevent the disclosure of files related to the role of the government of Saudi Arabia in the September 11 attacks. The officials told the judge in the civil case that the release of the files would endanger national security.

The files are being sought by families of the 9/11 victims who have spent the last two decades attempting to uncover the truth about the attacks. The families filed a lawsuit in federal district court in New York in 2017 as part of their effort to uncover the role of the Saudi government. What is publicly known is that the alleged 9/11 hijackers had a relationship with Saudi government officials. As Pro Publireported, at the 2019 White House September 11 memorial, U.S. President Donald Trump promised the families he would help them uncover the truth about 9/11. He made similar promises while he was campaigning for president.

“He looked us in the eye on 9/11, he shook our hands in the White House and said, ‘I’m going to help you—it’s done’,” Brett Eagleson, a banker whose father was killed in the World Trade Center, told Pro Publica“I think the 9/11 families have lost all hope that the president is going to step up and do the right thing. He’s too beholden to the Saudis.”

The Trump Administration stated that the national security threat was so great that even sharing the reasoning behind the request for secrecy could cause harm. According to Pro Publica, AG Barr told the court that public discussion of the issue “would reveal information that could cause the very harms my assertion of the state secrets privilege is intended to prevent.”

Pro Publica notes that four statements from FBI and Justice Department officials were also under seal and can not be seen by the public. Another five statements from FBI, Justice Department, and CIA officials were only seen by the judge and could not even be shared with the families’ lawyers. Steven Pounian, a lawyer for the families also suggested that “there must be some deep, dark secret that they’re still trying very hard to hide after almost 20 year,” and that it “might be a Saudi government secret.”

But how can these be secrets that still need to be kept from the American people after all this time?” — Steven Pounian, attorney for the 9/11 victims families

The call for secrecy was questioned by three Senators who asked the Justice Department’s inspector general to investigate why the FBI has refused to release information about Saudi connections. The information is being sought as part of a subpoena filed by the 9/11 families in 2018. Senators  Charles Grassley of Iowa, Charles Schumer of New York, and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut questioned the FBI’s decision to keep the files classified.

“The September 11 attacks represent a singular and defining tragedy in the history of our Nation. Nearly 20 years later, the 9/11 families and the American public still have not received the full and transparent accounting of the potential sources of support for those attacks to which they are entitled,” the senators wrote to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

Barr stated that Justice Department guidelines set down by the Obama administration in 2009 prevented the government from asserting a state secrets claim as a method of concealing illegal behavior or embarrassing actions. Barr told the judge that he believed these guidelines had been met. Unfortunately, in the absence of any further information the American public is resigned to trusting Barr, Trump, and anonymous FBI and CIA agents.

Unfortunately, William Barr does not have a record of trustworthy actions. As far back as 1989 Barr discussed his belief that the FBI could legally abduct people in foreign countries without the consent of the foreign government. The opinion was revealed in a leaked legal memo authored by Barr while he was serving as the head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). Barr chose to withhold the full memo and asked the public to trust his conclusion.

In the weeks after 9/11, when the U.S. government began to seize powers to roundup foreign citizens, spy on Americans, and torture anyone accused of terrorism, Newsweek noted that Barr had played a role in paving the way for such actions:

“Now the Bush administration and Congress seemed primed to do just about anything to foil future attacks. Justice Department lawyers have been told to take a fresh look at “everything,” one official said. Perhaps the most startling idea under examination would be a new presidential order authorizing secret military tribunals to try accused terrorists. The idea first occurred to former attorney general William Barr after the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988. Barr, at the time chief of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, got the idea after learning that his office was used during World War II to try—in secret—German saboteurs who were later hanged. The idea was rejected, but it’s being revived on the theory that terrorists are de facto military “combatants” who don’t deserve the full run of constitutional rights.”

More recently, Barr has been involved in perpetuating the myth that encryption is a tool that only terrorists and dangerous criminals use and launching an “orwellian pre-crime program.” In October 2019, MintPress News reported that Barr had recently laid the groundwork for this new program:

“Indeed, since becoming Attorney General under President Trump, Barr has spearheaded numerous efforts to this end, including pushing for a government backdoor into consumer apps or devices that utilize encryption and for a dramatic increase of long-standing yet controversial warrantless electronic surveillance programs.

On July 23rd, Barr gave the keynote address at the 2019 International Conference on Cyber Security (ICCS) and mainly focused on the need for consumer electronic products and applications that use encryption to offer a “backdoor” for the government, specifically law enforcement, in order to obtain access to encrypted communications as a matter of public safety.”

