Financial Tyranny

FINAL VERSION 2/9! A 122-nation alliance is backing a lawsuit that could free the Earth from financial tyranny. This investigation reveals who the perpetrators are and what we can do to solve the problem.

[Note: The most recent updates to these first six sections were posted on Sunday, January 29th. The remaining four sections had to be published separately, due to size constraints on our database.

Please Note: You may quote excerpts from this investigation and republish them in your blog, but please do not re-post the entire investigation, as additional updates and ‘tweaks’ may be necessary. Instead, please link your readers back to the original. Thanks!]

JUST IN THE NICK OF TIME

2012 has begun as a year of rampant paranoia and hopelessness on the Internet and throughout mainstream media.
The economy appears to be in a dire predicament — ready to go over a cliff into an abyss few can even allow themselves to consider.

The Euro has been teetering on the brink of total collapse. A frantic bailout of the entire European Union, proposed by the Federal Reserve, has done very little to relieve the fears of the public.

On December 19th, 2011, Britain announced they will refuse to participate in this bailout — showing how tense and uncertain the situation really is.

Simultaneously, very aggressive and blatant moves are being made to start World War III in the Middle East — with imminent, ever-increasing threats from Israel and the United States to attack Iran.

Since 9/11, Americans and much of the Western world have been led to believe that the biggest enemy they face is terrorism from Islamic extremists. Nonetheless, there is now overwhelming, undeniable evidence that the true enemy… is within.

You are about to read a comprehensive investigation summarizing all the best information I have gathered about the true nature of this crisis since I became directly aware of it, twenty years ago — in 1992.

Very few people are aware that a massive 122-nation coalition has formed to solve the problem — just in the nick of time – and they are backing a legal, public solution to end Financial Tyranny.

A TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT

A trillion-dollar lawsuit was filed as of November 23, 2011 — and the resulting investigation will provide a rock-solid legal framework to reveal the full nature of the problems we face… and arrest those responsible:

Bear in mind that the evidence backing this lawsuit, if made public, will completely expose what has been going on at the highest levels — by the people themselves, speaking in their own words.
This would be the most dramatic public expose’ of the group responsible for this Financial Tyranny since the early 1800s — as you will see.

Our initial announcement and confirmation of this lawsuit has already received over 650,000 hits, 34,000 Facebook Likes and 1000 written comments as we publish this final, completed investigation.

LETHAL CONSEQUENCES
 
This initial announcement also earned me a very serious warning — from two different insiders working at high levels of government — that I needed to publish the entire investigation as quickly as possible, or my life could be in imminent danger.

The conspirators are desperate to stop the bleeding and save themselves from prosecution. Threats, bribery, blackmail, torture and murder are their standard tools of the trade.

As you will see, on December 31st, David Hutzler publicly conveyed vital information to me for this case, acting directly on behalf of Benjamin Fulford — the former Asia-Pacific bureau chief for Forbes Magazine, and a leading representative of this international alliance.

Ben had David direct me to the “Unwanted Publicity Intelligence” website, which contains extremely sensitive documents. I was astonished when I reviewed this website, considering that I was told it is lethally dangerous to publish pictures of the Federal Reserve bonds we will be discussing.

A week later, on January 6th, David and his eight-year-old son Mackie burned to death in their home. Hardly anything recognizable was left. Accelerants were found outside and arson has not been ruled out.
UPDATE 2/7: THEY WERE SHOT TO DEATH, THEN BURNED
 
Just as we were preparing to publish the final version of this investigation, we discovered startling new news.
Autopsies revealed that David Hutzler and his son both died of gunshot wounds — not fire.
MARTINSBURG – The bodies of a father and son discovered after a fire in Glengary last month were found to have gunshot wounds, and an investigation has determined that the blaze was intentionally set, officials confirmed for the first time Monday.

The bodies of 56-year-old David Cole Hutzler and his son, 9-year-old James Hutzler, were discovered Jan. 6 after a fire at 436 Apple Harvest Drive in Berkeley County near the Virginia state line. Both victims were found in the mobile home’s rear bedroom.
 
“I can confirm for you that the fire was intentionally set,” Assistant West Virginia State Fire Marshal Patrick Barker, who investigated the fire, said Monday.

Meanwhile, West Virginia State Trooper J.D. Brand, who is one of the officers leading the investigation into the deaths, confirmed reports that both victims had gunshot wounds. He told a reporter Monday that the incident is now being considered a homicide investigation.

OUTRAGEOUS ASSERTION THAT THIS WAS DONE DELIBERATELY
We all knew and loved “Hutz” on Benjamin Fulford’s forum. He participated frequently and really wanted to make a difference in this world. His comments were funny and insightful. He loved my work and believed in what I’m doing.
He was one of those people who had “the burden of wisdom” — the knowledge of the degree of harm that is being done in this world by Financial Tyranny.

Friends of his have spoken to me personally and said how dearly he loved his son. He would have done anything for Mackie.

Hutz knew from Fulford that we were very close to some major changes in the world — which were extremely positive. That’s why he forwarded me the links to this damning evidence on Ben’s behalf.

All that being said, the police are literally expecting us to believe that he shot Mackie, lit his own home on fire with gasoline well enough to burn it beyond all recognition, and then went back and shot himself — in the same room where Mackie was.

“We believe he took the life of his son and then set the fires and than took his own life,” says Trooper Brand.

From the investigation and talking to people close to the victims the lead investigator, Trooper Brand says the father had a history of making remarks that seemed questionable and unstable.

“Spoke to a number of people that new the victims quite well. Received several accounts of the victim making suicidal comments and also several indicators that over the past couple years he had become mentally unstable,” says Trooper Brand.

Trooper Brand says unless any new information is found, their investigation is complete.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?
 
If you start learning the truth about Financial Tyranny, you will naturally be branded as making “questionable remarks” that seem “mentally unstable” by people who are unaware of the things you are about to read.

Given the fact that this one legal case could single-handedly destroy a conspiracy for global financial tyranny that goes back at least 300 years, do you really think this cover story is true?

If you’re suicidal enough to kill your own son and kill yourself, why would you be so concerned about trying to destroy all the evidence?

Out of fear, skeptics will insist there is no connection between this bizarre double murder and the damning information Hutz passed along to me. I disagree.

Even in light of this blatant threat, I will not be intimidated. This tragic event only inspired me to do an even better job with the investigation.

You deserve to know the truth.

Our future depends on it.

THIS IS NOT YOUR TYPICAL NEWS STORY

Up until now, the only mainstream media outlet that has dared to report on this intriguingly vast and mysterious case is the Courthouse News Service:
The “back story” behind this lawsuit is extremely complex. Since November 23rd, 2011, I have worked an average of 14 or more hours a day to produce this report.

Furthermore, the core information pertaining to the case itself is cloaked in the deepest secrecy. Much of it must be obtained firsthand — from people who have to risk their lives to tell the truth.

Wherever possible, I have drawn off of provable information. When this was unavailable, I relied as much as possible on “leaked” insider testimony that is already well-established on public record to reveal the story. The works of David Guyatt — at http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk — have been uniquely beneficial in this regard.

In addition to the above investigative methods, you will also read the world’s first exclusive, detailed interview with the two main plaintiffs responsible for filing this lawsuit — explaining what they are doing and why it is so urgently needed.
First, however, we need to break down the lies and reveal the full scope of the problem – relying upon provable facts, documented in the public domain, as much as possible.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Since 1913, the currency of the United States has been owned and managed by a private corporation of international bankers known as the “Federal Reserve System.”

This group prints “Federal Reserve Notes” and loans them out to the United States Treasury. American taxpayers then pay interest to the Federal Reserve banking families for the rights to use their money.

The Federal Reserve banking families can therefore print as much money as they want — and give it to whomever they want, secretly, with no oversight or input from the United States government.

In this clip, former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan admits that the Federal Reserve is an independent agency whose decisions cannot be overruled by any element of the legitimate United States government.

“REPORTER: What is the proper relationship… what should be the proper relationship between a chairman of the Fed and a president of the United States?

GREENSPAN: Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency. And that means basically that, uh, there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. 

So long as that is in place, and there is no evidence that the administration, the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don’t frankly matter.

I’ve had very good relationships with presidents.”

26 TRILLION DOLLARS OF FRAUD

Twenty. Six. TRILLION. Dollars.

This is a very difficult number to comprehend — but we do now have a way to wrap our minds around it.

At his website usdebt.kleptocracy.us, Los Angeles-based 3D designer Oto Godfrey has created an incredibly powerful series of images to help us actually visualize this much money — in stacks of 100-dollar bills.

Before you see it, try to stop for a minute and think what it will look like. How many stacks do you think there are? How big do you think they will be? I was quite surprised when I saw it for myself.

The website goes into more detail about each category — so I recommend going there and checking it out, and supporting Oto Godfrey’s amazing work.

WHAT DOES 26 TRILLION DOLLARS ACTUALLY LOOK LIKE?
 
100 Dollars
Ten Thousand Dollars
One Million Dollars
One Hundred Million Dollars
One Billion Dollars
One Trillion Dollars
One Trillion Dollars
Fifteen Trillion Dollars
CONGRESSMAN GRAYSON SPELLS IT OUT
 
Fifteen trillion dollars — or one year’s worth of the US National Debt — is a stack of money that is longer and wider than a football field… and over 2/3rds the height of the Statue of Liberty.

If you add another 11 Trillion to get our total of 26 Trillion, that same stack will now be taller than the Statue of Liberty.
This monstrous mass of paper would look as if a gigantic Borg Cube had completely invaded an entire football stadium — past the ceiling.

Here is a small part of the letter where Congressman Alan Grayson reveals how he found this number, in the newly-audited Federal Reserve balance sheets, to John Hively — “The World’s Most Accurate Economic Forecaster Since 1989”.
CONGRESSMAN GRAYSON: I wouldn’t want anyone to think that I’m dramatizing or amplifying what this GAO report says, so I’m just going to list some of my favorite parts, by page number.

Page 131 – The total lending for the Fed’s “broad-based emergency programs” was $16,115,000,000,000. That’s right, more than $16 trillion. The four largest recipients, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America, received more than a trillion dollars each.

The 5th largest recipient was Barclays PLC. The 8th was the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC. The 9th was Deutsche Bank AG. The 10th was UBS AG. These four institutions each got between a quarter of a trillion and a trillion dollars. None of them is an American bank.

Page 205 – Separate and apart from these “broad-based emergency program” loans were another $10,057,000,000,000 in “currency swaps.” In the “currency swaps,” the Fed handed dollars to foreign central banks, no strings attached, to fund bailouts in other countries….

These currency swaps and the “broad-based emergency program” loans, together, totaled more than $26 trillion. That’s almost $100,000 for every man, woman, and child in America.

That’s an amount equal to more than seven years of federal spending — on the military, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on the debt, and everything else. And around twice America’s total GNP….

If the Fed had extended $26 trillion in credit to the American people instead of Wall Street, would there be 24 million Americans today who can’t find a full-time job?

TWENTY SIX TRILLION DOLLARS? HOW CAN IT BE POSSIBLE?

Does this upset you? Or have you become so numb that you just want to click away and look at hot models – or read about celebrities? “I don’t want to hear this $#!+. My life is bad enough as it is.”

26 Trillion is a gigantic number. Seemingly unimaginable.

This is a documented, proven fact. Isn’t it strange that you’ve hardly heard anything about this in the mainstream media?

That should be your first clue. Knowledge is power. Instead of feeling sick, angry, paranoid, sad or depressed, be aware that once you know the truth, nothing can stop us.

There will be losses. David and Mackie Hutzler may be two of the most recent ones. However, once a “critical mass” of people possess sensitive information, there is simply no possible way to stop it from spreading.

Most people can’t even comprehend such a vast amount of money as 26 Trillion dollars in practical terms – but we’ll get to that.

At first, the most obvious number that jumped out from the report was “only” 16 trillion. You have to add in the ten trillion in “currency swaps” to reach the full 26-trillion-dollar mark.

JUST HOW BIG IS IT?

Let’s stick with the initial figure of 16 trillion for now, as there are very few articles on this subject – and most of them quote that number.

This next article from Unelected.org clearly reveals the scope of the outrage:

The results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve’s nearly 100-year history were posted on Senator Sanders’ webpage earlier this morning:  http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3

What was revealed in the audit was startling: $16,000,000,000,000.00 had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations, and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland.

From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve secretly bailed out many of the world’s banks, corporations, and governments.

The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned — and it was loaned out at 0% interest.

Why the Federal Reserve had never been public about this or even informed the United States Congress about the $16 trillion dollar bailout is obvious.

The American public would have been outraged to find out that the Federal Reserve bailed out foreign banks while Americans were struggling to find jobs.

PUTTING IT IN PERSPECTIVE

So how much could this figure of 16 trillion dollars have done if it were redirected into the United States economy, on behalf of the people — rather than rewarding the banks and financial institutions who started all this mess in the first place?
Let’s continue with the article from Unelected.org and find out:

To place $16 trillion into perspective, remember that the GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion.
The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is “only” $14.5 trillion.

The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is “only” $3.5 trillion.
Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill:There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world.

In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed — and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie — considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received 814 billion dollars.
As it turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion.

IT’S VERY DIFFICULT TO COMPREHEND THE DEPTH OF THE FRAUD

The initial figure of 16 trillion that jumped out of the Federal Reserve audit is more money than all the goods and services produced by every single person in the United States — for any given year.

It is greater than the entire amount of debt ever racked up by the United States in its 235-year history as well.

The 2010 Census estimated there are 114,825,428 households in the US. Sixteen trillion dollars in secret bailouts adds up to 139 thousand and 342 dollars per household.

The full figure of 26 trillion adds up to nearly a quarter million dollars per household – $226,430.68 to be exact.
When you put it in those terms, the full weight of the theft becomes nothing short of staggering.

Imagine if your family had a quarter million dollars saved — and then someone robbed you. What if the thief then told everyone what he did – but no one cared enough to do anything?

That’s what just happened to every single family in the United States of America.

Every single adult in the United States who was unemployed or on public assistance could have been given a job – so they can lead a happy, fulfilling and prosperous life – with plenty of money to spare.

A vast public works program could easily have been created to stimulate the economy – so that the money would become an investment, not a one-time gift.

WHAT COULD WE HAVE DONE?

We could have built high-speed bullet trains to make it easier and faster than flying to travel through congested urban areas — such as the East Coast megalopolis — and other corridors between nearby cities.

We could have restored our archaic, battered fleet of passenger airliners, (which still have ashtrays in the bathrooms,) with all new jets – and bigger, more comfortable seats. (Many flights are delayed or canceled for maintenance. This is a consistent problem when I fly.)

We could have restored our crumbling roads and bridges – increasing comfort, safety and gas mileage.

We could have transformed the inner cities with massive construction and refurbishing projects, and dramatically improved public transportation – making it easier for people to work.

We could have massively upgraded the nation’s fiber-optic capabilities – bringing our Internet access up to speed with most of the rest of the developed world.

We could have completely modernized public schools with enough computers for every kid.

We could have trained or hired teachers to educate our children in the skills and software needed to be competitive in today’s evolving workforce – including touch typing, word processing, spreadsheet, Photoshop, web design, video editing, motion graphics, computer animation and music sequencing.

We could have noticed the enormous popularity of Guitar Hero and RockBand and built sound-proofed music studios in schools, where kids earn lessons and studio time on real musical instruments as an incentive for good grades. If they sign a record deal, a figure such as 25 percent of their advance would be paid back to help finance the school.

We could have boldly invested in clean energy technologies to heal the environment – as China is now doing, to the tune of half a trillion dollars.

And, as Foster Gamble revealed in his groundbreaking independent film Thrive, we could have ended poverty and environmental destruction for as little as 200 billion dollars a year.

Instead of doing any of this, the “one percent” continued to live the lifestyles of the rich and famous — while the poor sank ever deeper into the Next Great Depression, as economist Paul Krugman recently called it.

CONGRESSMAN BERNIE SANDERS STRIPS AWAY THE LIES

In early November, Congressman Bernie Sanders revealed that in addition to handing out 16 trillion dollars, (not counting the ten trillion in “currency swaps” Congressman Grayson pointed out), the Federal Reserve also owns the financial agencies they are supposed to be regulating:

The GAO [audit] also revealed that many of the people who serve as directors of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks come from the exact same financial institutions that the Fed is in charge of regulating.

Further, the GAO found that at least 18 current and former Fed board members were affiliated with banks and companies that received emergency loans from the Federal Reserve during the financial crisis.

In other words, the people “regulating” the banks were the exact same people who were being “regulated.”Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse!…

For example, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase served on the New York Fed’s board of directors at the same time that his bank received more than $390 billion in financial assistance from the Fed….

Getting this type of disclosure was not easy. Wall Street and the Federal Reserve fought it every step of the way.

But, as difficult as it was to lift the veil of secrecy at the Fed, it will be even harder to reform the Fed so that it serves the needs of all Americans, and not just Wall Street. But, that is exactly what we have to do.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA ATTEMPTS TO LIE ABOUT THE REAL SIZE OF THE BAILOUTS
So far, we’ve seen that the Federal Reserve secretly created 26 trillion dollars, without US government approval. This adds up to nearly a quarter million dollars per household in America.

This money was then handed out to financial institutions like Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, the Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank.

While I was conducting this investigation in mid-December, it felt very surreal to see mainstream media journalists say the entire bailout added up to nothing more than 1.2 trillion dollars. Then they tried to say “this is what a central bank is supposed to do.”

Add up the emergency loans the Federal Reserve distributed to banks between 2007 and 2009 — when the American economy lurched closer to collapse than anyone had previously thought possible — and it’s an impressive picture.

On Friday, Bloomberg News made available the fullest version yet of its data on Fed emergency lending, a subject the news organization has written about numerous times in the past year. The Bloomberg release includes records of about 50,000 transactions the Fed made through seven different financial mechanisms.

At their peak, these seven programs represented $1.2 trillion in loans to banks and financial institutions — the high-water mark of a massive, systemic bailout whose details the country’s central banking authority has not always seemed eager to divulge….

Even as critics have accused the Fed of being less than forthcoming, few people claim that the central bank did the wrong thing by stepping in to backstop a financial system that seemed to be on the verge of imploding.
“In the middle of the financial crisis, this is what you need. This is what a central bank is supposed to do,” said James Wilcox, a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.
Wilcox compared the financial crisis to a forest fire — except, he said, “forest fires are more predictable in the path they’re going to take.”

The Huffington Post featured the genuine figures earlier, as we just saw — which made this all the stranger.

The utterly fake figures of 1.2 trillion and 7.7 trillion were both refuted on December 13th, 2011 by economist L. Randall Wray, who said the actual number is a full-on 29 Trillion dollars.

The true total of Federal Reserve emergency lending to Wall Street is not $1.2 trillion, as Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke contends, nor the $7.7 trillion figure reported by Bloomberg News, which Bernanke publicly contests.

The real number, argues economist L. Randall Wray, is a staggering $29 trillion.

Wray writes that Bernanke’s recent defense of the lower figure is “misleading” and that the chairman’s claim that Fed bailouts do not constitute a form of spending is plain wrong.

WAS THE 26-TO-29 TRILLION DOLLARS ENOUGH TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM?

There is simply no justifiable explanation for why this much money was needed. It had nothing to do with securing the assets of ordinary Americans, as we will see.

However, let’s ask this question first: Was this enough money to rescue these institutions and restore them to full health? Or, did it merely keep them on life support a little longer?

THEY ARE IN WAY OVER THEIR HEADS

The answer is shocking. The 26 trillion dollars was nothing more than a sudden gasp of air for companies that are still drowning in debt.

Thanks to deregulation, such as the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act, these institutions were allowed to hold one dollar in the bank, but then spend like they had 5, 10, 30 or even 100 dollars.

To put it in perspective, if you had ten thousand dollars in your checking account, you would suddenly become a millionaire if you could leverage it at the “100X” point in one single “trade”.

These financial institutions have manipulated and abused this system to do casino gambling, on a global scale — to the tune of hundreds of trillions of dollars.

It’s a very complex discussion, but when you see the term “derivatives”, this is what it means.

THE 600-TRILLION-DOLLAR TIME BOMB

Incredibly, just four financial institutions have gambled 600 trillion dollars’ worth of money they don’t even have – so this bailout was still not even close to being enough to protect them.

Even if they had all the money in the world at their disposal, they’d still need ten times more to bail themselves out:

In 2009, five banks held 80% of derivatives in America. Now, just four banks hold a staggering 95.9% of U.S. derivatives, according to a recent report from the Office of the Currency Comptroller.

The four banks in question: JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C), Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE: GS).

Derivatives played a crucial role in bringing down the global economy [in 2008], so you would think that the world’s top policymakers would have reined these things in by now — but they haven’t.

Instead of attacking the problem, regulators have let it spiral out of control, and the result is a $600 trillion time bomb called the derivatives market….

The world’s gross domestic product (GDP) is only about $65 trillion, or roughly 10.83% of the worldwide value of the global derivatives market, according to The Economist.

So there is literally not enough money on the planet to backstop the banks trading these things if they run into trouble.
 
 
WHAT DOES 600 TRILLION DOLLARS LOOK LIKE? 

Oto Godfrey has not created a graphic description of 600 Trillion dollars — yet. However, he did create an image of the total amount of unfunded liabilities in the United States — the total amount that will be needed, in the coming years, to pay all the bills.

That comes out to 114.5 Trillion dollars. Remember — the amount that has already been created by the derivatives swindle is at least five or six times this much.

IT’S EASY TO BACK UP THE SAVINGS OF AVERAGE AMERICANS

I personally do not think it is a bad thing to let these companies fail. I fight back with facts – and think for myself instead.

The real money of ordinary people holding accounts in those banks could have been protected for much less than the cost of even the first public TARP bailout.

Just to prove the point, let’s go to billshrink.com and get some provable statistics:

The average American household income was 50,000 dollars in 2010. The overall tax rate is 19 percent, leaving $40,500 in disposable income.

Overall, Americans spend an incredible 94 percent of their disposable income. The remaining 6 percent is saved in the bank.

This adds up to a mere $2,400 dollars per household. This is not a guess, but a provable statistic.
With 114,825,428 households in the USit would only take one payment of 275 billion, 581 million dollars to guarantee the savings of all American citizens.

The Fed’s secret bailout of 26 trillion dollars was nearly 100 times greater than that.
WHAT ABOUT THE STOCK MARKET?

Obviously the money being held in the stock market is a lot more than 275 billion dollars – but how much is there, exactly?
We know this figure. All you have to do is add up the value of all the companies on the New York Stock Exchange.

This is called “total market capitalization” or the “Total Market Index.” As of this writing, it is just over 13 trillion dollars:

As of today (12/24/11), the Total Market Index is at $ 13,197.2 billion, which is about 88% of the last reported GDP.

This means that even if every single company in the world were to completely stop doing business — abandoning their offices, factories, equipment and services – we could still guarantee every stock on Earth for half the cost of the $26 trillion dollars in interest-free ‘bailout’ loans handed out by the Fed.

Obviously, the offices, factories, equipment, inventory and 95% of the employees could still be used after breaking up these monopolies and arresting the top conspirators. Without the toxic profit losses due to such incredible theft, these companies would probably thrive like never before.

The idea that any company’s entire value to its shareholders would simply disappear in the face of a breakup is completely illogical. Stocks always go down and up, down and up. That’s what they do. People will always need things. There will always be buying and selling.

HOW FAR DOWN DOES THE RABBIT HOLE GO?

Again, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation that prints money for the United States. The US then pays interest for the rights to use these “Federal Reserve Notes.”

The Federal Reserve secretly handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailout money between 2007 and 2010. The top four bailed-out banks are now doing 95.9 percent of all the gambling. Their total risk adds up to 600 trillion dollars – ten times more than all the money in the world.

