Bombshell document confirms Navy Admiral was denied access to UFO crash retrieval program

Source: Exopolitics 

The transcript of a conversation between a US Navy Vice Admiral and a leading scientist discussing a failed attempt to gain access to a highly classified program involving a crashed extraterrestrial craft has been recently released online. The conversation took place on October 16, 2002, and involved the retired Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson, speaking with Dr. Eric W. Davis, a scientist working on the feasibility of exotic propulsion systems with EarthTech International, an advanced technology think tank established in Austin, Texas.

In the 15 page document comprising the transcript, summary notes and an accompanying letter, Davis describes what Wilson told him about an April 10, 1997 “briefing” where he (Wilson) received information from former Apollo astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell and Dr. Steven Greer (founder of the Disclosure Project) about a classified UFO program that they had codeword information about. At the time, Wilson was a Rear Admiral (upper class); Deputy Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency; and Vice Director for Intelligence (VJ2), for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a position he held from November 1994 to September 1997.

When Wilson inquired into the program’s existence from a regulatory body created for Special Access Programs, he learned it involved a corporate Research and Development effort involving a retrieved extraterrestrial craft but was denied access by three corporate officials working for a major US aerospace contractor.

The 1997 briefing was first publicly discussed by Greer and his associate Shari Adamiak only a month after it occurred and was corroborated by Mitchell over a decade later. In a May 1997 interview with Art Bell on Coast to Coast AM Greer said:

Joint Chiefs of staff level fellow that I briefed while I was in Washington about a month ago … After he looked at all this and heard the witness, he turned to us and said: ‘Well I have no doubt this is true but I am horrified that I hadn’t known about it’…Because of his position. And very, very senior … I can’t say who it was but a very, very senior position…And then they begin to come to grips with well: ‘Who the hell does know about it, what is going on here?’ And then they become frighten[ed].

Years later, Greer released a National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) document containing code words and locations that sparked Wilson’s failed attempt to gain access to the classified UFO program. In a workshop Greer explained the NRO document’s contents and what happened when Wilson investigated it:

“It’s the National Reconnaissance Office document.  …..The reason it’s important is not so much for its content… …..  Take note of the distribution list, please. ….. …….’Blue Fire’, which is a code name, 1991, Commander’s Net, Royal Op’s, Cosmic Op’s…so, cosmic clearance…you’ve heard of this? It’s not a myth.  It’s real.  Maj Op’s, MAJI…It’s MAJIC Op’s.  It goes through a whole bunch of them…Nellis Division, all these code numbers and you get down to some really interesting things. … this secret document went to the admiral [Admiral Tom Wilson] prior to our meeting, and he actually recognized one of these entities and made an inquiry, and it was being run by a contractor.  …..  And the contractor…one of these corporate contractors…when he called them up, he said, ‘I’m Admiral Tom Wilson…at that time he was Head of Intelligence for the Joint Chiefs of Staff… I want to be read into this project.’  Guess what happened?  They said, ‘Sir, you don’t have a need to know.’  This is the guy who’s supposed to give the intelligence briefings for the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States.  He was told, ‘You don’t have a need to know’… and Admiral Wilson said, ‘Goddamn it, if I don’t have a need to know, who does?’  They said, ‘Sir, we cannot discuss this with you further’ and they hung up and blocked his line.  This all happened before the stand-up meeting I did for [him with] Edgar Mitchell…6th man to walk on the moon…myself, my military adviser, and a few other people met with the Admiral in what’s called a ‘stand-up’ briefing.  I was doing the presenting.  It was supposed to be 45 minutes.

In 2007 Mitchell began publicly confirming that the briefing had indeed taken place, corroborating what Greer had revealed a decade earlier.

A detailed chronology of articles and interviews referring to the 1997 Wilson briefing is provided by Croatian UFO researcher Giuliano Marinkovic.

The transcript of the 2002 conversation between Wilson and Davis was first discussed in radio interviews by UFO researchers Grant Cameron and Richard Dolan in December 2018. Cameron said he was given the 15 page document, which he shared with Michael W. Hall a former lawyer and Superior Court judge. Hall has given several interviews in March 2019 discussing the document’s origins and authenticity.

Cameron, Dolan, and Hall believe the document is authentic, and its consistency with what Greer and Mitchell had earlier revealed does point to this. I contacted Dr. Eric Davis to comment on the document’s authenticity, and he replied saying: “I have no comment on this.” If the document was a hoax, I see no reason why Dr. Davis would not have said so.

All this leads me to conclude that the document is an authentic transcript of what Dr. Davis and Admiral Wilson discussed back in 2002 about the April 1997 meeting and Wilson’s subsequent investigation. The transcript was very recently released online and are available for public viewing.

The transcript, summary notes, and accompanying letter provide compelling documentary support that the 1997 briefing had occurred, exactly as Greer and Mitchell had reported up to two decades earlier. Importantly, the notes substantiate one of Greer’s major claims that he was regularly briefing senior officials in the Clinton Administration about the UFO coverup – something many UFO researchers had previously dismissed or ridiculed.

The transcript provides a fascinating insight into how a US Navy admiral who was Vice Director for Intelligence (VJ2), for the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, was denied access by corporate officials to a classified UFO program, which he firmly believed fell under his field of responsibility.

Read the rest of the article here

Proof That Youtube is Censoring Videos

This is not surprising at all and it’s quote obvious that mainstream media platforms have no respect whatsoever to the common individual. They cater to corporations and other various entities. Luckily though the alternative media is continuing to grow at a exponential rate.

It’s become so obvious to the average person that the media is a bunch of liars and that corporations continue to censor information that people just don’t trust the news anymore. Which explains why their ratings continue to plummet.