Barr would go on to issue a memorandum to all U.S. attorneys, law enforcement agencies, and high level Justice Department officials calling for the implementation of a new “national disruption and early engagement program” aimed at detecting potential mass shooters before they commit any crime. This memo called for the DOJ and FBI to “refine our ability to identify, assess and engage potential mass shooters before they strike.” Barr called for the pre-crime program to be implemented in early 2020.

The blocking of state secrets related to the September 11 attacks is just the latest in a long line of cover ups and corrupt practices by Attorney General William Barr.


DRUG CARTEL TAKE-DOWN: Why is the U.S. Attacking the Drug Epidemic During the COVID-19 Outbreak?


The fact is clear. Right now, countless Americans and people around the world are feeling confused, angry, and somewhat fearful about the present global situation. The effects of this reported Coronavirus have been cycled throughout mainstream news for several months now, and there is no telling when the apparent threat of this virus will pass.

Yet with the reported success of the various measures now being taken to treat the virus (such as hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin), there does seem to be hope for many of those suffering from this illness.

Still, citizens grow ever more anxious for the COVID-19 threat to pass so that everyone can get back to their lives. At present, we find ourselves asking why there has been such an extreme response to an illness that statistically has a lower death toll than the common flu. Why has the overall response to this outbreak been so excessive compared to other past or present health threats? And why does it seem like the media is manipulating the narrative to stoke fear while refusing to report the high success rate of the COVID-19 treatment?

We can’t come to any definite answers just yet but we do know that at this point, there could be a very substantial reason for the majority of citizens (both in the U.S. and abroad) to remain in their homes at this time.

Recent official disclosures, mainstream news reports, and independent sources suggest that a very large and pending indictment/arrest operation could be looming for the entire continental United States and several other developed countries. Data from the Department of Justice, reports from the White House, and military briefings by the joint chiefs of staff have each communicated the fact that numerous military operations would be underway within a short period of time. (Some have already begun, as of the writing of this article.)

Depending upon the source of these reports, the targets of these military and legal operations tend to vary in focus. However, in general, it appears that numerous terrorist organizations, drug cartels, and possibly hundreds (if not thousands) of Deep State operatives could be slated for arrests and prosecution. Yet why would these pending actions require the population to remain in their homes? If Deep State criminals were the target of these legal and military operations, why should their arrest restrict the movement of the citizenry?

The answer is actually very simple.

Steps Toward Mass Arrests

If a mass-arrest scenario of Deep State interests is, in fact, imminent, it may be the largest joint military operation the world has ever seen. There has never been an arrest operation as large as those reportedly planned by U.S. authorities (along with military forces from around the world). The reason these joint military forces (commonly known as the Alliance) are planning such a large-scale event is that the powers they are opposing have been so violent and troublesome in the past.

In other words, the criminal interests in the cross-hairs of these arrest operations are so influential and resourceful that they may actually resist these military arrest operations with their own military-style countermeasures. In fact, according to reports, this is the exact situation.

REPORT: Trump Admin Deploys Military to Block Drug Cartels from Infiltrating US During Pandemic

Those who have been responsibly researching these topics will have likely come across the well-known source we know as Q-Anon. This is a knowledge base that challenges citizen journalists to do their due diligence and to research beyond the typical media talking points to find the true story. It basically teaches responsible adults to be their own journalist and to discern truth from fiction in nearly any situation.

Some questionable parties have done their best to smear this source of journalistic knowledge, but these smear-artists only continue to fail with empty ad-hominem attacks. Q is not seen as a person or a figure of admiration for anyone that takes it seriously. Instead, this source is merely a means for the average person to gain self-empowerment through journalistic-education and diligent investigation. But back to the subject of interest.

There was a significant Q post from February of 2018 which seems to directly pertain to our present situation. The following excerpt comes from post 725 and focuses on the preliminary actions that need to take place before any mass arrest operations can occur.

“Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.”

— Q

If we consider the past several months, we’ll notice that many of these developments have already transpired. We’ve watched on mainstream news as numerous D.C. officials resigned and stepped down from their positions of influence. We’ve seen the narrative of the fake-news media shift (somewhat) from one that unconditionally smears the president and criticized the foundation of the United States to one that appreciates the country and the efforts the president is making on a daily basis.