At this point, it may seem that all we have to do is dismantle the Federal Reserve, let the US Treasury print its own money, back up everyone’s bank accounts for 275 billion dollars, and then allow a handful of “too big to fail” financial institutions to collapse — and be restructured in smaller pieces.

However, we now have scientific proof that this problem goes much deeper than just the Federal Reserve and a few of their closest banking buddies.

Instead, the Federal Reserve appears to be at the epicenter of a vast “interlocking directorate” of companies that may earn up to 80 percent of all the world’s wealth.

This, of course, makes it a lot more complicated to clean things up – but I do still believe it can be done, or else I wouldn’t have conducted this investigation.

USING SUPER-COMPUTERS TO PROVE THE FED RUNS THE WORLD

Ever since Benoit Mandelbrot discovered “fractals” in the 1970s, the fascinating new science of Chaos Theory has become a part of our collective knowledge base.

Mandelbrot discovered a remarkable “geometry of nature” – in which highly complex systems can be reduced down to a few very simple ingredients.

What if we use this same science to “hack” the world’s economy with super-computers – and see how many corporations actually control it?

Three scientists from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, led by James Glattfelder, recently did this – and their results were published in New Scientist, a respected science magazine.

Glattfelder’s team unleashed a vast armada of supercomputers on Orbis 2007 — a very elaborate database of the top 37 million corporations and individual investors worldwide.

The results were absolutely stunning.

A CORE OF 1,318 COMPANIES EARN 80 PERCENT OF THE WORLD’S WEALTH

The Swiss scientists quickly found a total of 43,060 trans-national corporations in the Orbis 2007 database.

From this group, Glattfelder’s team revealed that a ‘core’ of 1,318 companies directly controlled 20 percent of the world’s wealth.

However, these corporations also appeared to own and control the stock in a majority of the world’s largest companies — whose profits added up to an additional 60 percent of global revenues:

Although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1318 [corporations] appeared to collectively own, through their shares, the majority of the world’s large blue chip and manufacturing firms — the “real” economy — representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues….

[This] core of 1318 companies [had] interlocking ownerships. Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20 [other corporations].

A “SUPER-ENTITY” OF 147 CORPORATIONS CONTROL 40 PERCENT OF THE WEALTH

If that isn’t surprising enough for you, then how about this?

Glattfelder’s team then crunched the numbers even harder – and found a very deeply hidden “super-entity” of only 147 corporations – and “much of it” was connected to the 1,318-company ‘core’.

These 147 companies were all interconnected with each other in an “even more tightly knit” pattern than the 1,318 corporations in the ‘core’. To put it simply, they all owned each other’s companies.

[Specifically, each company within the “super-entity” owned shares in all 146 others.]

Together, this super-elite, good-old-boys-club of 147 companies directly earns a whopping 40 percent of all the wealth in the world:
When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a “super-entity” of 147 even more tightly knit companies — all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity — that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network.

Without the advanced technology of supercomputers and chaos theory, no one would have been able to discover this. History has caught up to the Powers that Were.

THE SAME PEOPLE RUN THE FEDERAL RESERVE

Next question: What kind of companies do you think these top 147 corporations are? Remember – they control a staggering 40 percent of the world’s wealth.

As it says on page 6 of the paper, 75 percent of the corporations within the “super-entity” were financial institutions.
The top 20 financial institutions within the “super-entity” should sound pretty familiar to you by now.

They include Barclays Bank, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Merrill Lynch, UBS, Bank of New York, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs.

THE SCIENTISTS DIDN’T WANT TO STICK THEIR NECKS OUT

To be fair, these scientists did say this could all be due to the magic of Chaos theory.
They said this could all be a “logical phase” of the “self-organizing” nature of complex systems – such as the global economy:

“Such structures are common in nature,” says Sugihara…. Or as Braha puts it: “The Occupy Wall Street claim that 1 per cent of people have most of the wealth reflects a logical phase of the self-organising economy.”

So, the super-entity may not result from conspiracy. The real question, says the Zurich team, is whether it can exert concerted political power.

Driffill feels 147 is too many to sustain collusion. Braha suspects they will compete in the market but act together on common interests….

“It’s disconcerting to see how connected things really are,” agrees George Sugihara of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla, California, a complex systems expert who has advised Deutsche Bank.

THE END OF THE PAPER IS WORDED MORE BOLDLY

You never waste words when you write up a scientific paper after years’ worth of hard work. Bearing that in mind, read the last paragraph of the actual paper itself:
This is the first time a ranking of economic actors by global control is presented. Notice that many actors belong to the financial sector… and many of the names are well-known global players….

This means that they do not carry out their business in isolation but, on the contrary, they are tied together in an extremely entangled web of control.

This finding is extremely important since there was no prior economic theory or empirical evidence regarding whether and how top players are connected.

Finally, it should be noted that governments and natural persons are only featured further down in the list.

Then add this line in from the second-to-last paragraph of the first part of the paper, on page 8:

Our results show that, globally, top holders are at least in the position to exert considerable control, either formally (e.g., voting in shareholder and board meetings) or via informal negotiations.

“Informal negotiations” would be one way to describe the Federal Reserve System secretly handing 26 trillion dollars to the “top holders” within the “super-entity” of 147 corporations.

THIS MAY NOT BE A “NATURAL SELF-ORGANIZING EFFECT” AT ALL

Remember what we learned from Congressman Bernie Sanders after they audited the Federal Reserve?

The directors and board members of the 12 Federal Reserve banks are also running the top financial institutions. They just printed 26 trillion dollars of American money and gave it to themselves.
There’s nothing “natural” about this at all.

Our next task is to “follow the money” – and see if we can find out what corporations and industries are owned, either publicly or in secret, by the Federal Reserve “super-entity”. (Glattfelder’s team has not yet published the full list.)
It’s not that hard to do. If 80 percent of all the world’s profits are going to the Federal Reserve “super-entity”, then they would need to control many of the most profitable industries.

As Glattfelder’s team already said, this entity controls “the majority of the world’s large blue chip and manufacturing firms.”

In case you are unfamiliar with the term “blue chip,” it refers to any large company that consistently draws profits. The Dow Jones Industrial Average tracks the top 30 “blue chip” companies.

WHAT ARE THE MOST PROFITABLE INDUSTRIES TO BE IN?

I was able to find a Fortune 500 listing of the most profitable industries, by percentage, for 2008 – but nothing more recent. (If you can find it, let me know.)

This list only applies to American companies, but it is still very relevant. Here’s how it looks:

The Number One industry on the list is Network and Other Communications Equipment, earning a 20.4 percent profit margin. Number Two on the list is Internet Services and Retailing, at 19.4 percent.

Financial Data Services do not appear until sixth place – at 11.7 percent.

Pharmaceuticals squeak into third place at a 19.3 percent margin. However, this is misleading – because the overall healthcare / pharmaceutical industry is broken up into fully seven different categories:

Pharmaceuticals – 19.3%. Medical Products and Equipment – 16.3%. Insurance: Life, Health (stock) – 4.6%. Health Care: Pharmacy and Other Services – 3.0%. Health Care: Medical Facilities – 2.4%. Health Care: Insurance and Managed Care – 2.2%. Wholesalers: Health Care – 1.3%.

There are only 43 industries on the Fortune 500 list that actually generated profits – and seven of them are healthcare.
Healthcare therefore accounts for 16.28% of all the money-making industries on the Fortune 500 list. Nothing else captures that many different categories.

WHAT ABOUT THE OIL COMPANIES?

The second most-profitable American industry, based on the number of categories it has on the list and how high of a percentage they make, is the petroleum and energy business – which controls six out of 43 spots:

Mining, Crude Oil production – 11.5 percent. Oil and Gas Equipment, Services – 10.2 percent. Utilities: Gas and Electric – 8.7 percent. Petroleum Refining –2.1 percent. Pipelines – 1.5 percent. Energy – 0.9 percent.

The oil companies therefore enjoyed 13.95% of all the most profitable categories of American businesses in 2008.

Together, oil and pharmaceuticals occupy 13 out of 43 slots on the Fortune 500 list of the most profitable American industries – or a stunning 30.23 percent of all the money there is to be made.

THE OIL COMPANIES ARE THE MOST PROFITABLE INDIVIDUAL BUSINESSES

Remember – the above figures only tell us how strong of a profit each of these industries is making. If you invested in an industry that was making 20 percent profit per year, you’d be very happy.

This doesn’t actually tell us how much money they are pulling in. If you had a company that cost ten dollars to run, and you made twelve dollars a year, you’d still be making a 20 percent profit.

In order to figure out how much actual money is being made, you have to look at individual businesses.

Here is a link to the Fortune 500 list of the 50 most profitable American businesses in 2010:

The single most profitable American corporation in 2010 was Exxon Mobil — earning 30 billion, 460 million dollars.

Chevron comes in behind AT&T to take third place at 19 billion, 24 million dollars.

ConocoPhillips was #16 at 11 billion, 358 million. Devon Energy and Occidental Petroleum both made 4.5 billion.

Add it all together and you get 69 billion, 842 million dollars in oil profits for 2010 alone – basically 70 billion – and that’s only the oil companies in America’s top 50.

INTERNATIONAL LISTINGS CHANGE THE PICTURE

The Fortune 500 list only applies to American industries.

You have to go international to include the non-American “supermajor” oil companies – namely BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Total S.A. – each of which are also very substantial – in addition to the American-based Chevron, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips.

The full international list with all these companies included is called the Forbes Global 2000. This gives us a better overall sense of what’s going on in the world – but it still only tracks companies that have to publicly report their earnings.

Eight out of the top 20 largest international companies are banks: JP Morgan Chase, HSBC (UK), ICBC (China), Citigroup, BNP Paribas (France), Wells Fargo, Banco Santander (Spain) and China Construction Bank. That’s a total of 40 percent.

Seven of the top 20 public international companies are oil and gas: Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Petro China, Petrobras, Gazprom, Chevron and Total. That’s 35 percent.

So, fifteen out of the top 20 companies on the Forbes 2000 list – seventy-five percent – are either banking or oil. That leaves only five slots left in the top 20.

Let’s also not forget that the Forbes 2000 list only applies to publicly-traded companies.

LET’S LOOK AT THE PHARMACEUTICALS

Let’s go back to the Fortune 500 list of the top American corporations for a minute.

Fully nine out of the top 50 most profitable Fortune 500 companies in 2010 were pharmaceuticals – and they add up to a total of 64 billion, 924.6 million dollars in profits.

These are only the most obvious, verifiable pharmaceutical / healthcare companies on the list, and only those that appear in the top 50 of the Fortune 500 list:

Johnson and Johnson weighs in at ninth place with 13 billion, 334 million. 10th place is Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway, with 12 billion, 967 million. Then, Procter & Gamble comes in right behind them for 12th place at 12 billion, 736 million.

Pfizer shows up at number 21 with 8 billion, 257 million. Eli Lilly is in 29th place with 5 billion, 69.5 million.

UnitedHealth Group comes in at 32nd place with 4 billion, 634 million. Amgen is right behind them at the 33rd slot with 4 billion, 627 million.

United Technologies appears at 37th place with 4 billion, 373 million. Then lastly we see CVS Caremark at 47th place with 3 billion, 427 million.

Again – nine out of all 50 of the top Fortune 500 companies are pharmaceuticals. These companies alone pulled in almost 65 billion dollars in profits for 2010, close behind the 70 billion made in oil money.

Pharmaceuticals do not jump out this much on the Forbes Global 2000 list. The only pharmaceutical company in the top 20 is Berkshire Hathaway at #8, which is technically a conglomerate that has holdings in other industries as well.

DON’T FORGET THE UNITED STATES DEFENSE BUDGET
 
The total combined income for oil and pharmaceuticals in the top 50 slots of the Fortune 500 list is 70 billion plus 65 billion — or 135 billion in total.

This does not include 20.9 billion for Atomic Energy Defense activities, nor 124.5 billion in veterans’ benefits, nor 10.1 billion in foreign military aid, nor 44.1 billion in foreign economic aid, nor 7.5 billion in defense-related activities.
The top 100 defense contractors in 2010 only earned about $129.48 billion, based on a rough, approximate calculation — out of a total Department of Defense expenditure of 692 billion for that year. That still leaves 562.5 billion dollars unaccounted for.

The top five defense contractors for 2010 were Lockheed Martin at 16.7 billion, Northrop Grumman at 11.1 billion, Boeing at 10.4 billion, Raytheon at 6.7 billion and SAIC at 4.7 billion.

In order for the ‘core’ of 1,318 companies to be earning 80 percent of the world’s wealth, it would be absolutely essentialfor them to profit from this enormous defense budget. There’s nothing else like it in the world.

Based on the new findings of the Swiss scientists, many of these defense contractors may be part of a single mega-conglomerate working behind the scenes.

A DIRECT CONNECTION TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE

To review, 80 percent of the world’s profits are being earned by a ‘core’ group of 1,318 corporations.
As we look even deeper, we find this ‘core’ is mostly run by a “super-entity” of 147 companies that are totally interlocked. 75 percent of them are financial institutions.

The top 20 companies in the “super-entity” include Barclays Bank, JP Morgan Chase & Co., Merrill Lynch, UBS, Bank of New York, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs.

Many key Federal Reserve personnel work for these companies – and they secretly handed themselves trillions of dollars in free money between 2007 and 2010.

The 147-part “super-entity” has controlling interest in the 1318-part “core”, which in turn has controlling interest in 80 percent of the world’s wealth.

It would be utterly essential for the Federal Reserve corporations, and their beneficiaries, to be heavily invested into oil and pharmaceuticals — as well as the United States defense system — in order to earn such a tremendous percentage.

Is there any proof that the Federal Reserve elites are, indeed, invested in these and other top businesses? Absolutely.

Let’s now do some historical research on the top two Federal Reserve names we always read about – the Rockefellers and Rothschilds – and see what we find.

ROCKEFELLER’S STANDARD OIL COMPANY

John D. Rockefeller, one of the top architects who founded and bankrolled the Federal Reserve System, also owned and ran Standard Oil Company, beginning in 1870. He soon became America’s first billionaire.

Rockefeller’s spectacular oil profits ultimately allowed him to be in a position to essentially buy the United States government — and its ability to print money – via the Federal Reserve.

Standard Oil had a virtual monopoly on producing, transporting, refining and marketing oil up until 1911, when it was broken up by an alarmed United States Supreme Court in antitrust legislation.

Standard Oil of New Jersey became Esso, later to be renamed Exxon – which became a key part of ExxonMobil, currently the most profitable company in the world — earning 30 billion, 460 million dollars.

Standard Oil of California became Chevron – currently the third most profitable company in the world at 19 billion, 24 million dollars per year.

Continental Oil Company became Conoco, now a part of ConocoPhillips – currently the sixteenth most profitable company in the world at 11 billion, 358 million dollars.

BP Amoco is a conglomerate of several Standard Oil splinter companies. Yahoo Finance currently lists BP Amoco’s gross profit at 16 billion, 28 million dollars.

Therefore, four out of the six “supermajors” in the oil industry are direct Rockefeller spinoffs – BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips.

Our Swiss scientists proved that these companies never really broke apart. The 1,318 in the “core” and 147 “super-entity” corporations are extremely interlocked with one another.

THE ROTHSCHILD FAMILY

Many researchers and insiders have suggested that the single largest Federal Reserve shareholder is the Rothschild family.
I went straight to the source and read their officially-sanctioned The Rothschilds: A Family Portrait, by Frederic Morton, Atheneum Press, New York, 1962, to learn more about them.

I didn’t realize that Frankfurt, Germany was very hostile to Jews in the late 1700s. The Rothschilds lived in the ghetto, were subject to extreme public humiliation, and were nearly broke as of 1764.

16: On his way Mayer could not escape the street urchins whose favorite amusement was to shout, “Jew, do your duty!”—whereupon the Jew had to step aside, take off his hat, and bow.

Having thus entertained the local children, Mayer reached the heavy chains with which soldiers manacled the Judengasse (Jew Street) every night.

The ghetto… [had] an ordinance that barred Frankfurt Jews from farming, from handicrafts, even from dealing in nobler goods such as weapons, silk or fresh fruit….

Another city edict limited the Jews to five hundred families and to no more than twelve marriages a year.

ANGER TURNS TO ACTION

With such extreme public humiliation and oppression, occurring on a daily basis for generations, the Rothschilds may well have lost faith in the goodness and kindness of humanity.

Mayer Amschel Bauer (later “Rothschild”) was born in 1743. After his father’s death, he apprenticed for three years at the Bank of Oppenheimer and became a junior partner.

By then, he had earned enough money to buy his father’s counting house, which was adorned with a red shield, symbolizing the desire for Revolution – thus inspiring him to take the last name “Rothschild.” (The family home he purchased later had a green shield.)

Mayer Amschel soon found ingenious ways to make highly intelligent business deals with top royals, providing banking services to handle all the unpleasant transactions they didn’t want to be involved in.
He won over their good graces through a variety of clever techniques, such as selling them rare and precious coins at absurdly low prices.

I was surprised to see how bluntly the author of The Rothschilds spoke about the level of influence Mayer Amschel’s family came to have on the world – but things were very different in 1962, when the book was written.

13: [In] Frankfurt [Germany]… in a cramped ghetto dwelling… with a yellow star pinned to his caftan, Mayer Amschel Rothschild kept a small store two centuries ago.

[He] married Gutele Schnapper, and raised with her those five incredible sons who conquered the world more thoroughly, more cunningly and much more lastingly than all the Caesars before or all the Hitlers after them.

NO ONE DENIES THE POWER OF THE ROTHSCHILDS

The Rothschild name is no longer commonly heard in mainstream media – but this wasn’t the case when The Rothschilds was written in 1962. Their deep connections to royalty were openly admitted in the book.

5: No modern name breathes a more storied eminence. No nonroyal family has held so much power so consistently, so peculiarly….

It would be insufficient to sum up the family as “still very wealthy.” The Rothschild fortunes in England and in France are as ineffable as ever….

6: For generations the people at Buckingham Palace have recognized the kinship: Queen Victoria often dined and slept in Rothschild houses; the Duke of Windsor fled to a Rothschild (an Austrian one) directly after his abdication.
11: The two big [Rothschild] banks in London and Paris (probably the world’s largest private financial institutions)… have not so much as a name plate outside.

Though they control scores of industrial, commercial, mining and tourist corporations, not one bears the name Rothschild.

Being privately held partnerships, the family houses never need to, and never do, publish a single public balance sheet or any other report of their financial condition.

QUITE AN INORDINATELY SUCCESSFUL FAMILY

As we read further in The Rothschilds, we find out that Mayer Amschel’s five male children distributed themselves throughout Europe – becoming essentially the world’s first multi-national corporation.

Each of his sons rose to very prominent positions of power – in Germany, Austria, England, Italy and France, respectively.

29: Perhaps the early Romans were the most successful nation we have known; perhaps Napoleon the most formidable individual.

It is quite possible that the people still bustling obscurely at the Green Shield [at the end of the 1780s in Frankfurt’s Jewish ghetto] were the family par excellence in modern history.

As long as Mayer lived alone with his wife, he was… a Caesar without centurions. But soon those boys marched out of Gutele’s womb like so many dauntless legions.

First came Amschel, future treasurer of the German Confederation. Then Salomon, who in the end achieved exactly the exalted station in imperial Vienna that remained [Prince] Landgrave William’s perpetual daydream.

Then Nathan, who rose to more power than any other man in England. Then Kalman, who wound the Italian peninsula around his hand. Then Jacob, who was to lord it in France during Republic and Empire.

NATHAN ROTHSCHILD BUYS THE BRITISH EMPIRE

Morton’s book does not apologize about the Rothschilds’ behavior. One of the most stunning examples is in the discussion of “consols” beginning on page 49.

“Consols” was short for “consolidated annuities” – essentially the stock of the British government after it consolidated its assets in 1751. Trading “consols” was literally trading the wealth of the British empire – and its people.

The French Empire, under Napoleon, was trying to take over everything in Europe. A seven-nation alliance commanded by the British was fighting back. It was commonly expected that the final outcome of this conflict would be decided at Waterloo.

The battle all happened on June 18, 1815. Napoleon was outnumbered – 72,000 to 118,000. Napoleon surrendered as of 10PM – after 25,000 of his men had been killed or wounded. 19,300 men were killed or wounded on the Anglo-Prussian side – all in a single day.

That much death and destruction in one field was a horror show. Four days later, Major W. E Frye surveyed the damage and had to leave, because he was so traumatized he nearly threw up.

On arrival there the sight was too horrible to behold. I felt sick in the stomach and was obliged to return.
The multitude of carcasses, the heaps of wounded men with mangled limbs unable to move, and perishing from not having their wounds dressed or from hunger, as the Allies were, of course, obliged to take their surgeons and waggons with them, formed a spectacle I shall never forget.

INSIDER TRADING

Nathan Rothschild was one of the very first to get the news of the British victory – on the dawn of June 20th.

The Rothschilds tells us an agent named Rothworth rushed Nathan the news by boat – beating the official British messenger by several hours.

49: There was no news more precious than the outcome of Waterloo… If Napoleon won, English consols were bound to drop. If he lost, the enemy empire would shatter and consols rise….

Another man in his position would have sunk his worth into consols. But this was Nathan Rothschild… He did not invest. He sold. He dumped consols.

His name was already such that a single substantial move on his part sufficed to bear or bull an issue.

Consols fell. Nathan leaned and leaned, and sold and sold. Consols dropped still more. “Rothschild knows,” the whisper rippled through the ‘Change. “Waterloo is lost.”….

Consols dived, consols plummeted—until, a split second before it was too late, Nathan suddenly bought a giant parcel for a song. Moments afterwards the great news broke, to send consols soaring.

We cannot guess the number of hopes and savings wiped out by this engineered panic… how many liveried servants, how many Watteaus and Rembrandts… [Rothschild] won that single day.

SIX THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED-TIMES INCREASE IN WEALTH

If you don’t understand what happened, he basically tricked everyone into selling everything they had, and then bought it all back on the cheap – right before the stock prices skyrocketed.
 
MASS PANIC IS BIG BUSINESS IF YOU ALREADY KNOW THE OUTCOME
 
The single greatest way to make money and secure control is to stage a mass panic. That was the lesson. If everyone sells and you know exactly the right moment to buy, you can achieve seemingly limitless power.
As the Amazon commenter “SmokeNMirrors” pointed out on August 7, 2009,

Nathan himself believed that with that move he came to control the British money supply, and with it the whole of the British Empire.

That wealth begets wealth is well known; if less than 2 centuries ago one family essentially owned the British Empire, there is a very real chance that that fortune is now many times larger than it was then….

What is beyond doubt is that they have controlled the Federal Reserve since its creation (indeed, it was their creation!) and officially the Bank of England since at least the mid-1800s.

THIS IS NOT A “JEWISH CONSPIRACY”

The Rothschilds’ own sanctioned family biography reveals the extent of power they came to hold throughout Europe.
However, blaming all this on the Jewish people would be a fatal and ridiculous mistake. Any time we begin demonizing whole races of people, we have voted for genocide.

The motivations and philosophies behind these “banking families” are rooted in secret societies that have nothing to do with Judaism, as we will soon see.

I do believe that forgiveness – despite the atrocities that have been and are being committed – will serve us much better than any desire for vigilante justice.

I have had multiple, trusted insider contacts tell me that the younger generations of this and other top banking families want to create radical, positive changes.

They do not share the cynical, negative attitude towards humanity that many of their elders still have.

Furthermore, the “system” is so large, so interconnected and so woven through all aspects of our society that the only valid way to transform it is from within.

Knowledge is the key. The system has thrived in secrecy. The truth will set us free.

WHO ACTUALLY RUNS THE FEDERAL RESERVE?

Though this information is a closely-guarded secret, there have been enough leaks to confirm the identities of the key banking families who founded the Federal Reserve.
By now, many of them should sound familiar to you – since they used the Federal Reserve to bail themselves out:

J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.