We have seen ISIS destroyed even to the point where any would-be terrorist leader is neutralized the moment they attempt to cause violence. Here in the States, we’ve also seen the deportation of MS13 through executive order and tightening of border security. (No thanks to the Deep State media which has tried endlessly to prevent the deportation of this violent drug cartel claiming that it was racist to deport convicted murderers, rapists, and traffickers.) And as things appear, we are about to witness the completion of these preliminary operations through the recent White House initiative to eliminate drug cartels from American borders and coasts.

The original Q post also addresses the U.S.’s achievements in North Korea by President Trump and White House officials. These actions led to significant disarmament of the N.K. military and a number of steps that would ensure the end of Deep State control over the Korean peninsula.

The above Q post goes on to describe the significance of these actions in North Korea as part of a larger effort to disarm all Deep State assets around the world prior to the impending arrests. The Q-team stresses the necessity of completing these steps before the final arrest operations commence. The team also suggests that any attempt to initiate arrests prior to neutralizing these countermeasures could pose a significant threat to the general public.

MASS ARRESTS: US Executes Nationwide Arrest Operations against the ‘Remorseless’ CJNG Cartel

What kind of threat, you might ask? As previously stated, the answer is simple. In fact, we have seen a scenario just like this in the recent past in which a high-profile target was pursued by authorities without the proper preliminary steps being taken to ensure the safety of the public.

Below is a report about the recent attempt by Mexican authorities to arrest one of the leaders of the notorious, Sinaloa drug cartel, Ovidio Guzman (son of the notorious, El Chapo). These events were extremely significant, and yet they received very little attention from American mainstream news.

* * * * *

Source: Medium

Published: October 19, 2019

By: Shameen Yakubu

What Just Happened In Mexico? The Disaster of Culiacan

On Thursday afternoon, October 17, one of the biggest stories in the ongoing saga of the Mexican Drug War occurred.

That day in the city of Culiacan in Sinaloa, police and soldiers from the Mexican government arrested Chapo “El Chapo” Guzman’s son, Ovidio Guzman.

And what happened next might as well have come right out of a movie.

Chapo “El Chapo” Guzman, pictured on the left. His son Ovidio Guzman, pictured on the right.

Ovidio Guzman is not only El Chapo’s son, but a high-level trafficker in the Sinaloa Cartel who was indicted by the US Justice Department in February on drug trafficking charges.

When the cartel found out El Chapo’s son had been arrested and taken, they decided to act.

The cartel started fighting and causing mayhem all over the city to recapture Chapo’s son from the government. It looked like something you’d expect to see happening in Syria, not a Mexican city.

Scenes from the attack on Culiacan, on October 17, 2019

On Thursday in the Sinaloan city of Culiacan, the cartel gunmen were everywhere.

They openly drove in trucks with mounted machine guns, blockaded streets flashing their Kalashnikovs and burned trucks unleashing plumes of smoke like it was a scene in Syria.

They took control of the strategic points in the metro area, shut down the airport, roads, and government buildings and exchanged fire with security forces for hours, leaving at least eight people dead.

— Ioan Grillo, Time Magazine

At one point in the chaos and confusion, cartel members even went into a prison, freed around 50 inmates, armed some of them, and recruited them to help them fight the government.

Civilians in the area were forced to stay inside and hide or find some sort of refuge.

Some weren’t even able to get home and had to hunker down in stores and restaurants as the city escalated into a total warzone.

There were videos and transcripts of cartel members radioing the government forces and demanding them to give up El Chapo’s son or their families would be murdered.

And there were reports that members of the military had their family members taken hostage.

DAVID WILCOCK: The Story Beyond the ‘Great Pandemic’ – Video Presentation

Eventually, the government forces decided to release Ovidio in order to avoid more bloodshed.

When it was officially announced my jaw dropped.

I was in utter disbelief.

The next morning, President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of Mexico gave a statement justifying the decision of Mexican security forces to release El Chapo’s son under pressure from the cartel.

“You can’t fight fire with fire. That’s the difference with this strategy compared with what previous governments have done. We don’t want deaths, we don’t want war.”

— President Lopez Obrador

There you have it straight from the mouth of the highest-ranking official in Mexico.

The cartel just waged all-out war against the government. And they won.

More scenes from Culiacan on October 17, 2019, showing widespread destruction

These narcos literally shut down an entire city of 800,000 people and forced the government to surrender to them.

This is history unfolding in Mexico.

It’s completely unprecedented and it feels like here in America, no one’s even talking about it!

That just underneath our border, an entire city was at the mercy of drug traffickers and even the President of the country had to admit the best option was to capitulate to them.

I can only speculate on some reasons that the American mainstream media isn’t giving this story the attention it deserves but I do have a few guesses:
The mainstream media in the United States doesn’t want to spread any stories about Mexico that would validate Trump’s statements on border security or criminality/lawlessness in Mexico.

The story brings too much attention to the War on Drugs, which has been for all intents and purposes, an utter and complete failure.
Possible fear of the organization and discipline that was displayed by the cartel? Maybe they think the cartel’s willingness to arm themselves and mobilize against state authority could give people ideas.

Whatever the reason, I have to wonder.

Why isn’t the 24/7 news cycle that loves to have stories of conflict, war, and struggle, jumping on this story? This is one of the worst security crises Mexico has seen in years.

This situation in #Culiacan is one of the biggest stories from the Mexican drug war to ever develop.

No one can deny the power of the cartel at this point

AFP Graphics

The cartel has power and influence at every level of the Mexican government, military, and police.

It seems they just don’t flaunt it unless necessary.

What this disaster in Culiacan just did was expose to the outside world who truly runs Mexico.

Even from the perception of Mexican citizens this level of brazenness and boldness by the cartels is unprecedented.

This is going to cause a lot of people to start talking and asking questions.

President Lopez Obrador is going to have to address this new reality in Mexico.

While some people may agree with backing down to the cartel in order to avoid violence, many people also consider the move to be cowardly and shameful.

“His idea of peace and love doesn’t work. He is making the cartel stronger, I don’t even know what his strategy is.”

— Raul Benitez (Security Expert)

For the cartel to be able to act with such impunity and demonstrate such an impressive projection of force is truly unsettling.

But I’m not sure what the alternative is.

It’s crazy to think that these criminal organizations have become so vastly influential that trying to take them on directly would potentially mean civil war.

This entire situation in Mexico has become a whole other animal.

MASSIVE US ‘Military Exercise’ in Europe Despite Travel Restrictions; A Cover Operation for Mass Arrests?

Removing the drug traffickers forcibly would mean all-out warfare against the cartels, unimaginable levels of counter-intelligence operations, extensive surveillance & undercover work, and a comprehensive purging of large portions of the Mexican government, from the politicians to the military, to all levels of law enforcement.

In other words, it would take a miracle.

The cartels are so powerful, so dominant, and so embedded in the infrastructure of Mexican society that I’m not sure if forcibly removing them is even an option at this point.
What this means moving forward

There’s no denying that what we’ve just witnessed in Mexico is historic.

It’s an unprecedented development and evolution in this ongoing Mexican drug war.

It’s completely blurring the lines between organized crime and outright insurgency. I think this is something new that we haven’t seen before where you have a criminal organization that has grown this powerful.

Narcos in Mexico have completely shattered the pretense of a government monopoly on violence.

This could have huge repercussions and implications on Mexican domestic and foreign policy. International relations might very well be affected because one can make the argument that the official government of Mexico isn’t truly in power.

This also calls into question so many things about the War on Drugs and Mexico’s relationship with the United States.

With so much money and guns moving south into Mexico and so many drugs moving north into America, this has got to spark a serious conversation.

I‘m not sure what this really means for Mexico and its government moving forward.

The government itself showed a complete failure in maintaining law and order. It showed that they’ll negotiate with terrorists. It showed that the government can be defeated with violence and it might set a precedent for how Mexican drug traffickers respond to future arrests of high-level targets.

This is a dark and challenging time for the people of Mexico and this is a complex and nuanced situation.

Read more at:

* * * * *

It’s difficult to look at the article above and imagine such violence occurring in the U.S. However, it’s important to keep in mind that the Mexican state of Sinaloa is only tens of miles away from American soil.

At this point, it’s important to ask ourselves why there is such a huge presence of Mexican drug cartels like MS13 in America right now? Why has the media and the Deep State sided with these criminal terrorists and demonized President Trump’s attempt to keep them out of the country?

According to multiple whistleblowers, the criminal element within the U.S. government actually uses MS13 gang members to do their dirty work. Whenever the Deep State needs to intimidate or eliminate a target, they hire MS13 to get the job done.

Considering the excessive firepower which MS13 and other cartels possess and the fact that these cartels have the resources of the Deep State at their disposal, it doesn’t seem difficult to imagine what the result might be if the arrest process was initiated without dealing with these cartels first. Simply reference the article above to see the potential violence that could erupt on the streets. That violent response was only to protect one key figure in the cartel. Image the entire Deep State being outed and arrested and the possible response from the cartels that might follow.