They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister’s claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches.

He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.

Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. [3] The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century.

Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others. [4]

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES SACRIFICE PEOPLE FOR PROFITS

Now that we’ve touched on the Rockefeller oil and Rothschild banking aspects of the Federal Reserve, let’s move back to pharmaceuticals for a minute.

Again, nine out of the top 50 most profitable Fortune 500 companies in 2010 were pharmaceuticals – at a total of 64 billion, 924.6 million dollars in profits.

Most people are unaware of the blatant crimes against humanity that have been committed by the biggest pharmaceutical companies:

The US Government Accountability Office says that far from being a font of innovation, the drug market… spends virtually nothing on the diseases that kill the most human beings, like malaria, because the victims are poor, so there’s hardly any profit to be sucked out….

“ME TOO” DRUGS

Many pharmaceutical companies are in the business of creating “me too” drugs. They take a popular drug, change it by at little as one molecule, and re-release it as a new product.

This generates massive amounts of profits – and it is costing us dearly:

A detailed study by Dr Marcia Angell, the former editor of the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, says that only 14 percent of [pharmaceutical companies’] budgets go on developing drugs — usually at the uncreative final part of the drug-trail.

The rest goes on marketing and profits.

And even with that puny 14 percent, drug companies squander a fortune developing “me-too” drugs — medicines that do exactly the same job as a drug that already exists, but has one molecule different, so they can take out a new patent, and receive another avalanche of profits….

The European Union’s competition commissioner, Neelie Kroes, recently concluded that Europeans pay 40 percent more for their medicines than they should because of this “rotten” system — money that could be saving many lives if it was redirected towards real health care.

ARSENIC IN CHICKEN FEED

The pharmaceutical giant Pfizer manufactures chicken feed for factory-raised birds. The droppings of these birds are then fed to factory-raised cattle.

A recent expose’ revealed that Pfizer has been putting arsenic in their chicken feed to allegedly kill parasites and stimulate faster growth.

For many years they argued this did not pass into the meat, but all went out as waste.

Recently this was proven incorrect by the FDA. All factory-raised chicken meat could have had arsenic in it – a deadly poison. This makes it very likely that factory-raised beef may have had arsenic as well.

Though this product Roxarsone has now been pulled from shelves in the United States, Pfizer indicated it wouldn’t necessarily pull it from about a dozen other countries unless regulators force them to.

The toxic poisoning of arsenic creates health problems. Most people try to solve their health problems by taking pharmaceuticals – rather than changing their diets, such as to ethically-raised organic meats.

THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION WAS FINANCED BY THE FED

Foster Gamble’s “Fact Checking” section of the Thrive Movement website reveals that the American Medical Association was financed by the Rockefellers (Federal Reserve).

If you own and control the pharmaceutical industry, it would certainly make sense to secretly run the agency in charge of regulating your products:

Fact: The American Medical Association (AMA) is largely funded by the Rockefellers, who in turn use their funding to influence AMA research and decision-making.

The Rockefeller Foundation website points to various connections between the American Medical Association and the Foundation. Here are a few examples:
The American Medical Association has been accepting money from the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations from as early as 1910.

In The World Without Cancer G. Edward Griffin makes the argument that the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations began to support the AMA in an effort to control the medical schooling establishment and to gain power over this “large and vital sphere of American life.”
WHY WOULD WE KEEP SUCH A CORRUPTED HEALTHCARE SYSTEM?

If the pharmaceutical industry is putting profits over people, and gouging money out of an already strapped economy, then why would we keep it?

Johann Hari reveals the answer – they literally bought the government.

Why would we keep this system, if it is so bad?

The drug companies have spent more than $3 billion on lobbyists and political “contributions” over the past decade in the US alone. They have paid politicians to make the system work in their interests.

If you doubt how deeply this influence goes, listen to a Republican congressman, Walter Burton, who admitted of the last big health care legislation passed in the US in 2003: “The pharmaceutical lobbyists wrote the bill.”
IT ALL STARTS TO BLUR TOGETHER

This is where the lines between government, military, finance, defense contractors and corporations all begin to blur. At the core of all this is a “super-entity” of 147 companies – 75 percent of which are financial institutions.

A hugely popular Rolling Stone article by Matt Tabibi systematically revealed how Goldman Sachs is at the center of an incestuous relationship between Wall Street, the elected government and the Federal Reserve.

This article earned 23,000 Facebook Likes and 268 written comments as a result of its stunning journalism – most of which I won’t include here due to its complexity:

[Goldman Sachs] seemed to count on the unwillingness or inability of federal regulators to stop them — and when called to Washington last year to explain their behavior, Goldman executives brazenly misled Congress, apparently confident that their perjury would carry no serious consequences….

Goldman… [is] a powerful, well-connected firm, with the ear of the president and the Treasury, that appears to have conquered the entire regulatory structure — and stands now on the precipice of officially getting away with one of the biggest financial crimes in history.

The fact that this evidence [covered throughout the article] comes from a U.S. senator’s office, and not the FBI or the SEC, is itself an element in the worsening tale of lawlessness and despotism that sparked a global economic meltdown….

If the Justice Department fails to give the American people a chance to judge this case — if Goldman skates without so much as a trial — it will confirm once and for all the embarrassing truth: that the law in America is subjective, and crime is defined not by what you did, but by who you are.

WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THE SKEPTICS?

Most people go with the “gut” rather than with scientific facts.

Go ahead and try to tell someone that a “super-entity” of 147 corporations appears to be running the world, and those corporations are completely interconnected with the Federal Reserve – which handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailouts, without any regulation or oversight from the American government.

You may find yourself coming face-to-face with very strong denial, ridicule and attack — even in the face of undeniable evidence.

Our Swiss scientist James Glattfelder, who used supercomputers to prove that a small number of companies control the majority of the world’s wealth, spoke directly to the skeptics in this next quote:

“Reality is so complex, we must move away from dogma, whether it’s conspiracy theories or free-market,” saysJames Glattfelder.

“Our analysis is reality-based.”

The next question you would reasonably ask yourself is this: How the hell have these people avoided getting caught for the last 100-plus years?

THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

What if it were possible to discourage critical thinking in the public – so people would never put all the pieces together? One useful way to do this would be to control the educational system.

Again, I understand that I am hitting a brick wall with the “average person” by bringing this up, as they cannot face the possibility that the world they live in has been so deeply manipulated and compromised.
Nonetheless, Foster Gamble’s “Fact Checks” section of the Thrive Movement website makes a compelling case that this is what happened.

THE ROCKEFELLERS “BOUGHT” THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

The Federal Reserve created the National Education Association via the Rockefeller family:

By way of grants, they spent millions of dollars — money which was used to radically bend the traditionalist education system toward a new system that favored standardized testing over critical thinking, toward “scientific management” in schools.

This was part of a calculated plan to make the schooling system benefit corporate America, at the expense of the American school child. Powerful foundations with private interests, such as the Ford Foundation, continue to support, and thereby influence the policy of, the NEA to this day.

Additionally, an unprecedented U.S. Congressional investigation into tax-exempt foundations identified the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations engagement in an agenda for vast population control.

Norman Dodd, Research Director for the Congressional Committee, found this statement in the archives of the Carnegie endowment:

MEDIA CONSOLIDATION

In order for such a vastly interconnected group to avoid detection for this long, it would also be an absolute requirementfor them to buy, own and control the media.

You will soon see compelling, documented proof that the power elite were already bragging about this accomplishment by 1815 – the same year Nathan Rothschild won the British government on a bet.

However, we will review recent history first, so as to better understand how today’s world of seemingly hundreds of independent media sources is actually quite tightly controlled.

In 1983, there were 50 different independent media companies in the United States. By 2004, this number had reduced to five key players: Time Warner, Disney, News Corporation (FOX), Bertelsmann of Germany and Viacom (formerly CBS).
Ben Bagdikian expertly lays out all the proof for this media in his updated 2004 edition of The New Media Monopoly.

These five huge corporations — Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) — own most of the newspapers, magazines, books, radio and TV stations, and movie studios of the United States….

These five are not just large — though they are all among the 325 largest corporations in the world — they are unique among all huge corporations: they are a major factor in changing the politics of the United States, and they condition the social values of children and adults alike.

SIX CORPORATIONS DOMINATE THE UNITED STATES’ MEDIA

A more recent investigation by FAIR.org revealed that the vast majority of media in the United States is dominated by six mega-corporations: General Electric, Walt Disney, News Corp, Time Warner, Viacom and CBS.

[As you delve into the individual categories of cabletelevisionprinttelecom and radio, you find a few more companies chasing behind the Big Six – but not many.]

These companies often control the entire creative process of a film or television show from beginning to ending – making it an ideal environment for creating propaganda:

The U.S. media landscape is dominated by massive corporations that, through a history of mergers and acquisitions, have concentrated their control over what we see, hear and read.

In many cases, these giant companies are vertically integrated, controlling everything from initial production to final distribution.

Three of these mega-conglomerates appear on Fortune 500’s Top 50 Most Profitable list for 2010:

This includes General Electric at 11 billion, 644 million; Walt Disney at 3 billion, 963 million; and Comcast at 3 billion, 635 million.

General Electric is also the world’s third biggest public company – according to the Forbes 2000 list.

AN INTERNATIONAL PLAN TO GENERATE PROPAGANDA?

You may not realize that most of the cable channels on American television are international. Subtitles are used in foreign countries. This is part of why so many people now speak English.

Therefore, the scope of this media consolidation is truly worldwide. Bertelsmann is the only company among Ben Bagdikian’s “Big Five” that is not primarily centered in the United States.

In his seminal work, Bagdikian reveals how these five main companies are shaping and molding society:

These Big Five (with General Electric’s NBC a close sixth) do not manufacture automobiles, or clothing, or nuts and bolts. They manufacture politics and social values.

The media conglomerates have been a major force in creating conservative and far right politics in the country.

They have almost single-handedly as a group, in their radio and television dominance, produced a coarse and vulgar culture that celebrates the most demeaning characteristics in the human psyche — greed, deceit, and cheating as a legitimate way to win (as in the various “reality” shows).

OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD

All this being said, it would be a terrible mistake to arrest and imprison the lower, middle and upper-mid-level staff in the media as if they are all complicit in the problem.

CEOs may not fully understand what’s going on either. They are well-paid to be the scapegoats when all hell breaks loose. The biggest powers are always those who work behind the scenes.

This was well underway by 1948, with a little-known CIA project called Operation Mockingbird. Many documents have since been leaked or declassified on this subject.

Spartacus Educational is overflowing with documentation and links you can read – including references to multiple academic books investigating the subject.

In 1948 Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects. Soon afterwards it was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC).

This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on “propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world.”

Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic American media.Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry….

According to Deborah Davis (Katharine the Great): “By the early 1950s, Wisner ‘owned’ respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles.”…

NEW YORK TIMES EXPOSES OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD

The New York Times actually revealed a small part of this explosive story in 2007.

The C.I.A. monitoring of journalists in 1963, 1971 and 1972, including wiretapping their phones and setting up observation posts across the street from their offices to track their comings and goings and their visitors, was a practice that the White House itself employed during the Nixon administration….

As with other questionable or illegal C.I.A. activities that were endorsed by top government officials, this account shows that spying on reporters was approved at the highest levels of the Kennedy administration….

By ordering the director of central intelligence to conduct a program of domestic surveillance, Kennedy set a precedent that Presidents Johnson, Nixon, and George W. Bush would follow.

The top investigative books on this subject include A Very Private Woman by Nina Burleigh, Mockingbird: The Subversion of the Free Press by the CIA by Alex Constantine, The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America by Hugh Wilford, Who Paid the Piper? by Frances Stonor Saunders and The Very Best Men by Evan Thomas.

This consolidated control did not fizzle out in more recent years. It has only gotten worse.

After a shocking betrayal, Conan O’Brien led the pack in revealing how centralized the media still is today.

CONAN O’BRIEN’S SHOCKING BETRAYAL FROM BIG MEDIA

Very few entities within the mainstream media have ever risen up against their own companies – but Conan O’Brien is a rare exception who should definitely be mentioned at this point.

Conan O’Brien was spectacularly humiliated by Big Media in January 2010 – only seven months after NBC made him the host of the Tonight Show, fulfilling a long-term contract from 2004.

NBC felt Conan’s ratings weren’t high enough. In a classic power-play attempt, NBC tried to force Conan to give the coveted 11:30 slot back to Jay Leno and settle for a show that didn’t begin until 12:05 am.

He soon won a 40 million-dollar settlement for him and his staff due to this obvious breach of contract – and gave a healthy portion of his side of the settlement to his staff as well.

CONAN SANK INTO A DEEP DEPRESSION

After this stunning public humiliation, Conan sank into a deep depression:

I grew up watching Johnny Carson every night and the chance to one day sit in that chair has meant everything to me.

I worked long and hard to get that opportunity, passed up far more lucrative offers, and since 2004 I have spent literally hundreds of hours thinking of ways to extend the franchise long into the future.

“I felt like I’d just been in a car accident,” O’Brien admits to the mag.

His wife Liza Powel says Conan suffered from depression…

“I hated to see him in such a state of tension and unhappiness,” Powel says on a more serious note. “It was very painful for him to let go of this hallowed ground that he’d finally got a chance to stand on.

CONAN GETS HIS REVENGE – TWO YEARS LATER

In late September 2011, Conan announced on his relatively-new TBS show that he was going to officiate over the first same-sex wedding on television – between his costume designer Scott Cronick and his partner David Gorshein.

The mainstream media covered the story – but not with very much originality.

Fully eighteen different news and entertainment shows, from all different networks, were shown reading the same script – almost always word-for-word.

The key phrase revealed on Conan’s show was “Conan O’Brien may be about to push the envelope on late-night television.”

Conan thinly disguised this as comedy – when in fact it was a shocking, unprecedented expose’ of just how thoroughly centralized and controlled the media really is:

THE MEDIA ALSO OWN THE PHARMACEUTICAL AND INSURANCE INDUSTRIES

These facts clearly establish that the mainstream media is heavily consolidated and controlled – despite there being seemingly limitless television channels and media sources.
However, we still haven’t proven that the largest media corporations are interconnected with the Federal Reserve banking families – which dominate the “super-entity” of the top 147 corporations on Earth.
I was surprised to find out that nine of the biggest media corporations on Earth are also controlling partners in the pharmaceutical / healthcare industry.

A recent FAIR study of nine major media corporations and their major outlets, Disney (ABC), General Electric (NBC), CBS, Time Warner (CNN, Time), News Corporation (Fox), New York Times Co., Washington Post Co. (Newsweek), Tribune Co. (Chicago Tribune, L.A. Times) and Gannett (USA Today) found connections to six different insurance companies.

Five out of the nine media corporations studied shared a director with an insurance company; two insurance companies—Chubb and Berkshire Hathaway—were represented by more than one media corporation director.

The study also found crossover between these media corporations and several large pharmaceutical companies, such as Eli Lilly, Merck and Novartis….

Out of the nine media corporations studied, six had directors who also represented the interests of at least one pharmaceutical company. In fact, save for CBS, every media corporation had board connections to either an insurance or pharmaceutical company….

Media Corporation
Insurance & Pharmaceutical Companies
Disney/ABC Procter & Gamble
GE/NBC Chubb, Novartis, Procter & Gamble, Merck
Time Warner AIG, Health Cap, Paratek Pharmaceuticals
Fox/News Corp GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Hybritech
New York Times Co. First Health Group, Eli Lilly
Tribune Co. Abbott Labs, Middelbrook Pharmaceuticals
Gannett/USA Today Chubb
IT’S NOT AN EASY THING TO ACCEPT
 
We have been raised in an educational system that rewards us with prestige and social status if we can precisely regurgitate the “accepted” information.

We can then get into the best schools. They may even pay us to go. We work hard… and money, career, success and fortune will follow… or so we were told.

In order to earn these benefits, we have to be right. We cannot be “wrong”. Our opinion — what we have learned — is the strongest asset we have.

If the information we hold as truth is incorrect, within the standards of the educational system, we receive an F….
…for Failure.

If we are a Failure, then that jeopardizes our money, our health, our livelihoods and the lives of those we care about.

“THEY” ARE COMPLETELY WRONG

We have been taught to use the word “They” when we refer to commonly-held, officially-sanctioned information.
For that same reason, I fastidiously avoid using the word “They” when describing a new scientific discovery.
“They said?” They who?

It’s important to know exactly who said what… and question those sources.
 
WHO, EXACTLY, IS ‘THEY’?

Who are you? And who are they?

Are you really an individual — capable of having your own thoughts?

Or… are you a corporate product?

Are you trained by design to be a sick, depressed, fearful and obedient worker? Sad, pissed off and “Broke as a Joke”?

Given what we have just learned about the media, the American Medical Association and the National Education Association, it’s not much of a leap to figure out that “They” is actually the voice of the Federal Reserve. 

These wealthy international bankers literally bought the rights to become the “collective voice” that you instinctively feel must be correct.
 
SHAME IS THE GREATEST WEAPON

If you read the comments at the end of this investigation, you will see that some people simply do not have the “shame tolerance” sufficient to process this simple, provable, irrefutable truth.

Shame is the single greatest injury we can ever feel. Shame stays with us much, much longer than any physical pain we may feel — such as if we get a cut or a burn.

Shame can persist long after we’ve healed from a broken bone — or even a terrible car accident. Shame can become an emotional state that defines our entire life — our personality, our job, our residence, our relationships… everything.

Shame is what causes us to commit murder — like we may fantasize about if we catch our partner having sex with another person.

Shame is intolerable. Shame sears us with pain. We cry. We shake with rage. We are on the verge of throwing up. We feel as if we are spiraling into catastrophe. We feel there is no hope. All is lost.

We lie in bed, wishing we could sleep, but sweating out each tick of the clock… moment by moment.
Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock. 

Breathe in. Breathe out. Breathe in. Breathe out.

WHAT IS SHAME? 
 
What is shame?

Shame is nothing more than what other people think about you.

If no one ever had any negative opinions of you, then you would never feel any shame.
 
Ever.

You see? It’s that simple.

Intellectually you can understand it. There is nothing to it. The truth is right there in front of you.

It’s only your emotions that get in the way.

Who are the most important people you feel you must avoid being shamed by… at all costs?

THEY are.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO ACCEPT THE POISON
 
If THEY think you are a failure, then you have been taught to feel you are truly lost.

And guess what? THEY have taught you exactly what lines not to cross. THEY reinforce these teachings everywhere you look.

Some thoughts are actually illegal. Particularly if they transform into actions. At that point, you have broken the law — and you will be punished. You are taught what not to do — and you know the consequences.

What if you could love the people in your life who attempt to shame you — without accepting the poison?

What if you could make a decision to simply not be hurt by anyone’s attempt to dump shame on you?

Listen, yes. Make sure you are not violating free will. Avoid manipulating or controlling others. Care about what they have to say. Listen to them. Offer feedback. Be willing to be wrong. Be sensitive to their feelings.
 
All of this can be done without accepting the poison of shame — or delivering it to others. 

You can be a loving person — holding true to all the world’s greatest spiritual teachings — and have the true freedom to think for yourself, and not be bothered by those who would attempt to shame you.

Your survival may well depend on it. 

MANY PEOPLE CAN’T HANDLE IT

I can lay all of the evidence out for you… with meticulous, irrefutable references… but if you’re not ready to hear it, you will use a variety of coping mechanisms in order to rebuild the worldview you have chosen to accept as truth.

You will scramble to avoid shame — and maintain the beliefs you have built up throughout an entire lifetime of experiences, day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.

This, of course, is the worldview that has been fed to you — by the people who then convert your ignorance into profit.

In shame, you pick up the shattered pieces, use a variety of faltering arguments that sound as smart as possible, and proudly strike down any offending thoughts that jeopardize the worldview you have been taught to believe is true.

Deep in your heart, you know you are wrong… but the shame is much too great for you to go there. You have too much at stake. There is too much to lose.

THEY will think you are a failure.

Here’s what I have to say about that.
 
IT’S NOT YOUR FAULT

Your educational upbringing has constructed a reality for you. It speaks to you from every school. Every university. Every newspaper. Every magazine. Every television station. Every radio station. Many (but thankfully not all) books.

It’s not your fault. 

You have absolutely nothing to be ashamed of.

There are so many people who love you. I can promise you that you are not alone. You are loved and cared for… more than you can ever possibly imagine.

I don’t believe this. I know this.

Why? Because I am one of those people.

And there are many, many others just like me.

THAT’S WHY I’M HERE

That’s why I’m putting my life on the line — risking hideous torture and death — to tell you all this.

I could be doing something else. Something much, much safer and easier.

But I’m not. I’m here. Right now.

And with these words, my thoughts of freedom have created immortality.

The idea can never again be silenced. The concept of freedom. The belief in abundance, peace and happiness… for everyone.

You didn’t ask for the world to be this way. You didn’t choose this. It just IS.

And now you and I have to do something about it — and help others who are fighting on our behalf.
In order to do that, my role in this is to continue to educate you. To continue the investigation. We’ve barely even gotten started.

Shame may have prevented you from hearing and understanding the rest of the story — but it’s time for you to know the truth.

STEP BACK AND THINK ABOUT IT

Now step back and think about what we have learned so far in the course of this investigation.

The Federal Reserve handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailout money – to themselves. To their own companies. To their own banks.

That means they’re suffering. This is not something they would have done if they weren’t forced to. 
 
They are experiencing real trouble – and it’s affecting global headlines with rumors of financial collapse.
 
A 122-NATION ALLIANCE

According to former Forbes Asia-Pacific bureau chief Benjamin Fulford, the 2008 collapse was pushed over the tipping point by an international coalition of countries who are actively resisting the Federal Reserve group.

I can now independently confirm this is true because I am in daily contact with some of their top representatives.

It happened because of my willingness to pursue this investigation — once I saw that the lawsuit Benjamin Fulford had been talking about for over a year was real, and had actually been filed in the Southern District Court of New York.

You are not alone. There are already 122 countries fighting for you. More are preparing to join the coalition. They are afraid to speak out because they know they will be killed if they do. At least for right now.

I have written and conducted this investigation on the direct request of this and other important groups — who are fighting for you.

They have handed me provable evidence to give to you. There is much, much more they will give you through other means.
This is, and will be, evidence that no one has ever seen before. Some of it will be very difficult for you to hear — and see.
 
THIS IS WHAT WE’VE GOT

“Well, this is just a metaphysical website. This is not CNN. This is nothing. Who the hell are you? This is the best they could do? LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!” 
 
The reason why it’s not someone else is simple. I sought them out. I’ve done the homework. I was extremely lucky to be offered this chance. And I am brave enough to take it.

As of January 23rd, 2012, I have heard from my top insiders that there are seismic waves of shock rippling through this community at the level of bravery I have demonstrated here by revealing all of this to you.

These peacekeepers will, at the right moment, lay down their lives — if necessary — for your freedom.
Hopefully it won’t come to that.

What we seek is a peaceful, negotiated surrender of the people running these organizations. Not genocide. Not masses rising up to torture and destroy them. A world we can all live in and share… together.
In peace. Free from pain. Free from corruption. Free from Financial Tyranny.
 
LET’S NOT FORGET WHAT WE’VE LEARNED ABOUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE

In order to be free, we must continue the investigation. Let’s not forget what we’ve learned as we head into Section Two.
The Federal Reserve appears to control, directly or indirectly, 1,318 corporations that earn up to 80 percent of the world’s wealth. 147 corporations within that group are totally interconnected with each other, and earn 40 percent of global revenues.

Global media was consolidated from 50 independent corporations to five giants in barely over 20 years – from 1983 to 2004.
One of the top two or three most profitable businesses in America is the healthcare industry. In order for the “super-entity” of 147 corporations to control 80 percent of the wealth, they would almost certainly need to invest in healthcare.
Six out of the top nine media corporations have directors with controlling interests in the pharmaceutical companies.
Eight out of the top nine media corporations have insurance and / or pharmaceutical company executives serving on their Board of Directors.