According to the evidence, this is why the Alliance (with Trump as the front-man) is presently attacking drug cartels. These criminals are directly connected to the Deep State and when these cartels are neutralized here in the States, the Deep State will be completely exposed and vulnerable. (Those of us who have remained attentive will know these events are likely imminent judging from the amount of panic we see in media and from alleged Deep State operatives posing as truthers.)

At present, we may feel discontented being stuck in our homes during this time. However, we might note the fact that our sheltering may have significant reasoning behind it. Granted, remaining isolated for a short time may help to keep us healthy, but beyond this, by remaining off of the streets and avoiding large crowds, we take away the Deep State’s chances of using us as hostages to prevent their own arrests and prosecution.

Have mass arrests operations already begun? That depends upon how we define the operation. Does the neutralization and massive military-style take-down of MS13 and similar cartels qualify as mass arrests? If so, it very much appears that these operations are in full swing. If not, it seems likely that the final process of massive unsealing of indictments and subsequent mass arrest event will soon follow.

Julian Assange: Political Prisoner

Source: Ron Paul Institute

Last week’s arrest of Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange by the British government on a US extradition order is an attack on all of us. It is an attack on the US Constitution. It is an attack on the free press. It is an attack on free speech. It is an attack on our right to know what our government is doing with our money in our name. Julian Assange is every bit as much a political prisoner as was Cardinal Mindszenty in Hungary or Nelson Mandela in South Africa.

They, and so many more, were imprisoned because they told the truth about their governments.

Repressive governments do not want their citizens to know that they are up to so they insist on controlling the media. We are taught, at the same time, that we have a free press whose job it is to uncover the corruption in our system so that we can demand our political leaders make some changes or face unemployment. That, we are told, is what makes us different from the totalitarian.

The arrest of Assange is a canary in a coal mine to warn us that something is very wrong with our system.

What’s wrong? The US mainstream media always seems to do the bidding of the US government. That is why they rushed to confirm Washington’s claim that the Assange indictment was not in any way about journalism. It was only about hacking government computers!

As the New York Times said in an editorial, sounding like a mouthpiece of the US government, Julian Assange committed “an indisputable crime.” But was it? As actual journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote last week, what Julian Assange did in 2010, for which he is facing extradition to the US, is no different from what New York Times and other journalists do every day! He attempted to help Chelsea Manning shield his identity as he blew the whistle on US government crimes to a publisher. The information in question included a video showing US military personnel participating in and cheering the murder of Iraqi civilians. Why is it criminal for us to know this?

The difference is that what Assange and Manning did embarrassed the US government, which was lying to us that it was “liberating” Iraq and Afghanistan when it was actually doing the opposite. Mainstream journalists publish “leaks” that help bolster the neocon or other vested narratives of the different factions of the US government. That’s why the US media wants to see Assange in prison, or worse: he upset their apple cart.

The lesson is clear: when you bolster the government’s narrative you are a “brave journalist.” When you expose corruption in government you are a criminal. Do we really want to live in a country where it is illegal to learn that our government is engaged in criminal acts? I thought we had an obligation as an engaged citizenry to hold our government accountable!

As long as Julian Assange is in prison, we are all in prison. When the government has the power to tell us what we we allowed to see, hear, and know, we no longer live in a free society. Julian Assange will be extradited to the US and he will have dozens of charges piled on. They want him to disappear so that the next Assange will think twice before informing us of our government’s crimes. Are we going to let them steal our freedom?

Source: Victurus Libertas 

Source: Victurus Libertas 

Watch this terrifying CNN report, in which they are blatantly saying to us, Conspiracy Theorists = Fake News = Domestic Terrorist.  We have been warning about this for some time now.  I’m sure everyone has noticed that Jim and I never jumped on the “Q” bandwagon.  We got plenty of emails and requests to do so, but we just were not comfortable with it because we were unable to vet Q.  We are watching as what we feared would happen…  is happening.

Jim gives some great commentary and does some really good critical thinking in this report.  Let us know what you think:

Scientists Fear Darpa’s Plan To Infect Insects With GM Viruses To Place On Our Crops

Markab Algedi, Contributor
Waking Times

Again, the mad scientist division of the Pentagon, DARPA, is doing something that causes people anxiety. In 2016, a program called “Insect Allies” was launched by the US Department of Defense. It involves the investment of $45 million over the course of four years into creating viruses, that infect crops, supposedly to help prevent the failure of crops driven by climate change and pathogens.

The main focus of the program appears to be delivering a genetically engineered virus into a plant, that could improve crop growth by altering which genes the plants choose to express.

Let’s just take a step back and think about that: the US military wants to genetically engineer viruses to infect our crops with, so we can eat virus infected, altered crops.

(Image credit: DARPA)

Now, scientists are vocally expressing their concerns about the program’s potential to end up being an offensive biological weapon against the food supplies of other countries.

On Thursday, the editorial was published in Science Magazine, in which scientists from the University of Freiburg in Germany and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary biology, was well as France’s Université de Montpellier, asked the Pentagon to provide more transparency and opportunities for public discussion in regard to the project and what could result from it.

“Easy simplifications could be used to generate a new class of biological weapons,” a press release says“weapons that would be extremely transmissible to susceptible crop species due to insect dispersion as the means of delivery.”

(Image credit: DARPA)

According to VICE“In an email to Motherboard, a DARPA spokesperson rebutted the thesis of the Science Magazine piece and denied any intent to deploy technology developed through Insect Allies in an offensive setting.”

“We created Insect Allies specifically to develop technology that can deliver positive, protective traits to plants to help them survive unanticipated and/or fast-moving agricultural threats,” the DARPA spokesperson wrote“We see it as a critical addition to the national security toolkit, part of a layered strategy to preserve the security of the food supply.”

DARPA makes a lot of daring attempts to develop technology, but this one is clearly more important to the military hierarchy, as the Insect Allies Program is actually a collaboration between DARPA, the EPA, the US Army, and other government agencies.

(Image credit: DARPA)

The end goal for them is to be completed with whatever they are doing by “mid-2021,” as reported by a DARPA slide presentation. The presentation claims the goal of Insect Allies is to “stably transform multiple mature crop plants in a complex, multi-species plant and insect community with enhanced trait(s) of agricultural interest,” by that mid-2021 deadline.

“Per the DARPA slide presentation, climate change is a major threat to US agriculture because it exacerbates extreme heat, flooding, and the formation of more powerful storms. The document also points to biological hazards—such as foreign fungi, viruses, bacteria, and insects—being introduced to US agriculture via global commerce. Volcanic and tectonic activity, like earthquakes, also threaten the US food supply, the presentation stated.”

They provide us with a threat, and then they do whatever they want. The malicious possibilities here are endless, and climate change seems to allow governments to pursue a whole lot of things they never would have been able to justify without it.

The risks are admitted to be serious. There’s the possibility that bugs won’t release the viruses to the plants as they intend. They admit that once the insects are released, they won’t necessarily perform the right actions, according to what they want to happen. Several expensive microscopic genetic tools are said to be at use here.

DARPA outlined in public documents that the first phase of Insect Allies was scheduled to finish near the end of 2018.

In late 2018, the first phase of this program may be complete: which is the “accomplishment” of successfully delivering a genetically modified virus to an insect.

(Image credit: DARPA)

From late this year to early 2020, the next phase of this project is scheduled to involved genetically changing and modifying the viruses they deliver to insects, adjusting the insects and plants as well to make sure the gene delivery is “specialized to thrive in a monoculture.” In other words, specialized to thrive in an environment where it’s nothing but one type of plant.

Continuing from Motherboard“In an email to Motherboard, a DARPA spokesperson said that four research teams have received allotments of the $45 million funding from the agency as a part of Insect Allies, and that all teams have now entered phase two. The teams include researchers from Penn State University, the University of Texas, and Ohio State University.”

It isn’t difficult to tell what opinion this article represents. Do we need this, or want to trust people with placing genetically modified viruses in the crops that become our grocery store produce?

About the Author

This article (Is DARPA Planning to Infect Insects with GM Viruses for Use in Food Crops?) was created by Edge Canopy and is re-posted here with permission. It can be re-shared with attribution but MUST include link to homepage, bio, intact links and this message.  

Dave Janda and Greg Hunter 11-10-18… “Voter Fraud Before, During & After the Midterm Elections”

Published on Nov 10, 2018
Radio host Dr. Dave Janda says the midterm elections are far from over. Janda says, “There was voter fraud before, during and after the midterm elections. My sources say there was a staggering amount of voting machines that were impounded Monday night before the election on Tuesday because they had pre-set votes in them. This involved voting machines in all 50 states….

Trump had teams out there making sure of the integrity of the vote. That is just some of the voter fraud before the elections…. There are a lot of federal officials on the ground….

I think this is going to go by the way of the Jill Stein recount event.” Meaning, massive voter fraud will be uncovered in multiple locations across America.