This is precisely the type of interconnectedness discovered by the Swiss team of scientists – using supercomputers.
Conan O’Brien was burned badly by Big Media – and got his revenge almost two years later, by revealing how virtually every television network was reading off of the same prepared script.
If this all seems very strange to you, it might start making more sense as we head into the next section of our investigation: The History.

CLICK HERE TO READ SECTION TWO: THE HISTORY

COSMIC DISCLOSURE: REVEALING THE ORIGINAL SECRET SPACE VEHICLES WITH MARK MCCANDLISH

Source: Sphere Being Alliance

David Wilcock: All right. Welcome back to “Cosmic Disclosure”. I hope you’re having an amazing day, and maybe after you see this episode, it’s going to become even more amazing. I’m here with Corey Goode, and we have a special guest today, Mark McCandlish, one of the original thirty-nine whistleblowers who came forward at the Disclosure Project event on May 9, 2001, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. to disclose the reality of the extraterrestrial presence on Earth.

|So, Corey, welcome to the show.

Corey Goode: Thank you.

David: All right. We’re going to start now with an intro and overview of Mark, in his own words, from his background. Let’s take a look.

* * * * * *

MARK’S STORY

Mark McCandlish: My electronics aptitude was so high right out of high school that the Air Force was really enthusiastic about getting me to work on something like a weapons control system on aircraft. So that’s where I wound up going.

1 Mark McCandlish

After I got out of the Air Force, I used the GI Bill to go to Brigham Young University, studying design illustration. And then I went to Art Center College of Design as an automotive design major and eventually changed my major to just straight illustration when I began to see that the bottom was about to fall out of the automotive industry, and they weren’t going to be hiring any designers in the late ’70s, early ’80s.

And that’s when I went to work for the defense industry.

I had been approached by the Calabasas Division of Lockheed, and I think this was right at or right before the time that Lockheed joined with Martin Marietta and became Lockheed Martin.

And the gentleman that had asked me to prepare this illustration said that, “We can’t tell you what it looks like. We can’t tell you anything about the aircraft, only that it’s the second generation in an existing family of extremely high speed, high altitude aircraft.

And so we need you to draw a picture of something that looks really fast.

2 SR 71

So I looked around, and the two fastest aircraft that I was aware of at the time was, of course, the SR-71 Blackbird, which is Mach 3 , and then the prototype XB-70 Valkyrie that was built by Rockwell International’s North American Aircraft Division.

3 XB 70

So I combined features from those two aircraft, and I thought, this is a really cool-looking aircraft.

4 Mark S Drawing 1

And I went in, and much to my surprise, they had a couple of engineers from Lockheed Skunk Works there.

And it was an order gentleman with glasses, a receding hairline. And they were actually wearing little white lab coats with the pocket protector and the slide rule and this kind of thing.

And so I opened up my sketchpad, and I turned around, and I slid it across this big, beautiful, mahogany table in this conference room.

And right away, I could see that something was wrong. The gentleman both took on an appearance of being kind of startled, like they were seeing something they weren’t expecting.

And then one of the two gentlemen – the man with the glasses, the receding hairline – you could literally see his face turn red. You could see beads of sweat starting to form on his forehead and his lip. And his hands started to tremble.

And he slams his hand down on the notepad, and he says, “What are these canards, and what are these winglets out on the wings? Those would be torn off at Mach 17 . . .” And he stopped himself right there as he said “Mach 17”.

And I thought, “That’s 12,000 miles an hour [19,300 kph]!”

And they were both upset. And they were upset in a way that, at first, I thought it was because I didn’t do a good job, because the illustration didn’t look credible.

And then I thought, “No, this is something else.” They’re reacting because I’ve hit something. I’ve hit the nail right on the head with this illustration, and they may perceive that what I’ve done here is because of some kind of a leak – some kind of an information leak.

And so the first thing I did was I tried to assure them by saying, “Well, look, I’ll be happy to illustrate whatever you want, but the fact is, I just don’t know what your aircraft looks like because nobody’s told me. They said they can’t tell me. The design is classified. So what I’ve done here is I’ve combined most of the most interesting features from these two aircraft – the two fastest aircraft that I know of – the SR-71 and the XB-70.”

5 Mark S Drawing 2

And so then they kind of calmed down a little bit and relaxed. But at that point, the cat was already out of the bag. They’d said “Mach 17”.

It really pointed out to me that there were some programs that were going on. And, of course, you always assume that there’s something classified going on all the time behind the scenes.

But as far as aircraft design was concerned, it really helped to illustrate that there were things going on – advanced projects – that were really pushing the envelope in terms of material use, high speed, high altitude and propulsion systems that had never been seen before – these supersonic combustion ramjet or scramjet engines.

And so it was an eye-opener. That’s for sure. It let me know that there were other things out there that the general public didn’t know about.

* * * * * *

David: Okay. So what you see there is very interesting. Here’s a guy who’s describing having a direct one-on-one meeting with insiders from Lockheed Martin Skunk Works.

And they told him that canards and winglets on the plane would fall off at Mach 17. So clearly, he had access to the real deal.

Corey, what were your thoughts as you watched this clip?

Corey: It was pretty interesting. I had seen information about these early planes that they were developing, and they were very, extremely aerodynamic.

But when he was talking, for some reason – it popped in my mind – I remember a type of engineered crystal that they were using that they would put on the outside of these craft that . . . You know, like piezoelectric crystals. If you hit them, they’ll give off an electrical charge?

David: Yeah, sure.

Corey: These convert friction heat into electric charges.

David: Oh, that makes sense.

Corey: And then the skin of the plane would have this crystalline material painted over it. And then the heat would be turned into electricity. The electricity would transfer through the skin of the plane into something that would quickly store the electricity. So it would be kind of like a heat sink.

It would be pulling electricity very quickly, and heat couldn’t build up.

David: Well, let me just mention that there are known things called photo cells, which we already have in electronics, where they can sense a light source and actually convert that light to electricity.

So this idea of basically what you’re describing as a thermal couple on the outside of the plane, that’s totally plausible within electronics that that could work. I just never thought of it before. It’s fascinating.

Corey: Right. I’d forgotten about it, too. It just popped in my head when I was watching that clip.

David: So Mach 17, . . . of course, some of the people watching this may not be aware that conventional aeronautics . . . even Mach 4, Mach 5, is considered extraordinary.

What are the speeds that you encountered with some of the craft that are in the classified world that he got a little taste of here?

Corey: Well, yeah, there was a lot of talk of craft that were being developed between Mach 9 and Mach 20 . . .

David: Right.

Corey: . . . that were being developed that were mostly for flying in the atmosphere – test craft to get to a point where they could develop craft that could fly in and out of the atmosphere.

David: So is it normal for somebody like Mark McCandlish to have this background of industrial design – he said that he majored, at first, in drawing automobiles and getting really nice technical illustrations of them, and then in his case, going into the defense industry – that a guy with those skills could end up potentially in some kind of classified program?

Corey: Absolutely. They need people of all skill sets. You’re going to run across a lot of draftsmen, artists, that worked for the government that have a lot of knowledge like he does.

David: Now, another thing that is interesting to me was he mentions Brigham Young University. And Pete, tongue-in-cheek, called that whole area – Utah, Idaho, etc. – “Mormania”. And it was originally a joke, but apparently, on the inside, they now actually use that term – that what I’ve heard from him – and I want to get your thoughts on this – is that many people who worked for the CIA and other intelligence agencies are recruited from Mormon states in America, that there is a Mormon component to the black ops world.

So I’m curious if you ever heard anything about that?

Corey: Yes. I read on the smart glass pad about how different Mormon groups were creating vaults underground and were reporting back to the intelligence agencies that they were encountering beings when they were trying to build their facilities underground.

David: Beings that were not human?

Corey: Correct.

David: When we see a guy like McCandlish coming out and talking about this, what do you think he had to gain from this? In other words, I don’t see any evidence. I don’t think he’s ever written a book.

He kind of went off the radar after Disclosure Project in 2001. Now here it is, 16 years later, he pops up again.

So do you think that there’s any self-interest or manipulation going on here? What’s his objective?

Corey: One of the things you see quite often with whistleblowers is that in the process of being a whistleblower, they end up losing their careers. And he pretty much lost his career within all of the defense industry and basically was in hiding for a while from what I hear.

David: All right. We’re going to now continue with some more footage for you to check out. This is the second part of our groundbreaking interview with Mark McCandlish. Let’s check it out.

* * * * * *

COVERT CRAFT

Mark McCandlish: Well, this is a story that came to me through another aviation artist that . . . One of my contemporaries met this fellow and a friend of his at an air show at the old Chino Air Base where they brought a lot of the aircraft after the Second World War to be demolished and scrapped for their aluminum and so forth.

And he was saying that this fellow had a friend who was a former astronaut – it was one of the Buzz astronauts, Buzz Aldrin or Buzz Carpenter – one of these gentlemen.

And this individual was flying a Learjet, ferrying it from one location to another, and he was passing over North Central Nevada at the time – broken clouds and this kind of thing.

And he comes out of some clouds and into an open air space, and below him and to the left is this black aircraft that looks sort of like a flattened-out football shape.

6 Artist S Drawing Of Black Aircraft

And on the back end of it, it has not only a vertical stabilizer or a tail on the top, but there was another one down below.

A lot of people don’t know that the early A-12 version of the SR-71 Blackbird also had the same feature. It had a folding vertical stabilizer on the ventral surface on the underside of the aircraft.

But this aircraft had an unusual inlet design. It wasn’t the typical thing where you have a big hole hanging down underneath the wing where the air for the engine comes in.

This thing had, what looked like, a pair of these triangular-shaped NACA ducts near the leading edge of this.

There were no wings, no tail feathers – nothing. It was just sort of a lifting body design, like a flattened-out football shape.

7 Mark S Sketch 2004

Control surfaces along the leading edges and on the trailing edges, but the inlets were a pair of NACA ducts.

8 NACA Ducts

And then at the back end were a pair of trapezoid-shaped exhaust ports. But then at the midsection, the widest part of this platform, was a ridge. And along the trailing edge of the ridge were what appeared to be a number of fuel injectors pointing outward where it was obvious at some point in the flight regime of the aircraft, there would be something expelled from those ports.

And it was actually operating kind of like the whole back end of the aircraft was a linear aerospike engine, which has that kind of a configuration.

The pilot is there, and he looks at this plane and realizes that if he hadn’t seen it directly that he might have collided with it in the clouds.

And so he gets ahold of the ground control operator for that region, and he says, “Why didn’t you inform me that there was another aircraft in my vicinity?”

And he said, “Well . . . “ The response was, “. . . because there isn’t any. We don’t have anything on radar at all.”

And he says, “Well, the hell there isn’t.” He says, “I’m looking at a plane right now. It’s black. It has the two tails.” He described what he was seeing, “I’m in his 5 o’clock position.”

And there’s a long silence on the radio.

And then all of a sudden, he can see in the window, the cockpit – it’s kind of like the X-15 cockpit where it’s mostly aircraft with just a little tiny window and a splitter in the front. And he sees the face of the pilot look around at him like this, and like, “Oh, crap!”, and banks away and goes into one of the clouds and disappears.

So a little while later, there’s another voice that comes onto the radio – a deeper voice, a more serious voice, and he says, “Okay, pilot zone, so you need to change your heading and come in to Nellis Air Force Base, and we need you to land there and be debriefed. And I want you to roll out and stay at the end of the runway. You will be met at the end of the runway.”

And so then they take him in, and they put him through interrogation and make it real clear that what he saw was something that doesn’t officially exist, and he’s not to talk about it.

But eventually, apparently, he did tell someone, including this colleague of mine who shared the story with me.

* * * * * *

David: The first thing I thought of when he said a ‘squashed football’ was your description of the Dark Fleet craft which you said have a dark teardrop-type of shape.

9 Dark Fleet Pumpkin Craft

Corey: Right.

David: But based on the illustration that McCandlish made here, is that what we’re looking at, or is this something else?

Corey: I knew immediately, the way he was describing the craft with the two fins, the two stabilizers, that it was a test craft from the military. I’ve read before about these vertical stabilizers, that are on the top and bottom, that, at a certain stage in flight, the bottom one drops to give them further stabilization.

David: Well, he had the location right, because he said this witness saw this over Nevada.

Corey: Right.

David: So there you go. That’s your Area 51.

Corey: Right. That’s a good place to see test craft.

I’ve received quite a few emails from pilots, that don’t want to go public because of their jobs, that have described seeing very similar things.

David: Really?

Corey: Yeah.

David: One of the insiders that I have had contact with – I met through Pete Peterson – he claims to have been able to build eight different types of anti-gravity device. And he worked on aerospace design.

He has described that a lot of times these planes were built, and then they were mothballed. And he believed that the purpose was money laundering – that the plane was said to cost much more than it really did. It justifies these budgets.

The actual money spent on it might be much less, and then the less of the money goes to some other thing. Have you heard of that, and if so, where’s the money going?

Corey: Yes. A lot of these contracting companies are . . . I mean, everyone’s heard about $200 hammers, $300 toilet seats . . .

David: Right.

Corey: . . . that kind of thing. That occurs all the time to bring in extra money for black budgets. So that’s fairly common.

David: What might some of those black budgets be? I mean, wouldn’t this plane be the goal . . .

Corey: Right.

David: . . . or would it be something else?

Corey: Something like this probably came from a budget from a craft or something they were building that was known. And then they overcharged for that craft . . .

David: Right.

Corey: . . . and funneled that money into a craft like this. And a lot of times they’ll build these craft. They’ll put millions of dollars into building a craft like this just to prove a certain concept for future craft that they’ll fly around a few times, and then they mothball them or take them apart.

David: Right. So given the design and the shape of this particular craft, what type of usefulness to you think it might have?

Corey: I think they were trying to increase stabilized flight past Mach 3 to 5, most likely.

David: It doesn’t really look like it would capture air like a wing. Do you think there’s some sort of anti-gravity component to how this works?

Corey: No. This is a conventional jet. It’s just really advanced technology. It’s kind of like what he was talking about – sort of like a ramjet. It brings in the air at the wings and expels the gases and air out the back to propel it.

David: All right. Next, we have another very interesting and strange story from Mark McCandlish, which I’m sure you’re going to like. Let’s check it out.

* * * * * *

SURPRISING TECHNOLOGY

Mark McCandlish: There was a gentleman, and I don’t remember where he was located, but he had a custom of jogging early in the morning with his dog. And one of the challenges that he made for himself was he would jog on this path that would go up to the top of this hill near the town where they had the city water supply. It was a big tower.

And it was a heavily wooded area with a clearing around the tower itself.

And as they’re jogging up the hill, he comes out into the clearing where the tower is, and here is this aircraft. And it looks like a conventional jet aircraft standing on its tail, and it’s orbiting this water tower silently.

10 Jet Circling Water Tower

No jet engine noise, no dust being kicked up or anything, and the pilot is just sort of playing.

And he’s just standing there with his mouth hanging open, and his dog is barking and really going crazy.

And while the pilot’s doing this, he kind of looks over his shoulder, and he sees the jogger there. “Oh, no!”

11 Jet Leaving Scene

So he lights up the after burner, and off he goes using conventional power.

So it just pointed out that there must be some other things that they’re incorporating and folding into some of the . . . maybe even the standard issue aircraft that are giving them abilities that are not completely obvious when looking at them from the outside.

* * * * * *

David: This is one of those stories that seems to stretch the credulity a little bit. What is your feeling about the idea that conventional aircraft might have some sort of anti-gravity that would allow them to do those types of tricks?

Corey: Well, it’s definitely not something that would be standard issue on one of the fleets right now out to sea.

David: Right.

Corey: But they have retrofitted conventional-looking craft with anti-gravity for specific reasons to be used, I guess, for special missions. It’s not something that a lot of the different lieutenant commanders out there in the Navy that fly jets . . . they’re not going to have this or know about this type of technology being incorporated into conventional craft. But it is something I’ve heard of. I haven’t seen it with my own eyes.

David: I’ve also had Peterson tell me that military aircraft are all now – or at least many of them – are equipped with a technology that he called ‘masking’. Are you familiar with that and what that’s all about?

Corey: Yeah, masking is a common term. It just means ‘camouflage’. It’s an electronic camouflage.

David: So would a masked craft still be visible once the masking is turned on?

Corey: No. No.

David: Right.

Corey: That’s the whole point of it. It pretty much . . . You’re seeing what’s behind the craft.

David: So what would the usefulness be of a pilot able to back the tail of a plane down and then turn circles around a tower like that?

Corey: That’s not really the point. The point is to be able to loiter and hover to engage targets like a helicopter would and then having the supersonic flight capabilities as well.

It’s one of the reasons also they developed the Harrier.

David: Sure.

Corey: Then you have the vertical takeoff and landing capabilities as well.

David: Now do you think it’s possible, given that he seemed to have been turning circles around a tower, that the anti-gravity, in some way, was able to partially attach to the mass of the tower and use it as a center of balance or a pivot point for him?

Corey: No. Most likely what occurred is . . . They have a lot of this smart flight technology in drones now. And it’s usually a camera that has intelligent computers connected to it.

The camera acts like an eye, focuses on like a tower, and then it will loiter and hover around a certain object.

David: Ah. So this could have all been done automatically. He was just having fun.

Corey: Right.

David: He doesn’t have to do any fancy flying at all.

Corey: Yes. It looked like he took a little time out of a normal test flight to play around a little bit on his own.

David: All right. Now we’re going to see a very interesting section of this interview where McCandlish is describing a UFO sighting that actually led to photographic evidence. Let’s take a look.

* * * * * *

THE CEDARVILLE UFO

Mark McCandlish: It was a fellow that I knew – his name was Arthur Reed – who took this photograph in 1982. He was just exploring northern California by car.

He was driving somewhere about 10 miles north of Cedarville, and he saw a large group of people that had pulled off the road, and they were all sort of looking off to the west.

And so he, just out of curiosity, stopped to see what it was. And off in the distance was this immense, black thing – big, large, V-shaped vehicle.

12 People Watching UFO

13 Closeup Of UFO

And the shape of it was what kind of gave it away as the possible product of Lockheed Skunk Works, because it had the same sort of faceted flat surfaces like a Stealth Fire.

The craft looked an awful lot like a large black V, and in the middle of each of those two wings, or legs, or whatever you want to call them, which were really thick and not aerodynamic in any way, shape or form, but there was a large white sphere.

14 Drawin Gof V Shaped Vehicle

And then there was one up in the very front where they kind of came together. And there were seams on the surface of the thing that looked like the different parts of the vehicle could be articulated and folded up into almost a triangular shape.

15 Drawing 2 Of V Shaped Vehicle

There were a series of red lights that went from the nose back towards part of the fuselage where the wings joined together.

16 Drawing 3 Red Lights

And the thing was in a nose down, bank to the left, and it was hovering in this position about maybe 250 feet off the ground.

17 Animation Screen Shot

And it was maybe a quarter of a mile to a half a mile off the roadway.

Very large. He said that he thought that this thing was somewhere between 300 and 600 feet on a side. It was that big.

He said that it was making this low, pulsating, humming sound, almost like something you’d see in a science fiction movie, sort of this [whirring sound] kind of sound. But he said it was so powerful, so loud, that you could feel it in your chest – that your chest would kind of vibrate and resonate with the sound.

And the people that were there that had pulled off the road represented kind of like a cross-section of what you’d find in America – the deeply religious people that are crying and on their knees, praying to God to deliver them from this chariot of the devil.

There were other people who were running towards it and waving and saying, “Take me for a ride”. And there were other people there hooting and hollering like they were watching a fireworks show on the 4th of July.

In the photograph, in the foreground, you can see people standing in the bed of their truck, and you’re seeing them all from the back, so you can’t tell exactly what they’re doing. But a lot of them, their arms are like this [up in front of his eyes], like they’re watching it through field glasses.

There are other people just sort of standing around, just taking it all in, watching everything.

But he said that this thing sat there for the better part of a half an hour, and that’s why there were so many people that had pulled off and were watching.

And apparently, there was some kind of a flight control issue with this thing, and it had initiated a bank, and then they couldn’t pull out of this dive, so they just stopped. And it was hovered in this banked, nose-down position.

And so apparently, whoever was working on this thing was not able to repair that particular problem. And so the way they resolved it was this thing continued in its bank. I have to turn my hand the other way to do it right, but imagine that this [his hand is now face up and he’s pointing to his palm] is the upper surface like this.

So the thing flips end over end like this [the top rising up and back], but at the same time, it continues the roll. So it goes like this [it first rolled to the right and then the nose twisted up and back], and it’s pointed up and away from the crowd.

18 Animation Plane Taking Off

It starts to climb out slowly, getting louder and louder, and then it gets to about 5,000 feet and [hands slap together] gone just like that, out into space.

But he said he went back about a week later, and he parked his car in the same spot. And he was walking out to see if maybe there was any evidence on the ground that this thing had been there. Maybe something got dropped off of it, or maybe there was crop circle-type evidence – that kind of thing.

This Air Force truck comes rolling up – the dark blue with the yellow stencil on the side – “United States Air Force”. And a couple of military cops tell him he needs to get out of there and leave immediately, or they’re going to arrest him, and they’re going to impound his car. So he leaves.

* * * * * *

David: Well, isn’t it cool to have some really good illustrations – a guy that can back up his story with visuals like this?

Corey: And a photo – an actual photo.

David: Yeah. That’s a very interesting and bizarre-looking craft. Let’s just start by getting your thoughts as to, have you seen anything like that? What do you think its purpose might be? Is it just experimental? Was it actually used in operations, etc.?

Corey: I saw a lot of experimental craft, and a lot of them did say “Lockheed” on them, and they were faceted. And some of them were . . . I don’t know how to . . . You could manipulate or articulate different areas of the craft. So this sounds to me like it might have been one of their test craft, a concept craft.

David: So when you say ‘manipulate’ or ‘articulate’, you mean the craft can move . . .

Corey: Change configurations.

David: Shapeshift, basically.

Corey: Right.

David: What would be the value of something like that?

Corey: Well, if you have three different points that are being used, I guess, as like impulse-type engines – electrogravitic engines – usually, they have them on a type of a gimbal that you can manipulate them, turn them this way, and then pull you in that direction.

So that’s going to be kind of the same concept. And most of these that I read about were remotely controlled – the test craft. They didn’t necessarily have pilots.

David: Well, I’m thinking about the old James Bond movie where he’s got the car, and he drives it into the water, and then things all start shifting. And now that it’s in water, it’s got fins instead of tires.

Corey: Right.

David: Or it becomes a jet, and it flies, and wings come out. Is it possible that the shapeshifting has something to do with where it’s traveling, like if it’s in atmosphere or in space or something like that?

Corey: I would think it mostly has to do with controlling the attitude and pitch and yaw of the plane.

David: Just the actual manipulation.

Corey: Right.

David: Is it normal for people to be able to see one of these, or was this some kind of an accident that took place?

Corey: I think he described what most likely happened very well.

David: Right.

Corey: There was some sort of computer glitch, or they weren’t able to communicate with the craft, and it went into a loiter position. It was most likely programmed to go into a loiter position if there was an issue.

David: Now, earlier in this same episode, he was talking about how craft that are going to travel at Mach 17, that he couldn’t have these canards and winglets on the craft because they would get torn off.

The thing that strikes me is, you’re talking about a craft that has moving parts – a craft that has all these facets on it. It’s got an unusual shape.

Wouldn’t that type of a structure stress out under very high velocity and not be a good choice for a high speed aircraft?

Corey: No. Most . . . A lot of them are faceted – the craft that are supersonic.

David: Okay.

Corey: That’s actually a part of the design. It’s not only for deflecting radar, but they design them to be highly aerodynamic.

And I didn’t see anything that would cause a whole lot of drag on that craft.

David: But the joints . . . In order to have the joints be strong enough that things could move and then hold up under that velocity . . .

Corey: Most likely it moves into a different configuration.

David: Oh, for high speed?

Corey: For high speed. Right.

David: That, I can understand. So maybe the two Y-like sides of it would pull together.

Corey: Come together. Right. Right.

David: You mentioned before that the ICC – the Interplanetary Corporate Conglomerate – within the greater space program you were part of, was manufacturing and selling technology to over 900 extraterrestrial groups – 900 being the ones they were in regular contact with.

Would the ICC be testing anything on Earth, or would this be some other group besides them?

Corey: Well, the ICC controls a lot of these military-industrial-complex-type firms that contract this stuff. So they’re going to be overseeing it anyway and pulling in technology that they see that can be incorporated into higher technology craft.

There’s most likely an Area 51-type of Lockheed-Martin joint effort.

David: How might you use a craft like this? What would be it’s purpose? Is it an attack weapon?

Corey: Yeah. It probably has different weapons-platform packages you can put on it for reconnaissance and also weapons platform to make it a weapons platform. But most likely, that was a concept for another craft that . . . They’ll build three or four different concept craft to finally come up with one final version.

So that could have just been part of a process of creating another craft.

David: Well, that’s all the time we have for in this episode of “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m here with Corey Goode, and we are watching the very surprising testimony of one of the original Disclosure Project 39 whistleblowers, none other than Mark McCandlish. We’ll see you next time.

COSMIC DISCLOSURE: ALLYING WITH THE MIC SSP

Source: Sphere Being Alliance

David Wilcock: All right, welcome to “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m your host,David Wilcock, and we here with Corey Goode for another fascinating update. Without further ado, let’s hit the ground running.

Corey, welcome back to the show.

Corey Goode: Thank you.

David: More recently, you have started to interact with a Military-Industrial Complex Secret Space Program. There are a lot of movies out there that, according to Pete Peterson in one of the briefings he gave me recently, are showing hardware that this group actually possesses. And they’re putting it out in the open – a movie like “The Avengers” that has a flying aircraft carrier.

So what is your knowledge about how this MIC group is working with Hollywood in maybe getting us ready for things that they’re going to show us?

Corey: Well, according to Sigmund and everyone else I’ve talked to, they are planning on doing a slow, I guess, disclosure of a certain type of secret space program that, as I stated before, the DIA, NSA and Air Force have control of.

1 Corey Goode

And they plan on making this program known, which most of the activity happens within 500 miles of the Earth. They have space stations and manned satellites within that 500 mile range.

And that’s most of that zone that they have control over.

David: In Ronald Reagan’s own handwritten book of his memoirs – comes out in 1985 while he’s still President – he kind of let slip that he was aware that we could put 300 people up into orbit. And there was certainly nothing having to do with the space shuttle that would have anywhere near the capacity to hold 300 people.

So what was he talking about there?

Corey: He was referring to this program. This program . . . There are several decent sized space stations. There are manned satellites that have anywhere from three, six, eight men on duty, or I should say people on duty, that are serviced by these triangular craft. And they exchange personnel and supplies.

This is the information that our President recently received in a briefing.

David: Really?

Corey: He received a very low-level briefing and was upset because he knew it was a low-level briefing.

David: We have reason to believe that Trump’s uncle was involved with some of this classified information as well. What is your knowledge about that?

Corey: His uncle, whose name was John G. Trump, and was a MIT professor or scientist at the time, had actually been called to go out to Tesla’s property after he passed away to help remove all of the paperwork and experiments.

So this could very well explain some of the comments that the current President made very recently.

If you remember his inauguration speech, he mentioned a few interesting things about hidden technologies at the very end.

2 Screen Capture Trump

DONALD TRUMP – 2017 INAUGURATION SPEECH

“We stand at the birth of a new millennium, ready to unlock the mysteries of space, to free the Earth from the miseries of disease, and to harness the energies, industries, and technologies of tomorrow.”

David: So he’s describing technologies that could include free energy, that could include age reversal, or at least disease reduction, stuff that seems pretty out of the box.

And it’s a big cowboy move for him to make promises like that in his inaugural address. So granted, people would say, “Well, yeah, politicians, they just make stuff up all the time”, but is there something more to these statements?

Corey: Well, you take that his uncle was involved with this free energy-type technology, or allegedly, then he may have heard things down the family line about free energy being invented and available.

So he may have had that information. And when he received the briefings, he realized that he wasn’t getting the full information from his security advisers.

David: You seem pretty confident that Trump thinks that he only got low-level information when he was told about the Military-Industrial Complex Secret Space Program.

Corey: Right. He wasn’t told about any free energy, any of these healing technologies, in this briefing. But he sent a secret presidential memo, according to the information I received, to the Department of Energy, to the DoD and another group, requesting that, or basically demanding that they declassify over 1,000 patents . . .

David: Wow!

Corey: . . . out of 5,700 or so. And, I guess, some people may not know, but it’s documented that there are at least 5,700 patents that have been deemed harmful to national security.

David: Why would somebody invent something and then thousands and thousands of things are not being allowed to be shown to us?

Corey: Well, it comes to, I guess, the almighty dollar. Advanced energy technology would put the oil companies out of business. Advanced healing technology would put people even more powerful – the pharmaceutical conglomerates – out of business.

David: So what happened when the President asked for these patents to be declassified? That seems like a really strong and bold move.

Corey: Yeah. He received the typical pushback, and these groups said it would take at least 10 years for us to get all of this ready, but we’ll start working on it right away.

David: 10 years?

Corey: Yes, and . . .

David: That’s ridiculous.

Corey: He immediately pushed back that he wanted them released in the next three years.

David: You’ve mentioned Sigmund and that he has started to, perhaps, believe that what you’re saying is true. He’s taken hair samples from you. He’s proven that you were at these places that you say that you were.

How is he handling the fact that you may know something that’s true? What is he doing with that knowledge?

Corey: He basically hit the roof. He was extremely upset. He approached his superiors in a very upset manner and told them, “Listen. I feel like you’re not giving me the full information.”

Some of them became concerned because they felt like they weren’t getting the full data. So they have allowed him to start an investigation to investigate this Navy program.

David: ‘They’ the higher ups?

Corey: Yes. His superiors have then authorized him to begin this investigation, which he’s been undertaking.

David: What is the nature of that investigation?

Corey: To establish the details and existence of a Navy secret space program that is more active in the outer Solar System and other solar systems. They really want to find out the details of this alleged Navy Secret Space Program, because as he said to me – and I will clean it up – he said, “I used to think we were the tip of the spear, but I found out we’re the f**ing Coast Guard.”

David: Ha, ha, ha.

Corey: And not to put down the Coast Guard in any way, . . .

David: Sure.

Corey: . . . but he was talking about strategically. They thought they were the tip of the spear, keeping the planet safe and surveilling the planet, when they’re just basically the Coast Guard. And the Navy Secret Space Program and other programs are the tip of the spear.

David: Do they have anything beyond this 500-mile radius around the Earth that you said?

Corey: Yes, they have very small locations on the Moon, and I hear further out, but I haven’t verified where all of their assets are.

David: Anything on Mars?

Corey: I’ve heard rumor of that, but that I haven’t verified.

David: When you say, ‘very small’, how many personnel would be able to work there?

Corey: I haven’t had numbers, but I would assume it would be maybe 30 at the most.

David: Oh, wow!

Corey: Yeah, very small facilities.

David: Right. What might they be doing out there? What would be their objective of being there?

Corey: That’s their mandate, to protect the planet and surveil the planet.

David: So it’s like a surveillance and military defense outpost.

Corey: Right.

David: So the MIC group is Air Force. Is this the extent of the Air Force’s involvement in a space program, or is there another aspect to the Air Force that is in what you’re calling the Secret Space Program?

Corey: They’re involved in other aspects of other programs, but anything that they’re working on, they don’t communicate that information to this MIC Secret Space Program because they don’t have a need to know.

As a matter of fact, this MIC Secret Space Program, when they’re out in their space stations or flying around, they’re told that anything they see that flies by that’s much faster than what they are flying, they’re told that those craft are concept craft that their peers are developing.

David: Has Sigmund started to utilize you as an asset in any way to inform others who may be curious about whether this Navy Secret Space Program is real?

Corey: He had prepped me that he was going to start having me do briefings of various VIPs.

David: Oh!

Corey: So I was kind of preparing myself for that. And the last time we were here shooting Cosmic Disclosure, I was very shocked, and I believe you were too, when we saw in the same hotel we were staying in, this SAS forum was there.

It’s a Human Spaceflight and Exploration Forum.

David: Yeah, I have to say that walking around and seeing all that in physical form right in front of me, it did literally make the hairs stand up on both of my arms.

3 SAS Forum Screen Shot

Corey: Right. And I was shooting video while I was there for my vlog.

COREY SHOOTING VLOG

“What are the chances of the Human Spaceflight and Exploration Forum being at the same hotel as me?”

4 SAS Signage

And I captured pretty much all of the signs they had out in the corridor showing all the different energy technology, propulsion technology, they were going to be discussing. So it was a significant meeting.

David: Now, what happened as far as that meeting being set up? Was that in any way designed by the MIC group because we were here?

Corey: It’s pretty interesting, but I think that had been set up for a long time. It just seemed to work out well for getting me to talk to a few of the participants.

And I was very shocked early in the morning when I was supposed to come and shoot here. I had a knock at the door, and there was a person standing there.

And he greeted me with the proper information that would signify that he was in contact with Sigmund’s group, . . .

David: Wow!

Corey: . . . which caught me off guard. And I wasn’t expecting to do a briefing. I’m sitting in my sweatpants and a t-shirt.

So he asked me if I’m willing to do a briefing. And I was like, “Right now?”

And I looked, and there were four other people in the hallway, three of which were people that were going to soon come in my hotel room, which made me very nervous, who I would then give a briefing to.

And one of them introduced himself to me as a former astronaut who flew shuttle missions. I didn’t recognize him. He’s kind of a balding guy. He had a Masonic ring on.

David: Okay.

Corey: And I talked to him, and I talked to a physicist who was there. And he was a physicist engineer. And then there was another person that was part of the military-industrial complex that had a lot of connections.

And I started to give them the briefing, just like I have in Cosmic Disclosure from the very beginning.

And they all started looking very nervous and bewildered when I started with my story. Yeah, they were very uncomfortable.

5 Corey And David

David: What kinds of questions were these guys asking you, and how did you answer them?

Corey: The person who started hitting me with the most questions was the physicist engineer guy. And he started asking me questions way over my head.

And Ka’Aree had told me that she would assist me in these briefings when needed. I had no idea in what capacity. I thought she would feed me information.

David: Right.

Corey: All of a sudden, she started basically speaking through me and answering all of these questions. His eyes were getting bigger and bigger. And, finally, he stood up and threw his hands up in the air and said, “I cannot accept any of this.”

And he turned around and stormed out of the room.

David: So just so we’re clear and people don’t make things up online, you were still speaking in your own voice, not in a woman’s voice or something like that.

Corey: Right.

David: But you’re just able to hear words in your mind and then verbalize them?

Corey: Right. Yes.

David: Okay. When he stormed out of the room, what happens next?

Corey: It turned a nervous situation into a ‘I didn’t know what to do next’ situation. And the other two guys kind of humored me. I was nearly done anyway.

And that kind of truncated the conversation. I finished my briefing with the other two. They got up and left.

And I was told by the guy as he was walking out – that originally knocked on my door – that the next day to make myself available that evening to talk to some more people.

Well, apparently my briefing didn’t go over too well because the next day nobody showed up, and the SAS conference was gone.

David: It was gone.

Corey: Just poof, gone.

David: So then you go home the day after you have this meeting, and what happens to you then?

Corey: I was feeling a little weird before I flew home, and I started coughing up this . . . While I was still here in Boulder, I started coughing up this really weird uniform black stuff. And there was a lot of it. It was really weird. Nothing like that had really ever happened to me.

Then I also, as I was being flown home, we did have a rapid descent, which I believe I had some sort of reverse altitude sickness that contributed to the situation.

But hours after I got home, I ended up in the emergency room. I started having all these weird pains in my body. My joints were aching, and I couldn’t hardly breathe.

And what really concerned me is on my left shoulder, the joint really started hurting, and my chest started hurting, so I went to the hospital just to make sure I wasn’t having a heart attack.

David: Wow!

Corey: They slapped an EEG on me real quick and figured out that I wasn’t having a heart episode of any type. And then they put me back in the waiting room, and I left after a few people came in puking their guts out. So I kind of left against medical advice.

David: How did the briefings with Sigmund and his people continue after this initial event?

Obviously, it looks like somebody might have given you some kind of attack weapon. That’s one interpretation of this. Did you talk to him about that?

Corey: Not to him. Ka’Aree did tell me that there was some sort of an attack that was orchestrated – something was most likely put in my food or water – and that she didn’t think that it would have caused that large of an effect on me if I hadn’t have been exhausted already.

David: Did you ask Sigmund about this?

Corey: It came up. He said that it had nothing to do with him, and that they were investigating it.

David: So what happens next in terms of briefings that Sigmund brings you to? Do you talk to others, and how does it go?

Corey: Yes. And I can’t discuss the details of where it occurred, where these things occurred, but I was talking with anywhere from three . . . one, three, larger numbers of people – a total of about 28.

And I was giving the same briefing. Ka’Aree did not answer any of their questions in the further briefings. That kind of freaked the guy out a little bit.

David: Did she identify herself when she was talking through you?

Corey: She did, yeah.

David: Really? Okay. So that would have definitely been very uncomfortable for someone who’s not comfortable with this.

Corey: A scientific person. Yeah, they were not happy at all with that part. But when I’m giving these briefings, I had 13 people out of 28 stand up, throw their arms in the air, and storm out saying basically the same thing, “I can’t accept this.”

David: Hmm.

Corey: And the other people that remained just kind of . . . almost like they thought they were being punked. They’re looking around. Their heads jerking around looking at each other.

They’ve got these kind of stupid grins on their face. They were just having problems with the information. They were polite though.

But afterwards, they were telling their superiors, “What a waste of time. What a crazy story.”

So since then, Sigmund has put a pause on briefings.

David: How much do these guys know? Do they know about the MIC group?

Corey: Yes.

David: Do they know about extraterrestrials? Do they know about Atlantis and Antarctica?

Corey: No, no, no.

David: Pre-Adamites?

Corey: No. They don’t know any of that. They don’t have a need to know. They’re engineers. They just know about the programs they’ve dealt directly with.

And those usually don’t go anywhere further than this MIC SSP group that was basically kickstarted during the Star Wars Initiative.

David: Have you had any further meetings with the SSP Alliance since we last did our updates?

Corey: Since I first met Sigmund, and Sigmund started this hunt for these SSPAlliance groups, they’ve been keeping their heads down. So the only person that was a part of the SSP Alliance that I’ve been meeting on a regular basis is Gonzales.

And he’s been coming and picking me up in the Mayan craft.

6 Mayan Stone Vessel

David: What’s the reason for him showing up in that way?

7 Ancient Mayans Aboard Ship

What was the objective of these meetings?

Corey: Well, since he’s been staying with the Mayan people, I’ve been teleported to this giant stone craft somewhere out in orbit.

David: And what’s going on? What’s happening to you when you go up there?

Corey: I’ve been having some memory issues that concerned Gonzales. The last time I had reported I was up on the Mayan craft, and he had come up to me with this Magic 8 Ball-looking stone that he was scanning my head with, giving me concerned looks.

I’ve slowly started to find out what he was concerned about.

David: You had alluded to some big dark secret that has started to come up for you about your past that you found to be very upsetting that has very negative implications for your memory and your health.

Corey: Right. Many may recall that before I really started even talking to you, Gonzales – before I knew him – and the Mayans had appeared in my house after I’d had an eye surgery.

It was a detached retina surgery that the surgeon said was no different than astronauts’ eye. It took three times to repair it. It was a very traumatic surgery.

I had some sort of a full memory recall that was very upsetting. I was basically almost suicidal at the time. And the Mayan group brought me up to this vessel and had suppressed a lot of memories that had popped back.

They also disassociated the, I guess, emotional energy I have tied to certain memories. When I try to talk about all of this, I would go into some sort of a panic attack.

The information that they hid away is causing some of my memory issues that I’m having.

He explained to me that he found out that I had done two other 20-and-Backs . . .

David: Really!

Corey: . . . that I have really no memory of. That was hard for me to accept. It was very upsetting.

And he has been working with me to help mitigate the issues on my memory from these other 20-and-Backs. The only thing is I’ve been having sort of a bleed through. I’ve been having dreams, and they’ve been pretty dark.

David: Does this mean that you have 20-and-Backs that were not Solar Warden at all?

Corey: I don’t know what . . . I don’t know the details of them yet. And I don’t know if I’ll . . . Hopefully, I don’t want to process the information if it’s as disturbing as what has been popping into my dreams.

David: Given that the Mayans seem to have very advanced technology, what method did they use to heal you of these horrible things that were coming back in your mind, and the damage that it was resulting in?

Corey: Right after the eye surgery, what they had done is they had further suppressed those two 20-and-Backs scenarios to where I would have no memory of them. And it had unintended consequences.

The way the mind compartmentalizes things, there was starting to be some bleed through. And there were some memories that were associated with my first 20-and-Back. So when they truncated those memories, there was something missing.

So my mind was trying to fix what was missing, and I started having memory issues and disturbing flashbacks.

So originally they had taken those memories and suppressed them further.

What they’re doing right now is, I’m going up, and they’re helping mitigate the issues. They have this free will thing. They won’t totally fix different ailments of mine, but they are mitigating them so I can continue with this mission.

David: Have you had any other meetings with the Blue Avians, and, if so, what have they been telling you?

Corey: Yeah, I’ve had . . . The meetings with Tear-Eir have slowed down dramatically. And that’s happened before. It’s kind of been an ebb and flow as things are occurring.

David: Right.

Corey: And most recently, Tear-Eir has told me that we’ve entered into a very important three-year window as a species, that we’re creating as a species the, I guess, reality that we’re going to experience together.

That this three-year window is very important – how we, I guess, exert ourselves to try to get disclosure is very important.

It’s very important to start doing things like mass meditations, anything that can kickstart that hundredth monkey effect within the rest of our subconsciousness.

David: The mention of three years is interesting because Jacob, one of the other guys who was a very, very knowledgeable space program insider, but wouldn’t tell me everything he knows, as you and I both know who he is.

He spoke a lot about 2020. That was one of the key windows that he was always describing. And that’s exactly what you’re saying.

Corey: Yeah, 2020. Gonzales has made jokes about 20/20 vision and 2020 being an important part of this transition. So 2020 . . . There’s some importance tied to it for sure.

David: Given the fact that Tear-Eir is being that specific, and that as we’ve talked about in many other episodes, we’re expecting some kind of solar energy flash, this would imply that it’s definitely not happening prior to 2020. Would you say that?

Corey: I’d agree.

David: Okay. But the window of 2020 to 2024, because you say they’ve also added a year on . . .

Corey: Yes.

David: Could you talk about that window? And what do you think might be going on with 2020 and that period of time?

Corey: I’m not sure what’s going to occur, other than we’re making some sort of a decision as a people in that time period. It’s important.

A lot of these groups that are trying to massage and muddle things are kind of sitting back now. Pretty much, the ball’s in our court.

How we’re going to proceed from now on, a lot of it has to do with how we process this new information, and how we react to it.

David: There was a blueprint for partial disclosure that seemed pretty obvious.

8 Tom DeLonge

Tom DeLonge, the multi-Grammy winning lead singer of Blink 182, arguably the biggest rock band of the 1990s, is saying that he met with 10 different military insiders. It came out in some of these WikiLeaks data dumps that actually verified that he was having meetings, and who he was meeting with.

9 Gods Man And War

And now he’s got the second of his two books of the “Sekret Machines” series that gets into Nazi bell craft and all kinds of stuff, but basically seems like the MIC space program. What’s going on with that initiative in light of all this stuff that you’re now bringing to the surface?

Corey: They’re, I guess, tacitly proceeding with this partial disclosure narrative, but at the same time, heavily investigating all of this new information, which could affect the plans for doing this partial disclosure of the MIC Secret Space Program.

David: Is there the same degree of support for the Tom DeLonge initiative now as there was before, or has that changed?

Corey: On the face, yes, they are proceeding, but many, especially in the control structure, they want to know the results of the investigation Sigmund’s doing. They’re very interested in this investigation.

David: The Vault 7 documents had a big build up for them going on where WikiLeaks was putting out all these cryptic tweets, and people were trying to figure out what was going on. There was a real big buzz.

And then it comes out in the open, and it’s all about the CIA. And they’re saying there’s 8,700 documents in there.

What are we seeing with Vault 7, and can we expect more of that kind of stuff to happen?

Corey: Yes. I was officially told that this document or data dump that I talked about in the first couple of seasons of Cosmic Disclosure has finally started to occur in earnest.

That there were going to be further clusters of very uncomfortable information that are going to hit the Internet.

And as we have time to digest that, maybe even before we have time to fully digest that batch, another one would come. And then another one would come – with in between those, the Cabal doing a few tit for tat releases of data of their own, but nothing as significant as what the Alliance is leaking.

So we’re in the beginning of this document dump, and there’s a lot more coming.

David: Are we still expecting there to be some sort of new financial system once the dust settles? Might there be an economic collapse? What about that, just briefly?

Corey: I’m not seeing any information about an imminent collapse. It sounded like, until we have some sort of a disclosure, they are keeping everything stable.

So at a future point, there will more than likely be some sort of a change in the financial system since it’s going to be exposed that the financial system that we have right now is completely corrupt.

David: When this financial change happens, what will the effect be for the average person?

Corey: A more level playing field. That’s the goal. A more level playing field for all of these different nations to start interacting with each other. And hopefully, when we get to that point, we’ll also have technologies that we’ll be sharing with all of these other countries, which will bring us closer together an into a new era.

David: If these technologies do get declassified, have you gotten any evidence as to how that will take place?

In other words, are they going to be officially announced, or are they just going to start to bubble up, or how is it going to happen?

Corey: It’s going to occur in the data dumps, more than likely. And then officials with egg on their face are going to either have to confirm or deny the existence. That is the information I have.

David: Well, I want to thank you [Corey] for continuing to fight the good fight. And I want to thank you [audience] for supporting us by watching this show and being subscribers.

I’m David Wilcock. This is “Cosmic Disclosure”, and I thank you for watching.

COSMIC DISCLOSURE: ASTRAL PROJECTION AND OUR PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE WITH WILLIAM TOMPKINS

Source: Sphere Being Alliance

David Wilcock: All right. Welcome back to “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m your host,David Wilcock, and I’m here with Corey Goode.

And in this episode, we have more of the very stunning new information coming to us from our World War II veteran insider William Tompkins.

* * * * * *

ASTRAL PROJECTION

William Tompkins: When I was just a boy, and I was, like, seven, eight and nine years old, I used to fly a lot. Now, I didn’t have an airplane. I just flew.

We were living in Santa Monica. We were living in Hollywood, and I flew a lot, mostly at night, but a couple of times in class, in school, recess, I’d just go behind the building, and I’d take a flight.

And I’d sometimes . . . I’d put my arms up, but most times I’d just go out.

1 William Tompkins

And so I could fly all over Hollywood, San Fernando Valley, go down to the beach at Santa Monica, fly up to Malibu, fly all the way down to San Pedro, look at the Navy ships and the dry docks in San Pedro, and fly over LAX and come back.

I had a hard time flying over LAX. There was a lot of stuff going on, so I kept myself away from the airports as much as I could.

A few times, after I’d had fun just flying around low key – and in particular, it’s more fun at night with the lights – I’d just shoot out, out into the galaxy. And I flew way above 186,000 miles a second, way, way above that.

2 In Space

And it took everybody a long time to figure out that even the Germans could fly faster than that, and certainly the extraterrestrials could, okay? But what I am saying I do, is I fly out there.

And one time I flew into . . . it the admiral’s command ship of a Reptilian space navy. I flew right into his office. I could see, hear and smell everything that they were saying.

To me, it came to me in English, just like when I flew one time over Russia. Admiral Sergey Gorshkov had been building a whole series of futuristic ships that don’t even look like they’re from the planet because they were built with stealth.

I flew over the base, Vladivostok base, and I actually flew around the base. I went down, looked into the edge of the construction facilities, came back up high, flew into Sergey Gorshkov’s office, and I could see, hear and smell the coffee in his office.

3 Sergey Gorshkov

And his language . . . which language? English. All of them were talking English. Okay?

I actually got into a research group in the Navy where I was an adviser to this psychic type of whatever that I’m doing here.

* * * * * *

David: So that’s some pretty interesting stuff there. We’re hearing that he has been able to do this ever since he was seven or eight years old.

And Corey, one of the things that jumped out at me, I was five years old when I had an out-of-body experience. I woke up floating over my body, and it was the event that got me to study ESP.

So I started to do psychic experiments by the time I was seven years old. I wanted to get another chance. I was only able to do it once when I was a kid.

Corey: Yeah, I thought it was commonplace. I thought everyone could do it. I was doing it . . .

David: This was something that happened to you often?

Corey: Mm-hmm.

David: From what age?

Corey: The age of four and five years old it was spontaneously happening, and then I was able to control it through my youth.

We’d be on long car drives. I’d be bored, and instead of asking, “Are we there yet?”, I would just project myself outside of the car, and I would float and fly above the signs as we passed, above the overpasses.

And I thought it was something everyone could do.

David: Is there something about extraterrestrial lineage in the soul that makes it more likely that people will be able to do this?

Corey: Well, let’s say that, in a previous life, you were a more advanced extraterrestrial. You had advanced consciousness abilities, and you agreed to be incarnated here on Earth as a human.

We still have that same oversoul that has the same knowledge. So that knowledge has to slowly trickle into this conscious being that we agreed to become.

David: Is there any reason to believe that if a person goes through excessive trauma, that that trauma might propel them to be able to develop astral projection?

Corey: Yes. That’s actually a technique that is used in the programs. They will cause people to astrally project by inflicting extreme trauma upon them.

David: How does that end up working? Why do you project out of your body then?

Corey: That is a . . . It’s an escape or a protection mechanism that our psyche has. It’s a disassociative ability that our psyche, and we have spiritually, to disassociate and divorce ourself from what is occurring.

And once they program a person through trauma to be able to project out of their body, then they start training them how to do it for operations.

David: And what would be an example of an astral projection?

Corey: Very similar to remote viewing. It’s going to be going to gather intelligence at a remote location.

David: Well, it seems that this is a very ancient technique, isn’t it? I mean, this is something that mystery schools have talked about for a long time.

Corey: Right, it’s a heavily suppressed ability that all humans have.

4 Builders Of The Adytum

David: One of the things that, maybe, our viewers are not aware of, there is one particular secret society called BOTA, or Builders of the Adytum, and the Adytum, believe it or not, is a room that has an altar with a sacred book inside with sacred knowledge.

5 BOTA

And the room is completely walled off. It’s usually a cylindrical room, all bricked in. You can’t get in at all except in your astral body.

And so the key for the initiate is, can you astrally make it into that room and then read the book inside the Adytum, and only if you can accurately recount what the book says have you then become a true initiate.

Have you ever heard of anything like that?

Corey: Well, I mean, there were similar exercises that we were all put through.

David: Really?

Corey: Yeah. You would have to identify an object in another room, its color. It wasn’t as . . . We weren’t reading books, but you know, we were children.

And they would have us identify toys or paintings or different things in another room that was walled off, and that no one in the experiment, at that time, knew what was in there either. So you weren’t getting psychic hits, or you weren’t front loaded in anyway.

David: Some people might be inclined to dismiss Tompkins’ testimony based on the idea that he’s saying, for example, he went into the office of an admiral of the Reptilian navy, and that he’s hearing things in English when they clearly are not speaking in English.

And the same thing with the Russian where they had these unconventional aircraft, stealth aircraft.

Corey: I have heard of that before, that your mind – your astrally projected astral body – is able to interpret other languages to the language that the mind uses.

David: So there’s sort of a natural translation function going on.

Corey: Not all the time, but some people have that innate ability.

You can’t just astrally project to a lot of these black bases. They’re protected by people that have remote influencing abilities and are enhanced by technology.

I’ve heard them called “Those Who Scatter”. They’ll scatter your thoughts.

Also, shadow beings that will protect facilities from astral projectors. Astral projectors will go try to get into a facility, and all of a sudden they’ll get this real dark being that’s now chasing them all over the place.

So they do have astral security.

David: All right. So in our next segment, we’re going to have Tompkins blast us out into the cosmos, and specifically, we’re going to hear what he has to say about settlements on the Moon.

* * * * * *

OUR MOON

Tompkins: Well, first of all, it’s not your Moon, and secondly, it’s not a moon. It’s a command center for a region of this part of the Milky Way galaxy. That’s what it is.

6 Tompkins Showing Location

And it doesn’t rotate. Everybody forgets the thing doesn’t turn. Okay? So it’s not a moon. It’s not YOUR moon. It’s a command center with probably 25~35 different civilizations in there, all of which operate out here for this part of the Milky Way galaxy.

And, yes, some of those people actually are at war with each other, but they have personnel living here. Their families live here. The kids are getting educated. They get young. They get older. They get married. It’s a big hunk. It’s a big facility.

* * * * * *

David: So Corey, what was your reaction as you saw this segment just now?

Corey: It’s exactly what I had stated in the past. There are a number of factions that have territory on the Moon that they operate in. And there will be blood enemies for millennia that are operating within a kilometer or two of each other, I mean, groups that you do not get together no matter what.

David: Now, he mentioned 25 to 35 civilizations. I’m curious how well that dovetails with what you’ve heard?

Corey: That’s probably about right. There are a lot of the genetic farmer races that have ‘observation posts’, is what they call them.

And they do use it as an observation post and a station that they go back and forth doing these genetic experiments on us from.

David: Now, one of the things that jumps out at me was, I kind of thought of this, like you said, as an outpost or maybe a stopover point, whereas he’s saying that you have families living there. You have children being educated there, growing up in these lunar bases.

So we are dealing with what would appear to be like a permanent housing for potentially large populations of people from several, you know, 25~35 civilizations.

Corey: I mean, it would be similar to us having a marine base in Europe. The soldiers have families that are there with them. It’s going to be one of those scenarios.

I had not heard intelligence of families and children. The information I had received was that they were more sort of like military outposts.

David: When I went to Japan, I went to Tokyo, the main city, and it’s amazing when you’re there, and you look out, and you see something that kind of looks like Manhattan, but it is so big.

Tokyo is so incredibly large, there’s such a density of buildings that you can’t even see to the point where that highly compressed density of buildings stops.

So when we have a city of that size, it’s a very small geographical footprint, but you could potentially have 20, 30 million people living there.

I’m wondering if the level of development on the Moon in some of these territories these people have is sufficient enough that you could have a population that large in a small space.

Corey: It’s all about technology. If we were not so technologically developed, it wouldn’t be possible to have a city like Tokyo.

They have mastered all of the energy needs, the protein requirements that people may need, everything that’s needed to process waste on a much more efficient level than we are.

So, yeah, they’re able to have a much higher population density than we are.

David: Are there immigration requirements that would prevent anyone who is not part of their indigenous culture from being able to even see the inside of these cities?

Corey: Absolutely. You don’t have one group going into the cities of others. I mean, it’s like the UN or kind of like how Antarctica is carved up for all these different countries.

It is undisputed territory, and they do not cross over or invade.

The Moon was made sort of like a Switzerland zone, a conflict free zone, after some major, major battles that happened in our history. And they left some of the remnants of that battle on the Moon as a testament and a reminder of the battles and how bad it got.

These are the conflicts that led to these treaties being signed between the different genetic farmer groups, some of these more negative groups that we’re talking about, that allows them to live and operate in close proximity without being at war all the time.

David: Pete Peterson has an insider who came from the Russian space program, who told him that if we were to be able to see the dark side of the Moon – which as Tompkins noted, it’s always against our view. We can’t ever look on that side – that it would look like Manhattan at night.

Meaning the entire circular area of the backside of the Moon, if that circle could be turned towards us, the whole thing at night is just literally covered with lights.

Corey: Yeah, there’s one particular, I think it’s called Luna City, that has a lot of light.

But you have to also note that they have a type of cloaking that goes over their buildings and structures that looks just like the rest of the arid terrain of the Moon.

David: Oh, wow!

Corey: So you could fly over and just see craters when actually that’s a projection over a base or an outpost

David: That is interesting because, as we know, retired Major Bob Dean, according to what I heard from Jacob, my insider who met up with him at a Project Camelot event and recognized him from the Secret Space Program . . .

Corey: I’m pretty sure he did at least one 20-and-Back.

David: Yeah.

Corey: That’s my opinion.

David: But one of the things that Dean said while he was talking to Jacob was that there was an island in the Pacific where half of the island looks like an island, but it’s a cloak, and that there’s a very important base there.

And if it wasn’t for this hologram that makes it look like it’s just an island in the ocean, you’d see this amazing thing.

Corey: Oh, yeah, they can disappear entire islands.

David: Wow! So this is stuff that could be used on Earth right now.

Corey: Absolutely.

David: You can confirm that.

Corey: Yeah. It can be used over Antarctica. It could be used any number of places.

David: All right. Now, he also mentioned that the Moon is a command center. How much of this is also inside?

Corey: Almost all of it. The majority of it is under the surface of the Moon in these deep huge fissures, cracks and lava tubes.

David: And one last thing was you mentioned that we have some new art of the Lunar Operations Command.

Corey: Yes. Yes.

7 LOC Early

If you look at this image, this is an image that I commissioned that is a 3D rendering of the swastika-looking arrangement of buildings that . . . how the LOCoriginally looked.

8 LOC Early 2

David: Okay.

Corey: And then I have another image that shows how it was built out to cover up the swastika.

9 LOC Current

David: Interesting. All right. So in this last segment, we have one final set of words from Tompkins for us in this episode, and this is his statements on how he sees our place in the universe based on his own personal and stunning insider knowledge and direct experience with extraterrestrial contact, including Nordics. Let’s take a look.

* * * * * *
OUR PLACE IN THE GALAXY

Tompkins: We’ve now accepted that we have 200 trillion galaxies. Not million. We have 200 trillion galaxies out there.

I mean, what . . . We are so naïve of what’s out there. It’s totally unbelievable. Millions and millions of planets out there – very small things and things that make our Star look like kid stuff.

Our star is just a little dot over on the side – even our galaxy.

And while we’re talking about that, this subject comes up all the time, and it’s an appropriate time to say it.

If we can visualize us as the center of the Milky Way galaxy, we’re reaching out like this with our arm.

Everybody in this room, and all the audience that’s going to be watching this, has to realize this is one of the arms of the Milky Way galaxy. You’re located at my first joint.

10 Tompkins Shows Joint

You’re not down . . . Wait a minute! You’re not down where the action is. Even in the Milky Way galaxy, you’re not downtown where ALL the action is.

You are out here at this tip, which in time, you’re going to get thrown off because the galaxy rotates. The galaxy rotates, all of them do.

They rotate, so the tips get thrown off. Other galaxies come by, and they pick up that stuff. So you may be going to the next galaxy several weeks from now. Okay? Takes quite a while. [Smiles]

So to realize that you’re not downtown, you’re just one of the castoffs.

This little Solar System thing that you’ve got here – it’s . . . You’re out in the boonies.

11 Universe

And it’s interesting that we have to address who we are, where we are, and what we know and realize that the universe is unbelievable. And so opportunities for young people in this country, all over the world, to be involved in this commercially, okay . . .

Come on. Forget about carrying a big gun. There’s too much of that. That’s not the right step. You’ve got to have the largest . . . enough to be able to stop it, and this is where the Navy has been saying this for 240 years. If you have a large enough navy, they’ll back off.

You don’t need to use a shooting navy. But if you don’t carry that, people are going to really make it hard for you.

And so to me, I think we’re just starting. We’ve just got the tip of the iceberg of where we can go and what we can do, and it’s unbelievable opportunities.

* * * * * *

David: All right. So, wow! That’s a very sobering reminder of the awesomeness of our cosmic identity.

I’ve been quoting from the latest NASA studies, which have revealed that there are as many Earth-like watery planets in our universe as there are grains of sand on Earth, on the entire planet. All the grains of sand put together – there’s a watery planet like Earth out in the universe for all of that.

So it’s a staggering number.

Corey: It’s a template that’s all over the cosmos.

David: And these watery planets in this theoretical mock-up that NASA has put out, they’re looking at, okay, well, maybe one out of a hundred of them is going to have life, and then maybe one out of a hundred of those is going to reach intelligent life.

But based on what you’ve told me before, it seems like intelligent life for a watery planet is far more prevalent than that one out of one out of 100 thing.

Corey: Well, yeah, and also, you have to understand that each solar system has its own dynamics. So there are going to be times of developed societies in the solar system, and then there are going to be cataclysms – cycles that occur.

Then they’ll have long periods of having more basic life that inhabit these planets.

David: And if our conventional estimate of the age of the universe is about 13.8 billion years – there’s different opinions, but that’s one of the common ones – then that would mean that there could be civilizations much older than ours that already reached very high technology.

Corey: Oh, yeah. Come and gone.

David: So the idea that we are the only intelligent life in the universe, in light of all these new statistics, is totally ridiculous.

Corey: Yes, it’s beyond ridiculous. It’s arrogant. You have the right mix of minerals, distance from the sun, the planet being seeded with the correct enzymes or proteins from comets. Then you have all the building blocks for basic life, and it’s everywhere.

12 Herschel Telescope Article

And now that they’ve found out that the stars produce water, . . .

David: Right.

Corey: . . . that’s where a lot of the water’s coming from.

13 Solar Wind Creates Water

And the Sun is also producing the harmonic wave that allows life to come about.

David: Yeah, this is something I’ve done a lot of scientific validation of. If people also watch “Wisdom Teachings”, they’re going to hear, in many of my DNA episodes, astonishing proof.

We went into Wilhelm Reich and how you can, in fact, generate life just out of electrifying a rock and water. All you have to do is that, and you’ll eventually get life to form.

Corey: Right, and also where in the galaxy this solar system is is also going to depend . . . is going to dictate how advanced and how quickly life advances or progresses.

More towards the center of the galaxy, things are occurring a lot quicker. Time is occurring differently.

There’s a lot more going on, civilization wise, towards the center of galaxies than in the cosmic boondocks that he was talking about.

David: I did find that fascinating because my insider Jacob, who was very extensively knowledgeable about the Secret Space Program, claimed to have been to over 200 different off-planet sites, to have seen over 400 different types of extraterrestrials, and he was the guy who gave me a lot of information that correlated so well with what you’ve brought up.

Jacob was telling me that, yes, the center of the galaxy is so much more advanced, and there’s so much more going on there that it’s almost incomprehensible to us.

Corey: Time flows differently. Energy, everything . . . Towards the center of the galaxy, things are occurring, from our perspective, much quicker.

David: Now, Tompkins also mentioned that there were commercial opportunities. It’s not just about going out there with a gun.

What do you think could happen in a post-Full Disclosure world where people will have the ability to potentially even have a portal in their home, and in the course of one day maybe even travel far outside our Solar System, meet with other people, travel to other places? What kind of society is that? What kind of businesses could we start to develop at that point?

Corey: Well, there’s already a lot of commerce going on between our Solar System and the other solar systems, but it’s being controlled by a very militant and fascist group.

If it’s put in the hands of the people, we’re going to be able to do this – start bartering – from our own best interests.

Right now, a lot of the people in the secret space programs are somewhat forced into it.

When it becomes an all volunteer navy-type situation for space, then we’re going to have people that are bringing more creative energy to their mission. And if it’s not a military mission, it’s going to be more of a mission for commerce.

David: Some people watching this show might be cynics, and they would say, “Well, what could we possibly be offering to any other cultures? We’re like Neanderthals, troglodytes, in comparison to these people.

“Even if we developed the portal capability, even if we could pop over to a solar system outside of our own and visit an advanced culture, if they’ve got gigantic buildings made out of transparent aluminum crystal, what are we going to do going in there they would possibly want from us?”

Corey: Well, there are going to be some civilizations that are so much more advanced, there’s nothing that we’re going to really have except for maybe some biologicals or genetic stock that we are willing to trade from our planet.

A lot of them, that’s what they’re interested in. So the more super advanced civilizations . . . we’re not really going to have much that they’re going to want to trade.

But there are a lot of civilizations that are very close to ours. Our level of development is similar to theirs to a point to where they’re buying vessels from us.

We’re engineering technology that nonterrestrial groups covet, they want, and they’re willing to trade for it because we’re known as very diligent and brilliant engineers.

David: Could there also be job opportunities for people who might be, let’s say, artists or musicians or teachers?

Corey: Absolutely.

David: That kind of thing?

Corey: Yeah, I would expect a lot of exchange programs when it comes to the arts, because it’s . . . All the planets have some form of art.

David: And how much of a wide diversity are we looking at of places where artists or teachers or musicians could go and volunteer their services once this opens up?

Corey: Just about every planet that has a human-type civilization. The reason that they tell us not to call them nonterrestrials, or ETs – they tell us to call them people – is because there’s very little difference, genetically, between us and them.

David: Right.

Corey: They are people, and people have desires. They have interests. We can cross-pollinate our sciences, our arts, with other star systems that are interested in our art.

David: So there’s a potential in our future where we could have educational programs, where we’re going to help people to get to a point where they would be welcomed as diplomats, ambassadors, teachers, sharers of knowledge, but it’s going to require us to level up our spiritual maturity before we’re ready for that.

Corey: We’re going to continue to be sort of isolated until we go through this consciousness renaissance. Once we do, and we’re not as damaged, we don’t have as strong of PTSD, then we’re going to be able to go out and interact with them.

David: Well, that’s a very fascinating and hopeful message.

We’ll see you next time here on “Cosmic Disclosure”. Special episode with William Tompkins. I’m David Wilcock here with Corey Goode, and we thank you for watching and supporting us.

COSMIC DISCLOSURE: VIEWER QUESTIONS PART 7

Source: Sphere Being Alliance

David Wilcock: Welcome to “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m your host, David Wilcock. I’m here with Corey Goode, our insider’s insider. How are you doing, Corey?

Corey Goode: Doing well, thank you.

David: Welcome back to the show. All right, first question is from Schmitz_K, and it is as follows:

“Love the viewer questions. I also have a question of my own. Do the SSP vessels produce gravity or are they a zero G environment? And is gravity severely reduced in the LOC?”

Was there gravity when you were on the ship?

Corey: Yes. They have plates on the floor that create a gravitational field, but also within the bubble of the torsion field, it creates an environment to where they can control the gravity better for some reason.

1 Corey Goode

Now, the lower level SSPs, they don’t have all of the artificial gravity. So you’ll see the monkey bars on the ceiling that you use, you know, for getting around.

David: Oh. If we go back to the German Bell craft, did they have zero G environment when they were flying in those?

Corey: Yes.

David: They did?

Corey: Yeah.

David: The second half of the question was about the LOC. Is there severely reduced gravity in the LOC? I guess they’re thinking about the Moon’s gravity being less than ours and how the astronauts supposedly bouncing around.

Corey: Right. On the LOC, there was one G of gravity.

David: Oh.

Corey: Now, there are some of the other surface bases that they have that we haven’t talked about so much where there is no gravity.

David: Oh, no gravity?

Corey: No gravity, except for, well, the Moon’s natural gravity.

David: Right, okay.

Corey: Right.

David: Okay. We have a question from Marcus O., and it is:

“I would like to hear Corey going into more about the work he’s done on himself, also more on his high vibratory diet and what work exactly we could be doing on ourselves. I understand that he doesn’t want to come across as a leader, and that we shouldn’t be ‘following him’, but some of us would like advice and extra information.

“For people who are trying, i.e. with diet and meditation, what would be some good suggestions for both? It would be nice to hear more about the work we should be doing for this conscious renaissance.”

Corey: Well, there is a component to this situation that I’m having my vibratory state augmented just by being in the presence of some of these higher vibratory beings.

David: [David shakes his head in agreement.]

Corey: And I’m getting personal one-on-one advice from them, and it’s very uncomfortable advice. About 80% of my communications with them involve them shining lights where I’ve refused to shine lights.

David: So for somebody who isn’t having beings show up in the room with them and giving them a higher vibration just by being in their presence, what are some of the practical steps of people actually achieving that forgiveness?

Corey: Less looking out here for solutions and a lot of introspection. We all have the traumas in life that we think we’ve put behind us. We don’t have to deal with them anymore.

Well, it’s time that we start, you know, digging them up, holding them up to the light, and, you know, doing the hard work. This has been very difficult.

A lot of people are like, you know, “You’re getting this one-on-one contact. How luck are you.”

It’s very, very difficult. It’s demoralizing at times.

My ego has been so, I guess, massaged in – not in a way to make it bigger but to make me more humble.

Anytime you begin to think highly of yourself, they come, “Wait a minute. Look at this, this and this.”

And you know, it puts you back in your place and puts you back on the path.

David: So the question also revolved around dietary issues, and there’s another one that we have in here, I think, that is going to cover that as well.

So he was specifically saying he’s already trying to do a healthy diet, but what are some of the suggestions that might be of assistance?

Corey: Well, that is definitely a process as well. One of the things I was being told, especially by Tear-Eir, was that I was not practicing what I was preaching.

I was talking about high vibration diets, going home and eating corn dogs and all these nitrates, . . .

David: Right.

Corey: . . . and it was wreaking havoc on my body. I mean, you can see from the first season, you know, how unhealthy I looked.

David: It’s amazing, the transformation of how much you’ve changed. And it really did seem like once you had that contact with Ka’Aree, and you touched her hands, and then you had this mind-meld that something really triggered in you at that point.

Corey: You know, it’s a difficult path. Each person’s path is different.

I mean, you have to deal with your old traumas. You have to deal with your current behavior that is destructive.

If you don’t do that, no matter how spiritually advanced you think you are, you’re just deluding yourself.

You have to work and take care of all these little earthly issues that are acting like a parachute to hold you back.

David: So since the question also related to diet, I want to bring up the subject of the weapons system, something that several insiders have talked to me about, the idea that the Cabal itself actually has put in certain ingredients in food that is intended to reduce lifespan, decrease happiness, increase weight, all this kind of stuff.

So are you personally aware of the idea that the food system that we have is being weaponized in certain ways?

Corey: Yeah, our entire environment has been weaponized against us. That’s why we’ve got to mitigate all of those weapons as much as we can.

And in my case, I ended up moving to a vegetarian diet. I was pretty much forced to by getting food poisoning.

David: Right.

Corey: So I was real slow to start practicing what I was preaching.

David: Okay, so the next question is from Sedona Visionary, and it says:

“Corey has mentioned more than once that he uses a technique for releasing negative entities from his energy field. I would really like to know the how-tos. I know he said he does it using the name of Jesus Christ, but there must be a little more to it than that that would be helpful for people watching this show to use.”

Corey: Once I realized that I did have entity attachments, I went back, of course, to my background and how I was raised, and I called on the name of Jesus and it worked. They just fled the scene of the crime.

David: Right.

Corey: Later on, I was reinfected with entities by Mara, one of the Inner Earth people that had visited me without my permission.

David: The negative being, in this case.

Corey: Right. In that case, Ka’Aree removed them with some sort of tone from a crystal, and they fled exactly in the same way.

2 Ka Aree Removing Entities

3 Entities Leaving

I guess the power that I assigned to the name of Jesus gave it some sort of a vibrational strength with my will and my belief that the name of Jesus would clear me.

So I say that because the tone, the vibration of that crystal, was what drove them out of me the second time.

4 Ka Aree And Entity

So there has to be other methods of doing it, of course. I’m not going to say you have to go to the Inner Earth and have a crystal waved above you or call in the name of Jesus.

People can do it on their own, but it’s very difficult. A lot of times, these entities will act like they’ve left, you know, “I’m leaving”, you know, do the little walking noise and then sneak right back around and come in.

The best thing you can do is just make your body of a vibratory nature that it’s very difficult for these beings to coexist with you.

David: We have one from Merwitch Mama. Ha, ha.

“Why are we still calling Gonzales, ‘Gonzales’? If he’s already been compromised and no longer even on Earth, why can’t we know who he really is? It would go a long way toward getting more people on board with this.”

Corey: He has family here that I wouldn’t want to put in danger. I’ve already outed him, and it caused a lot of problems with the Alliance, the SSP Alliance. Half of the command and control structure will not show their heads, you know, for command and control purposes.

David: Right.

Corey: So I’m not going to do anything to cause any more damage.

David: I totally agree. Wanderer 1027:

“I am confused as to why the Alliance is more concerned about the Cabal exposing the dirt that the Cabal has on them than they are about giving humanity Full Disclosure. Should we care what individual factions of the Alliance have done more than our own ascension?

“Also, why, Corey, are you concerned about the social effects of Full Disclosure? Society’s already broken. We experience a dark night of the soul for a reason, don’t we?”

So, I guess the first question is, “Why is the Alliance more concerned about the Cabal exposing the dirt on them than Full Disclosure?”

Corey: Well, because they will be standing next to them in tribunals. They were carrying out orders that were given to them for a long time. And in the process, many crimes against humanity were committed.

David: Stuff that would be so extremely compromising that people wouldn’t feel very forgiving?

Corey: Absolutely not.

David: So regarding this idea that the social effects of Full Disclosure, the question seems to be confronting you as if you are concerned about Full Disclosure breaking down society, and they’re saying society is already broken. This is just going to give us a useful dark night of the soul if we get Full Disclosure.

Corey: People have all these ideas about what disclosure is going to be if there’s a Full Disclosure event. And it is going to be more than a dark night of the souls. Many people are going to die in the process. It’s going to be chaos.

It’s not going to be people holding hands singing “Kumbaya”. It’s going to be . . . We are demanding one of the most difficult times in our life. We’re demanding we need this disclosure, but we don’t fully understand how difficult it’s going to be.

I mean, there are countries that have been victimized by the Cabal are going to find out a bunch of information. They’re going to want to go to war with Cabal countries.

It’s going to be a mess. It’s not just going to be people that won’t get out of bed and eat because their religion has been basically proven as wrong.

David: Right.

Corey: It’s far more reaching than that.

David: So it would seem, then, that even a Full Disclosure, the most ethical way to do it would be in a series of stages where there’s some acclimation along the way.

Corey: That’s what the negotiations have been all about. The Alliance, the Earth Alliance, they believe that it’s irresponsible to just drop it all on the people. They think it should be, you know, put out in a slow way.

But in that case, if you don’t put it all out at once, then you’re always going to have somebody that’s wanting to hold back little bits and pieces.

So I’m for Full Disclosure, but what I’m saying is, everyone out there, be careful what you wish for because it’s going to be a lot more difficult even for those in the UFO community than what we think.

David: Well, if you think about, Corey, our own creative process when we were developing “Cosmic Disclosure” with the folks here at Gaia, we were looking at a lot of information that you could tell us about Draco and things like that that were VERY disturbing things.

And we did structure the show so that that kind of stuff came in later episodes after we’d had multiple episodes to try to front load the positive at the beginning.

So do you think there’s a way that this could happen with Full Disclosure or are you saying it’s like a data dump and it just all kind of comes blasting out?

Corey: That’s what Full Disclosure is, is a complete dump of everything.

David: Right.

Corey: And everything . . . I mean, there’s going to be a lot of disturbing information.

David: We have another question now from Akhaishimray, and it says, and we’ve heard this one before:

“Are you not allowed to film your interaction with the Blue Avians or Mica or even just a view aboard one of the spheres? And if so, why? A 360-degree camera would be ideal since that’s difficult to fake.

“Why must disclosure only come from a CNN camera?”

Corey: I’m not allowed to bring any technology with me. I’m screened for AI every time I go up. You cannot bring technology with you.

So there’s no way I can bring a camera with me and stick it in Tear-Eir’s face when he’s trying to communicate to me.

David: So you’re saying that any technology from Earth could potentially have this AI in it . . .

Corey: Uh-huh.

David: . . . just as the . . . because you also mentioned it can exist as an electromagnetic source.

Corey: Right. Right. It’s just security protocol.

David: Right. Is there also some reason, in terms of the Blue Avians and what they’re wanting to be disclosure, that they don’t want too much proof too quickly so that free will is preserved?

Corey: The way they see it, all the proof, that’s all up to us and the process. The only thing they’re concerned with is raising the vibration of humanity and raising our consciousness.

The way they see it, if they raise our consciousness, everything else will just fall into place.

David: Sure. Just because this is something that’s come up a lot in the discussion forum, people have often said, “Why can’t he put some kind of camera in his living room so that if a sphere shows up, he can catch it on film as it’s happening, and then that’ll be the big event that finally proves that he’s telling the truth?”

Corey: Well, the one time that I did put a camera up in my room, the meeting did not occur that night.

David: Really?

Corey: Right.

David: What do you think is the reason for why the beings don’t want a definitive smoking gun of proof given to us at this point?

Corey: Everyone has to go through their own process, their own spiritual process in raising their vibration and going towards disclosure.

People say that, “Oh, I’m spiritually advanced. I will not worship beings if they appear.”

But that is not the history that these beings have seen with us.

We are programmed to worship something higher, and a being comes in, we’ll be, “Oh, this is an angel”, and try to apply it to whatever personal religion we have built up in our heads, and then start praying to them, which they already have a problem with.

David: Right. This is a subject we could talk about for a long time, but we are trying to get through a bunch of questions here.

We have one from Jenaceae:

“Okay, so are the Pre-Adamites then what we are calling the Annunaki or are they the step-link between the Annunaki and the elite Cabal sun god worshipers?

“All the sun god people the Cabal worship have elongated heads, right?”

Corey: Well, the Pre-Adamites are basically fallen angels. 55,000 to 60,000 years ago, they pretty much crash landed here after a series of misfortunes.

They are not allies with the Draco, by any means. They’ve had agreements with them, but they kept the Reptilians in check in the past.

And it was after this last deluge or global catastrophe that caused Antarctica to shift its place on the globe and then be covered in ice that they lost all access to their technology and were then unable to keep the Reptilians at bay as they had done in the past.

So it’s really hard. Annunaki is a term that can mean, you know, “from the heavens”, or it’s kind of a blanket term.

David: Right.

Corey: So the Reptilians are often referred to as Annunaki and so are these Pre-Adamites.

David: Okay. We have John 1111:

“Hi, Corey and David. I am a wanderer, and as a result, a friendly, nonviolent person. But I was wondering if I would incur some sort of karmic debt by wanting to destroy Reptilians? Is there anything wrong with wanting to kill the bad guys or should we just let them be?”

Corey: We have to go . . . and this is going to sound really bizarre, but we have to get to a point in our journey – and it’ll probably be well after disclosure – to where we’re going to have to forgive those beings, or it’s going to hold us back spiritually and karmically.

We’re going to actually have to forgive the beings that have been torturing and murdering and enslaving us for millennia.

David: It would appear, if you look at the history of Atlantis, that seemingly benevolent beings, these Elohim, did decide for Atlantis to be destroyed and that a lot of those lives were lost. So it would appear that maybe on a level bigger than individual human free will that nature itself sometimes does things that resolve some of these issues or dramatically reduce the population of a negative civilization.

Corey: Right. These negative beings, they’re being neutralized and taken care of right now, not only by higher density beings but by the universe itself, by the cycle that our galaxy is going through.

We still have to fight this battle against them. We have to fight for sovereignty, but after we win the battle, then we have to move to a point where we can forgive them, which is . . . I’m not at that point.

David: I also have often looked at what the Cabal is doing, where they think population on Earth is the enemy and population must be attacked.

And my response to that is, if nature sees something out of balance, nature will take care of it. It’s not necessarily our right, or our privilege, if they want to think of it in such a dark way as that, to try to do these things when nature will take care of itself. It has cycles of replenishing and cleansing.

If there is to be a problem, it’s not our job to go out there and try to do this.

Corey: Right. And sociopaths are the ones that usually rise to power in these organizations.

David: There you go. So now we have another one. This is from ARW 575:

“If we are all one, then I presume we are one with the Reptilians and all other entities. How can we evolve if we race around the galaxy battling with other entities? Are we not then just warring with ourselves? It gets confusing.”

Corey: You have mass consciousness. You have the mass consciousness of humanity, and I’ve described, when I was shown this mass consciousness being, that it was a traumatized schizophrenic basically.

David: Yeah.

Corey: There is some sort of a battle, but also a process that the Reptilians are growing and learning from these experiences just like we are. It’s a hierarchical situation.

At the very tip-top, we are all one.

David: Well, what would you say also about the idea in The Law of One where they explain that we live in the illusion, and that the illusion is staged for the benefit of the development of consciousness?

Corey: It’s all about consciousness, the development of consciousness. That’s all they care about, these higher density beings. That’s really the . . . Everyone is like, you know, what is the reason for life?What is the purpose for life?

It’s all about the continual development of consciousness, not only on an individual basis but as a mass consciousness being that we’re a part of.

David: Okay, now we have Selene 2:

“What, if anything, does CERN have to do with manipulating the Earth’s magnetic field? Anything you can offer there would be useful. Many things for your wonderful disclosures.”

Corey: From what I understand, CERN is one of these multipurpose-type technologies. There are different groups of scientists going in, trying to achieve different goals.

They’re using it as some sort of a . . . They’re trying to interact with the Earth’s magnetic field. They’re using it trying to create portals. They’re using it to also develop torsion field technologies.

It is a laboratory that has multiple purposes. It’s not just there to create a wormhole. It’s not just there to interact with the ley lines. It is a multipurpose technology.

David: I’ll just throw in here that in talking with Henry Deacon, he actually worked on CERN for a while as a job. And he said that it is so difficult to actually get the particles to hit each other that it requires people who are intuitive.

And he was one of the people who was psychic enough to be able to intuitively work the controls so that you’d actually get particle collisions.

I’m wondering if that lines up with anything you heard?

Corey: It doesn’t line up with what I’ve heard, but it makes total sense.

5 Corey And David

David: Right. Next, we have DJ Miss Mixit:

“Corey, could you please ask some of the beings from higher vibrations the best, most efficient tools for clearing the pineal gland.

“Is there a Hertz frequency I can make? Is meditation enough for me to simply imagine it being cleared?”

Corey: Meditation and diet are the way to go. You want to make sure that you can remove the calcification in your pineal gland, but also you want the pineal gland interacting with your higher self in a conducive way.

So you need to have yourself on the right vibratory level through meditation.

David: I would also just point out, one of the things Peterson said is that the halides, which would be like chlorine, fluoride, etc., pass through the blood brain barrier and attach to the little crystals in your pineal gland, and that’s one of the main things that causes calcification.

Corey: That’s true.

David: So have the beings told you to avoid tap water and things like this?

Corey: Yes, I only drink spring water at home.

David: Okay.

Corey: Right.

David: Next, we have one from Inscizor:

“My questions are about densities. What density would Jesus or the Buddha have been considered to have moved into after being here?

“How about the in-between live state before one is to reincarnate? How does that fit in with the idea of densities of consciousness?”

“Is heaven considered to be the next, say the fourth or higher, level of consciousness, or is it something entirely different?”

Corey: The way densities have been explained to me is it’s all about consciousness. It’s different vibratory states of consciousness.

And once you reach a certain vibratory state of consciousness, as we’ve stated, you can control matter with consciousness.

So you begin to change your environment as you go up the octaves consciously.

David: Okay. We have L. Mensah 732:

“Can mass consciousness toward a specific goal via the Internet be as effective as being physically together in one place?

“For instance, I guess this is Heather Sartain’s episode, she mentioned people being on one continent and how that would affect Earth’s rotation.”

So I think what they’re looking at here is could we do, like a mass meditation and reduce terrorism without everybody having to be in the same room like they were in the original transcendental meditation studies?

Corey: Yes, that definitely does work. You don’t have to be in proximity with other people. But when you get a lot of people that are . . . they have practiced disciplines to where they can meditate deeply, you get a lot of those people in proximity, there is a power to it, for sure.

David: I agree. So here’s another one from Sassafrass 7:

“Good stuff. I have so many more questions. How do the Reptilians reproduce? Do they have a gestation period and then are born similar to mammals on Earth?

“But if they are fourth-dimensional beings, do they need to be born at all or do they just create their bodies with thought? I understand they do eat. Unfortunately, they enjoy eating people.

“I thought a fourth-dimensional being would not need to eat. Does this mean they are doing this only for sport or something like that?”

Corey: Yeah, well, this all goes back to our different belief systems on what dimensions, densities are. A lot of people think that a fourth-density being could be standing right next to us, and we wouldn’t see them. We’d be passing through each other. You know, we couldn’t hold hands with them.

That’s not at all the case. It’s just they have a different consciousness vibration.

What I’d normally say is, what do you consider a dog or a bacteria? You know, second, first-density life, you can interact with them, no problem.

David: Right. Sure. As far as the Reptilian breeding cycle and birthing cycle, is there a sexual reproduction that leads to a pregnancy and a birth?

Corey: Exactly. Yes. And they also use cloning.

David: Okay. Lastly, we have 23 Window:

“I wanted to put something forward. The name ‘wanderers’ and ‘starseeds’ alone come with a positive connotation, but now, I’m hearing that the Cabal or MILABs identify these kids early along, take them, and fractionalize their brains into doing work for the Cabal.

“Weren’t these people sent here in the first place to do good for humanity? Yet, the Draco has infiltrated the Cabal and figured out how to brainwash them and control them for their own purposes.”

Corey: Yeah, they basically hijacked their mission. That’s the whole point. They hijack their mission. They come here with certain abilities, and then they exploit those abilities.

And in doing so, they’re co-opting the enemy the way they see it. They’re causing . . . These starseed beings are coming here to effect positive change on the planet.

The Reptilians, for instance, do not want positive change on the planet, so they’re corrupting these “soldiers” to fight for them.

David: Well, this obviously is not an airtight system in which all people who are wanderers are being completely compromised.

So could you speak to that a little bit, in terms of how would someone navigate this successfully if they are an ET soul and still be able to do what they’re supposed to be doing on the planet?

Corey: Well, stay away from any government organization that tells you you’re special. Ha. That’s number one.

And practice humility, concentrate on your own personal journey, and meditating on what your mission is. And once you’ve been awakened to your mission, go for it.

If you do that, then you’re going to effect positive change and combat the groups that are co-opting the starseeds.

David: That’s all the time we have for in this episode. I’m your host, David Wilcock here with Corey Goode. This is “Cosmic Disclosure” on Gaia. And we thank you for watching.

COSMIC DISCLOSURE: TRACING THE ROOTS OF THE SSP WITH MICHAEL SALLA

Source: Sphere Being Alliance

David Wilcock: All right, welcome to “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m your host,David Wilcock. I’m here with Corey Goode and our special guest Dr. Michael Salla from Exopolitics Institute.

So Michael, welcome to the show.

Dr. Michael Salla: Thanks for having me on the show, David.

David: Thanks. And Corey, good to have you back, buddy.

Corey Goode: Thank you.

David: I was talking with you about another book that you wrote, “Kennedy’s Last Stand”, and so I’d like to open with that for this episode.

Michael: Well, the book really goes into what Kennedy knew about this whole topic. And the thing that . . .

1 Kennedy S Last Stand

David: What whole topic?

Michael: The topic of UFOs, flying saucers.

David: Oh.

 Michael Salla

Michael: Kennedy was very interested in that, and so the book looks at his history of trying to find out about it. But one of the things that I did in that book was, I was able to find out that, early in his career, Kennedy was actually a protege of James Forrestal, who at the time was the Secretary of the Navy.

Corey: The Navy, yeah.

Michael: And so Forrestal took Kennedy . . . This was before Kennedy became a congressman or even entered politics. And Forrestal, at the time, wanted to recruit Kennedy to his personal staff.

So Forrestal took Kennedy on a fact-finding trip to Germany in July and August of 1945. So this is after the war.

You had the Navy there, the Army there, basically pouring over everything that the Nazis were developing in terms of secret technologies and trying to find out what it was that they were going to bring back under Operation Paperclip – scientists and technologies.

So Forrestal . . .

David: So even though they fled to Antarctica, it wasn’t like they got everything out.

Michael: Exactly, yeah. The Germans still had a lot of really advanced stuff down there. Certainly, as far as the Air Force and the Navy were concerned, the stuff that the Germans were working on in occupied Europe was just way ahead of anything they had.

So the Navy was there trying to work out what it was that they should ship back to the U.S. to work on in their top secret laboratories.

David: Let me ask you this. Did the U.S. have captured German soldiers and scientists who were telling them what was there? Or were they just going into an abandoned building and then trying to poke around and look for things?

Michael: Oh, they had both. They had a lot of scientists, engineers, that were trying to cut a deal, trying to get a favorable place to live, or maybe even get repatriated to whatever country they were originally from, or even to the U.S., . . .

David: Right.

Michael: . . . people that had documents that wanted to cut a deal. People knew where the secret laboratories were.

So you had all of this happening, and so the Navy and the Army had their top intelligence teams in there trying to sift out exactly what was available.

David: All right. Sorry to interrupt, but I think this is really important, too.

In case people are younger, they don’t understand this, Kennedy is not just an ordinary family. We have a background on the Kennedys in which Joseph Kennedy, the father of all the Kennedy brothers, was well-known as a bootlegger, and had made a significant fortune.

Michael: Well, yeah. He was a very successful businessman. I mean, he did a number of things, and bootlegging during prohibition was one of the things.

David: Right.

Michael: But he’s probably best known for being the ambassador for the U.S. to England just before the Second World War.

David: Okay.

Michael: And he was also, along with James Forrestal, the . . . he became the first, I think, it’s the President of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

David: Oh, really?

Michael: So this was . . . So he was really at the apex of the financial system in the U.S. at the time.

David: Right, because the SEC is what’s regulating the whole stocks and commodities markets, and all that.

Corey: Yeah. And the tie-in to Forrestal is obvious. Forrestal pops up in ufology everywhere.

David: MJ-12, right?

Michael: Right, yeah. He was on the MJ-12 committee. And Forrestal, he was the guy that worked for a major financial company Dillon and Read. And so he was picked by the Navy, by Roosevelt, to actually help the Navy prepare for the war, because he had the expertise, the knowledge of major scale industrial manufacturing, and the Navy needed to really change in order to deal with the pressure of fighting two wars.

Corey: There are some interesting tie-ins between Forrestal and William Tompkins, are there not?

Michael: Very important. According to William Tompkins, Forrestal was the guy that picked the admiral that would run the top secret Navy program that was going to be trying to get as much information as they could on what the Nazis were doing, in terms of secret space technologies.

And Forrestal was also the guy that somehow was influenced by Nordics to pick Rico Botta to actually play this role.

So Forrestal was in communication with these Nordic extraterrestrials. And that’s a part of what I discuss in the new book, “The U.S. Navy’s Secret Space Program”, the way in which Nordics extraterrestrials were helping the U.S. Navy, right across the spectrum in terms of – from the very beginning to the very end – in the Navy’s developing a secret space program.

David: Do you think that at the time that Forrestal is bringing Kennedy over to this very recently defeated Germany, to get into all the good stuff, do you think they already had a plan with Joe Kennedy that his sons were going to run for president?

Michael: Well, that may have been a factor in why John F. Kennedy didn’t accept Forrestal’s offer . . .

David: Oh, he didn’t?

Michael: . . . to join his personal staff, because Forrestal wanted to recruit Kennedy to his personal staff, and because Jack Kennedy died and – you know, his brother, his older brother died – the father, Joe Kennedy, wanted John F. Kennedy to now enter politics.

David: Oh.

Michael: And so that was why Kennedy turned down Forrestal’s offer to be a part of his personal staff, and Kennedy then entered politics instead and became a congressman – elected to Congress in 1946.

David: Well, do you see, in your research in “Kennedy’s Last Stand”, any other evidence that Kennedy was actually given briefings or was made aware of some of what was going on with the extraterrestrial question?

Michael: Well, not so much as far as the extraterrestrial question is concerned, but as far as Nazi Germany’s advanced programs, he was given access to all of it. I mean, he knew what . . .

David: Really?

Michael: . . . was going on, that Forrestal actually was showing Kennedy all of these advanced technologies and Kennedy wrote about it in a book that was published posthumously, called “Prelude to Leadership”.

3 Prelude To Leadership

Not many people know about this book . . .

David: Never head of it.

Michael: . . . but it’s a book, written by John F. Kennedy, about his time in occupied Europe, and in Germany, in particular. But the important thing to keep in mind here is that at that same time as Forrestal was showing Kennedy all of these captured German technologies, that Forrestal was the guy that was ultimately in charge of the Navy’s secret espionage program in Nazi Germany, where they were getting all of this intel about Germany having two secret space programs.

And so Forrestal was looking, on behalf of the Navy, for anything that he could find about Germany’s secret space programs.

And so that meant that Kennedy knew about all of this, as well.

David: Right.

Michael: And so this is an important historical fact that that book really articulates, that because of Kennedy’s exposure to this whole phenomenon of advanced UFOs, flying saucers, extraterrestrial life – the kind of information Forrestal was sharing with him – because of that, when Kennedy became president in January 1961, that Kennedy really made an effort to get to the bottom of this whole phenomenon and really get power back, in terms of the president running these secret projects, rather than the projects becoming autonomous, as happened under Eisenhower.

David: All right. I want to ask you one more question about Eisenhower, and then I want to toss it back to Corey for a clarification.

4 Corey Michael And David

We know that Eisenhower ordered this invasion of Area 51, as we talked about in our last episode. And in his infamous closing remarks as he leaves office, he warns about the acquisition of unwarranted influence, either sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex, and then he hands it over to Kennedy.

5 Eisenhower Statement

Have you researched whether there was a conversation between Eisenhower and Kennedy about what Eisenhower had experienced in that transition of power?

Michael: Well, we know from official records that Kennedy met with President Eisenhower twice while Kennedy was President-elect, that they met in December and in January.

And the January event was just a couple of days, two or three days, before the farewell address. So I think it’s fair to assume that whatever Eisenhower shared publicly is much, much less than what he shared privately with Kennedy.

David: Now, you’ve undoubtedly done research on this idea that some kind of benevolent extraterrestrial group met with Eisenhower.

So for those who are not familiar with that, could you just talk a little bit about your knowledge of the Ike and ETs event?

Michael: Sure. Well, I think that there’s so many different whistleblowers who’ve come forward and witnesses, that we can kind of get an idea of the chronology of these different meetings that Eisenhower was a part of.

That starting in February of 1954, that Eisenhower traveled to Edwards Air Force Base, and he met with a positive group of extraterrestrials – what Bill Tompkins describes as Nordic extraterrestrials – and they kind of really emphasized to him the dangers of developing nuclear weapons – thermal nuclear weapons at that time were being deployed; these were hydrogen bombs – and that the Eisenhower administration should follow a more peaceful policy and be open to receiving more spiritual, more ethical information.

Eisenhower, I think, personally, was very impressed by the Nordics, but his national security team said, “No, we’re not going to give up nuclear weapons, and we’re not going to listen to this kind of spiritual, ethical upliftment talk at all.”

So then Eisenhower met with another group of extraterrestrials in February of 1955, this time at Holloman Air Force Base, and this was a group of Grey extraterrestrials, tall Greys, that basically reached agreements with Eisenhower in terms of sharing their technologies.

The Greys weren’t too perturbed that the U.S. was developing thermal nuclear weapons, and so that’s where the agreements began with the Greys.

David: The alleged Tau IX Treaty that led to the formalizing of abductions and all that.

Michael: Right, exactly. And this, of course, all happened after the flyovers in 1952, the Washington flyovers, where you had those craft flying over.

6 1952 UFO Washington DC Flyover

And, of course, the big debate is, were they extraterrestrial or were they Nazi? And, of course, we’ve had different stories on that, but what Bill Tompkins and what Corey have said, as well as Clark McClelland, is that these were Nazi craft.

And so that suggests that the subsequent meetings that happened, these were . . . The agreement that happened after the Holloman Air Force Base was with a group that was allied with the Nazis.

And interestingly, one of the witnesses that was at Holloman Air Force Base in 1955, he actually referred to that Nazi element.

David: All right. So Corey, what was your personal knowledge of extraterrestrial contacts with presidents? When did that first start? Did anything happen with Truman? Did anything happen with Eisenhower, in terms of what you were told, yourself, on the inside?

Corey: There were meetings with Truman and Eisenhower. Eisenhower was meeting with groups that he mentioned, non-terrestrial groups, as well as one called the Blues.

He had a number of meetings where Nazis flew in in these flying saucers, landed it on bases, and came out and had meetings with, I mean, actual Nazis, as well.

David: And we’ve briefly touched on the Blues before, but this is a fascinating area for me because I was able to independently confirm what you said with Pete Peterson.

So could you describe for us, why were they called the Blues? What did they say and how was it taken?

Corey: They were called the Blues because they had blue skin, and their agenda was peaceful.

Much like the Nordics, they were advising us not to dabble in nuclear energy or weaponry. They also were giving us spiritually uplifting information, information about consciousness, stuff that the military really had no use for.

And much later on, they were referred to, and the Nordics, they refer to them, jokingly, as ‘space hippies’. Although there were no hippies in the 1940s, later on they were called that.

David: What was the deal that the Blues were offering? What would we have to do to get their cooperation?

Corey: Give up nuclear weapons. Give up the pursuit of nuclear weapons.

David: But what would be the payoff for us if we did? What were they offering as the carrot?

Corey: To begin to help us spiritually, to integrate with other civilizations.

David: Now, you had mentioned very briefly Clark McClelland, and that’s just popped up on the radar screen recently in a new insider correlation with Tompkins.

And I’m sure you’re familiar with that, so could you share with us how McClelland has suddenly popped into the story?

7 Clark McClelland

Michael: Well, with Clark McClelland, he was a spacecraft operator for NASA at the end of his career. Prior to that, he worked for about three decades for various NASA contractors.

So he had a bird’s-eye view of what was happening at NASA, and so he was able to confirm what Bill Tompkins had to say, that NASA had been infiltrated by Nazis.

Clark McClelland, for example, said that when he went to the office of Kurt Debus, who was the first Director of the Kennedy Space Center, that McClelland met Hans Kammler.

8 Kurt Debus

9 Hans Kammler

And Kammler was the Nazi SS General that ran their Secret Space Program in occupied Europe, trying to weaponize the technologies – the Die Glocke or the Nazi Bell – that Kammler was in charge of all of this.

So here you have Kammler, in the 1960s, at the Kennedy Space Center meeting with the director.

And so McClelland was able to confirm that that was actually happening, and so that was confirmation, or really strong corroboration, for what Bill Tompkins was saying about the way in which the Nazis continued to have this undue influence over the entire NASA space program, and had actually infiltrated the military-industrial complex.

And that’s one of the things that Tompkins says, that the military-industrial complex – various companies and various military organizations – found themselves almost in a kind of proxy war between these different extraterrestrial factions: the Nazi Reptilian group that were trying to infiltrate and take over the U.S. military-industrial complex, and then another group, the Nordic extraterrestrials, who identified the Navy as really being the one U.S. institution that was kind of much more aligned, or supportive, of U.S. constitutional values.

David: For those who are watching this show who are not familiar with Clark McClelland, I know what his background is, but I’d like for you to share in your words.

What was the big sizzle – his testimony about the Space Shuttle going back years ago – that we’ve all encountered?

Michael: Well, what he did was, he actually said that he saw on the NASA live feed, an incident involving the Space Shuttle, where there was another craft parked near the Space Shuttle – another spacecraft – and there was at least two different types of astronauts accompanying the NASA astronauts, or the Space Shuttle astronauts, who were out there doing a space walk.

He compared the size of these astronauts from this foreign spacecraft. They were around 10-foot tall compared to the NASA astronauts.

So he had a diagram illustrating what he had seen, and so he spoke at length about this as being evidence that there was a Secret Space Program program with alien astronauts that were somehow collaborating with the NASA space program.

David: So one of the things that you’ve gotten into, in some of your more recent work, is this idea of how the fictional tales that are told in movies, and comic books, and now video games, of course, regular books by science fiction authors, like Arthur C. Clarke, Isaac Asimov, how were they being influenced by what was going on from the things you’ve learned firsthand talking to Tompkins and other insiders?

Michael: Well, one of the people that Bill Tompkins identified as being a key player in the Navy’s development of a secret space program was Admiral Leslie Stevens.

10 Admiral Leslie Clark Stevens

Now, Admiral Stevens, he was actually a contemporary of Admiral Botta, who was running the Navy program out of San Diego, learning all about the Nazi space program.

And what I’ve been able to determine is that, through Freedom of Information Act [FOIA], that Stevens and Botta actually served together on at least one committee.

So this was something that really supported what Bill Tompkins was saying, that Stevens was involved in this and was very familiar with the Navy’s Secret Space Program.

Well, the important thing about Admiral Stevens is that he had a son who had the same name, Leslie Stevens, so Leslie Stevens IV. He was the producer of the famous show, “The Outer Limits”.

11 Leslie Stevens IV

12 The Outer Limits

And at that time, around 1964, ’65, Gene Roddenberry sat in on the set of “The Outer Limits”, to kind of learn from Leslie Stevens how to put together a science fiction show.

13 Gene Roddenberry

David: Wow! Let me interrupt you just really briefly because this is amazing. So I’m sitting with one of my insiders, who we call Daniel, and he’s the guy that allegedly worked at Montauk, where they back-engineered a seat from a UFO, got it working, and you could sit in the chair, meditate and create a portal that could actually send people through space and time.

And one day he was talking about what happens when you use some of these technologies, and it creates a little orb that can look where you want to have it look.

And he said that the name of this thing was an “outer band individuated teletracer” or OBIT.

And we go online, and I just said, “Hey man, let’s just look this up right now, and see if . . . has anybody ever leaked this information?”

“The Outer Limits” . . .

Michael: Exactly.

David: . . . had an episode called “Outer Band Individuated Teletracer” – exactly the same. And then, the actual description of it was that it was a device that could do all surveillance in all places at all times.

So that showed me right away, okay, “The Outer Limits” has got to have some kind of insider connection.

Michael: And one of the things about Leslie Stevens’ father, the Admiral, he actually ran the psychological warfare operations for the National Security Council.

David: Wow!

Michael: So he was in charge of that. And Leslie Stevens IV, the producer of “The Outer Limits”, his background was military intelligence. So he actually served for military intelligence, and because of his expertise, I believe that what he did during the Second World War was psychological warfare operations.

So then what I’ve been able to deduce from my research – and it’s in the new book – is that Leslie Stevens IV was basically working with his father, up until his father’s death, in psychological warfare operations, in trying to introduce some of these breakthrough ideas as a form of soft disclosure in the media and entertainment industry.

So when we have “The Outer Limits” being created, you have Gene Roddenberry sitting in on it after the failure of a series that he had earlier put together, which was called “The Lieutenant”.

14 The Lieutenant

So it was all about a Navy lieutenant. So that flopped. It only lasted, I think, one year, possibly two years.

And so Roddenberry was advised by his agent to come up with a science fiction show.

So he sat in on “The Outer Limits”, and according to people that were there, Roddenberry and Stevens had reached an information agreement, in terms of Roddenberry would get all the information from Stevens about developing his science fiction series, and he would get all the credit – that he wouldn’t mention Stevens.

David: Wow!

Michael: And that’s exactly what happened. And so then we have, of course, the creation of “Star Trek”.

And if you look at “Star Trek”, some of the main forces, there’s an uncanny parallel with the main groups that Bill Tompkins was talking about.

So in “Star Trek” you have the Confederation of Planets. You have the Vulcans. The Vulcans, we can compare them to say the Nordic extraterrestrials, trying to help humanity.

You also have the Klingons, who would be represented by the Reptilians today.

David: Wow! Okay.

Michael: And then you have the genetically enhanced humans, which were the Nazis.

So if you look at the development of “Star Trek” as a series, the main protagonist in that series, there’s an uncanny resemblance to the major extraterrestrial groups and factions, Earth factions, that were involved in these secret space programs right throughout the 1940s, ’50s and ’60s.

David: So another show that really pops up in my mind, Michael, is “Battlestar Galactica”.

15 Battleship Galactica

Did your research turn up anything about “Battlestar Gallactica”?

Michael: Well, what was really significant about “Battlestar Gallactica” was that the creator of “Battlestar Galactica” was Glen Larson.

 Larson

And Glen Larson actually worked under Leslie Stevens.

David: Oh, really?

Michael: He worked with him. They shared a lot of talent. Leslie Stevens was the senior, and so Larson had reached a similar kind of agreement with Leslie Stevens where Stevens would come up with ideas and help Larson in developing a science fiction show.

And what’s interesting – and this we’ve learned from people who have later on interviewed key people that were involved in the creation of “Battlestar Galactica” – was that the pilot episode of “Battlestar Galactica” was actually written by Leslie Stevens IV.

David: Really?

Michael: So you actually have the son of a Navy Admiral that was involved in the Navy’s Secret Space Program, writing the pilot episode for a new sci-fi series that he would not get any credit for, but would actually go under the control and be all credited to Glenn Larson.

David: Wow!

Michael: And so, again, this kind of shows that the Navy, through Leslie Stevens, was wanting to have these ideas, the truth of a Navy Secret Space Program and different forms of extraterrestrial life, including artificial intelligence, because that’s what “Battlestar Galactica” really focuses on, is the danger of artificial intelligence.

And so Glen Larson, in that series, just developed the whole idea of extraterrestrials that are having to deal with this conflict with different AI life forms who are intent on eradicating the human creators of that life form throughout the galaxy.

And this is something that kind of dovetails with what Corey has revealed. I remember Corey talking to great length about the danger posed by artificial intelligence, and how AI was screened by the different secret space programs because of the threat.

So this, again, is just confirmation that this was very real material that was being seeded into the public domain through these movies.

David: Do you think . . .

Corey: The truth is definitely stranger than fiction.

David: Do you think that this Leslie Stevens connection is why you hear Naval whistles when people walk into the room on “Star Trek”?

Michael: Oh, definitely. Yeah, I mean, you look at “Star Trek” itself, I mean, it’s all based on this, kind of like, . . . they use Navy procedures and the rankings are Navy.

David: Right.

Michael: The Star Fleet – they talk about Star Fleet Command and all of that. So, yeah, they use a lot of Navy terminology in “Star Trek”, and I believe that’s because the Navy was getting Stevens to leak this stuff out into the public arena through soft disclosure.

Because I think what the Navy really thought, through the 1960s, that eventually, by the time that they had finished building their battle groups that were deployed in the early 1980s, that disclosure would have happened by then.

David: Oh.

Michael: So I think that “Star Trek” was part of an effort by the Navy to kind of seed these ideas into the public consciousness, so that at some time in the future, when the truth was revealed that the Navy had the know-how to build these space battle groups, that the public would come on board and support it, and so the Navy could continue to develop this and expand it.

David: So Michael, I have some documents here that show some really amazing work that you’ve done in terms of taking the Tompkins’ story that we’ve all been dealing with now, and bringing it into this Freedom of Information Act academic research arena that ufology is known for.

So the first one that you have here . . . it’s from U.S. Naval Air Station San Diego signed by Rico Botta.

17 12 24 1943 Doc

18 Rico Botta S Signature

So what’s going on here with this particular document?

Michael: Well, with this document, this was something that William Tompkins put into his book, “Selected by Extraterrestrials”, and basically these were exit slips that he could use to be able to leave Naval Air Station San Diego with documents, with briefing packets, which is a key part of his story.

David: Right.

Michael: But in terms of verifying, well, is this real? Are these exit passes real? Do they have information on them that can be independently corroborated?

So that’s what I tried to do, and I used the FOIA Information Act documents that I received to corroborate that these exit passes were actually signed by a person who actually was in charge of Naval Air Station San Diego at the time that Tompkins said that he received the permission to take these packages out. And then that, of course, concerns Rico Botta.

19 Tompkins Exit Pass 1

20 Tompkins Exit Pass 2

David: It says here that it was for “issue of non-combat airplane.” Ha, ha.

21 Tompkins Exit Pass 3

Michael: Well, that’s right.

David: So what the heck is that?

Michael: Yeah, well, what that document shows is that Tompkins not only was given permission to take these briefing packets out of Naval Air Station San Diego, but he was also given permission to use a plane – to take an actual non-combat plane that was owned by the Admiral – to deliver these packages.

So this is corroborating a key part of Tompkins’ story that he took these different briefing packets to various aerospace companies throughout the U.S., especially the west coast of the U.S. at the time, the different military departments and so forth.

So it’s really . . . Corroborating this document helps determine some key elements of his testimony.

 Rico Botta

David: Okay, now here we have a photograph of Rico Botta, Lieutenant Commander of the U.S. Navy, August 27, 1934, and then his signature.

23 Comparison Of Signatures

And what’s so interesting about this, Michael, is that in this next document you showed us, you have compared that signature on that photograph to the signature that was on the release for the packages, and they’re basically identical. I mean, it’s the same signature.

So how did you get this picture of Rico Botta? Where did that come from? Let’s talk about that first.

Michael: Well, that picture of Rico Botta, that came from his Freedom of Information Act files, the 1,500 pages of documents that I received.

David: So you filed for them, and you actually got them in the mail?

Michael: I filed with the aid of an attorney.

David: Okay.

Michael: His name is Duke Brookhouse and he has been helping with these FOIA requests.

And so, when we got the documents, I went through them and identified the ones that helped corroborate key elements of Tompkins’ story.

So this particular document, with his signature and his photo – even though it’s dated from the early 1930s – clearly shows that the signature is identical with what was on those exit passes that Tompkins gave.

So that is independent corroboration that Tompkins’ document is genuine. And that’s very important that you actually . . . Tompkins’ exit passes . . . those two exit passes showing that he had permission to take these briefing packets out of San Diego Naval Air Station, that that’s a genuine document.

So that’s a very important part of corroborating his story that he was able to take these to different facilities, and that he was given permission to actually use an airplane to fly these to the different locations.

24 Navy Dept 1942 Doc

David: Okay. Now, the next one here, it says Navy Department, Bureau of Navigation, Washington, D.C., dated September 30, 1942, from the Chief of Naval Personnel to Captain Rico Botta.

And the thing that really jumps out at me here, it says, “Proceed to the place (or places – in the order given) indicated below, for temporary duty.”

25 Navy Dept 1942 Doc 2

And then you look down here, it says that this is “in connection with inspecting experimental aircraft and for conferences in connection with [David clears his throat to emphasize this part] aircraft matters:”

Then you get this list of “U.S. Army Air Force Experimental Station, Muroc, which we’ve all heard about the Muroc base, Douglas Aircraft, Northrop, Naval Air Station, San Diego, Consolidated Aircraft Corporation, San Diego.”

This is crazy. What is he talking about with “experimental aircraft and conferences in connection with aircraft matters?”

Michael: Well, this is, again, another document that independently corroborates various aspects of Tompkins’ testimony, that Tompkins says that he was taking these briefing packets to those facilities, as well as many others.

So this document confirms that Botta, prior to this operation that Botta oversaw in Naval Air San Diego, Botta had traveled to some of these same facilities, and that these facilities were conducting experimental aircraft research. And that Botta was the Navy’s guy when it came to understanding experimental aircraft research, and that Botta was being prepped for this new assignment, because visiting those facilities happened less than two months before he was transferred over to Naval Air Station San Diego.

So he was being prepped for that new assignment coming up, where he would be receiving intelligence from Navy spies in Germany about the Germans’ secret space programs. And that once he received the intelligence from the Navy spies, that he would then instruct Tompkins to carry briefing packets to those facilities that you just mentioned, as well as many others that Tompkins said.

So, you know, again, this is another important document that independently verifies that Bill Tompkins’ story is credible. And, of course, . . .

David: How did we get this document?

Michael: That came through the Freedom of Information Act.

26 Navy Dept 1942 Doc 3

David: Okay, so another document we have here is dated February 25, 1942, which, for the real UFO freaks, you’re going to know that, because that is immediately after the infamous Battle of Los Angeles.

And what we’re having here is Navy Department, Bureau of Aeronautics, from Washington, and it is orders for Rico Botta to have additional temporary duty. And it says for him to proceed, on about March 2, 1942, to Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio, i.e. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

27 Navy Dept 1942 3b

Michael: Exactly.

David: Holy crap! This is amazing!

Corey: Smoking document!

David: Ha, ha. I just want to throw it across the room, it’s so crazy. It’s like, wow! So talk . . . I know what I’m seeing here, but talk us through, in case people aren’t as excited as I am right now, as to why this is so significant.

Michael: Well, February 24 and 25, 1942, is when you had the famous L.A. Air Raid incident. And according to documents that have been released, The Majestic Documents, and according to what Bill Tompkins has said, there were two flying saucers that were retrieved after that crash – one by the Navy, one by the Army Air Force.

David: So some of them did get shot down.

Michael: That’s what we’re told by The Majestic Documents and what Bill Tompkins said.

Now, the one that the Army Air Force got their hands on was taken to Wright Field, which was, at the time, the Army Air Force’s premier research facility for foreign aviation technologies.

David: “Foreign.” Yeah, ha, ha.

Michael: So this was taken, . . . or this craft was retrieved, on February 25, and it was being taken to Wright Field at that time.

Now, on this very same day, Admiral Botta, who is the head of the Navy’s Powerplant Division at the Bureau of Aeronautics, gets orders to travel to Wright Field in early March, to basically do some work over there.

David: Right.

Michael: And the timing . . .

28 Navy Dept 1942 Doc 3c

David: It says, “In connection with engine development.” on the same document. What kinds of engines are they trying to develop here?

Michael: Right, so . . .

David: Probably anti-gravity. So, yeah.

Michael: So that’s a smoking gun document . . .

David: That’s incredible.

Michael: . . . that really shows that Botta was the guy that the Navy had tapped as their expert in understanding these foreign technologies – anything to do with extraterrestrial craft or Nazi craft – that Botta was the man.

And so he was nominated to go to Wright Field to really look over what it was that the Army Air Force had gotten their hands on from the L.A. Raid.

Corey: And did you say that, in an earlier conversation we had, that Rico Botta was an engineer?

Michael: That’s correct. Yes, he was an engineer. He was an expert on engine development, on power plants.

Corey: Power plants.

Michael: He was, actually at the time, the Chief of the Power Plant Division for the Bureau of Aeronautics. So he was the guy that really understood what it was that needed to be done in terms of developing high-capacity engines for high-performance aviation maneuvers.

And so if you’re talking about craft that were capable of spaceflight, he was the guy that would be able to give you insights into that.

29 Navy Doc 4

David: Right, and you have this document right here from March 15, 1946, where it says that, “his outstanding technical knowledge and skill, Rear Admiral Botta enabled his department , , , “ blah, blah, blah “. . . for combat aircraft . . . with the latest combat-improved changes . . .”

30 Navy Doc 4b

So it’s clearly . . . You have documents here saying that he’s involved in upgrading the quality of technology of combat aircraft engines and energy technologies.

Michael: Right. Exactly. That was his duty while he was working at Naval Air Station San Diego from 1942 to 1946, that he was the assembly and repair officer.

And so his job was to basically upgrade the performance of all the Navy jet fighter craft.

And in addition to that, he was also learning about what it was that the Nazis were doing in developing jet engines and also trying to weaponize flying saucers, because you had to consider that the Navy had to be prepared that the Nazis were going to succeed in developing weaponized flying saucers.

So the Navy was looking to Botta to provide the expertise and the leadership for how to deal with that contingency. But it didn’t happen, fortunately, but Botta was the guy that the Navy had tapped to lead that effort.

David: You also have actually interviewed people associated with Rico Botta, and so could you tell us a little about that and what, in just a few minutes, is the most interesting takeaway of your research, up until now, in that department?

Michael: Well, I’ve been able to have conversations with the grandson of Rico Botta, who was able to confirm some really interesting things about Botta’s contacts with the leaders of the aviation industry at the time, that he was personal friends with Jack Northrup and William Boeing, that Botta was also someone that continued to meet with senior Navy officials.

31 Mark Hill

One official that was named was Admiral Mark Hill, who was Botta’s military aide while Botta was the head of the Navy’s Armaments Section at Philadelphia Naval Shipyards, that Mark Hill was helping Botta there as his military aide, and that after Botta retired, that Mark Hill, as an active officer and he became a Rear Admiral himself, continued to visit with Botta and have conversations.

And so, to me, that’s pretty strong evidence that Botta’s insights and knowledge about these very advanced technologies was something that was being shared, even up until the time of his retirement and subsequent death, with very senior Navy officials.

David: What do you think is going to happen with this forensic reconstruction of history in time? Will we be able to eventually get new insiders, and new whistleblowers, and really get a reconstructed view of 20th century history? Do you think that will happen?

Michael: Oh, definitely. Yeah. I think that’s what’s happening now, is we’re starting to get the chronology of how the Navy developed its Secret Space Program, involving these enormous space battle groups, and that as these names are identified, and we start to track down relatives or others that worked with them, we’re probably going to find others that are willing to talk about what it was that they experienced.

So we’re trying to do that now, and I’m hoping that in this investigation of Admiral Mark Hill and Admiral Botta and his relatives, that we’re going to have more names popping up.

David: Corey, do you have any last thoughts before we close the episode?

Corey: It’s been amazing to me, the entire process of Tompkins coming out. He’s literally providing the information, or a lot of the information, I observed in the glass pad. And to see someone come out that was giving that intel, or delivering that intel, it’s a very strange synchronicity.

And the fact that he had no idea I was coming forward – all of it seems orchestrated.

David: And we’re now getting this actual nuts and bolts documentation – connecting dots, interviewing survivors – to actually show forensic reconstruction of the whole history of what led up to you eventually being in something that most people think is just completely outrageous and beyond belief.

Corey: Absolutely. And Dr. Salla’s latest research is just bolstering it more and more.

David: Well, I want to thank you, Michael, for coming in. I think these are really groundbreaking episodes that will be of extreme historical importance as we get into Full Disclosure.

And I want to honor you for your contributions in really bringing the academic spectrum in on this whole question of our “Cosmic Disclosure” show.

Michael: Thank you, David. It’s been a pleasure. And thanks, Corey.

Corey: Thank you.

David: Thank you. And I want to thank you out there for watching. You are a very important part of “Cosmic Disclosure”. With your support, telling your friends about it, we are lifting the laughter curtain. We are bringing real academic interest into something that was so far outside the norm of what UFO researchers used to talk about, and yet, as you’re seeing, it all adds up beautifully.

This is “Cosmic Disclosure”. I’m your host, David Wilcock, here with Corey Goode, and our special guest, from Exopolitics Institute, Dr. Michael Salla. Thank you for watching.