No matter what change is coming to this planet in one way or another. I can guarantee you that. Ten years from now this world will not resemble the world we have today. I hope your all ready for a new reality, because when Full Disclosure occurs it will change everything! So bucket up everyone and enjoy the show; because the Cabal is on life support and their going down!

Timothy Frappier

Source: Coffee Break

Weaponizing 5G and Nanotechnology: How Do We Protect Ourselves?

Source: Health Impact News

Nano Technologies Flat Composition. Human Brain With Micro Chip

Protecting Yourself from Nanotechnology and Frequency Radiation

by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

Previously, I wrote about the weapon-like qualities of nanotechnology and terahertz frequency radiation. As was explained, these two technologies can be combined to weaken our health, create illness, and control our minds. See:

Will Nanotechnologies and the New 5G Network Become the Most Powerful Weapon System the World Has Ever Seen?

In response to that article, one of our readers asked this question: 

I had been taking this oral spray, and found it effective for mercury from amalgams, and brain fog, and removing a precancerous skin growth. However it apparently is nanotechnology. Is there such a thing as good and bad nanotech? Can anyone explain this seeming contradiction? I’ve stopped using for the moment until I have clear answers. Thank you. [18]

This is the Problem with Nanotechnology in a Nutshell

It is extremely easy to get nanotechnology into our bodies, but the human body has difficulty removing it and preventing it from accumulating. [1, 2]

Our immune systems have been weakened by the constant bombardment with chemicals such as glyphosate, which contaminates nearly all of our food including organic products. [3] These chemicals strip out essential minerals from our bodies and damage the normal bacteria in our guts. [2] The normal human microbiome in the gut is the primary home for our immune system.

When we add the stress caused by the constant exposure to a thousand different radio and microwave frequencies, our bodies are further weakened so that they cannot effectively respond to penetration by nano substances. As a result, nanotechnology which has been programmed to perform certain tasks can operate in us with relative freedom. [2] 

Even if nanotechnology is intended for good, such as when it is added to a medicine, supplement, skincare product, processed food, or when sprayed on the crops raised by farmers it is still very difficult to remove from the body. 

Nanotechnology can also be intended for harm as when it is sprayed in the atmosphere above the Earth. In this case, it is designed to secretly create physical lethargy, to inhibit mental clarity, to provide a mechanism for establishing mind control programming, to modify human DNA, and to stimulate disease formation and early death. [4]

Regardless of the intent behind nanotechnology, it is embedding itself in our bodies on a daily basis and is establishing networks within us that have the quality of a pseudo-lifeform or synthetic biology. [5, 6] It is not just inert small pieces of junk that just sit there, but it fulfills its mission to self-assemble into structures that perform functions according to those who programmed the materials. [2]

The problem is that once nanotechnology enters our bodies, our brains, our cells, and even modifies our DNA, then extraordinary steps must be taken to deprogram it and remove it.

Thus, even nanotechnology intended for good eventually becomes part of a toxic condition in our bodies, and becomes something that we need to help our bodies remove.

The Precautionary Principle is being Ignored by Government and Industry 

The US government and the industries that are developing and selling nanotechnology products do not embrace the precautionary principle.

Instead of proving that nano is safe before manufacturing it for product distribution, they are doing the opposite — manufacture and sell first and then study later – much later.

National Nanotechnology Initiative

The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) has assembled leading nanotechnology leaders from 25 US government agencies to coordinate the government’s response to the development of nanotechnology by government and industry.

In 2011 the “Environmental, Health, and Safety Research Strategy” was published by the NNI [7], which was intended to guide the safe development of nanotechnology. They didn’t do safety studies — they just developed definitions for nanotechnology and formulated risk assessment policy guidelines. [8]

The NNI is of course concerned about nano safety, because it is one of their priorities to assure the public that we should not be concerned about nanotechnology. [8] They are trusting in their definitions and guidelines to keep us all safe.

Despite the NNI mandate about public health and safety, their focus falls squarely on supporting research and development of new products. [9, 10] 

Are Government Agencies Convinced that Nanotechnology is Safe? 

This is what US government regulators say:

The National Institute of Occupational Health (NIOSH) as would be expected, is focusing their concerns on the safety of workers who handle nano materials. This is what they understand about nano:

Occupational health risks associated with manufacturing and using nanomaterials are not yet clearly understood. Minimal information is currently available on dominant exposure routes, potential exposure levels, and material toxicity of nanomaterials.

Studies suggest that some nanoparticles can move from the respiratory system to other organs. Research is continuing to understand how these unique properties may lead to specific health effects. [11]

In other words they don’t understand the risks, but are allowing workers to handle the materials anyway.

The National Organic Program (NOP), which oversees organic certification programs, makes these statements in their Nano Fact Sheet: 

The NOP does not consider nanotechnology to be intrinsically benign or harmful.

As with other substances, no engineered nanomaterial will be allowed for use in organic production and handling unless the substance has been: 1) petitioned for use; 2) reviewed and recommended by the NOSB; and 3) added to the National List through notice and comment rulemaking. [12]

In other words, they are sitting on the fence and will consider requests from industry when they are made. They are not going to draw a line in the sand and just say “not in organic food.”

The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) states:

Due to their tiny size, engineered nanomaterials (ENM) have unique properties that have the potential to advance electronics, medicines, and other fields. However, while ENM have many promising benefits, we know very little about their potential effects on human health and the environment.

Recognizing that engineered nanomaterials (ENM) are increasingly being used in everyday products, such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, sunscreens, clothing, and electronics, NIEHS has developed an interagency federal research strategy to explore this emerging field. The outcome of these efforts will allow scientists to design nanomaterials that are both innovative and safe for commercialization. [13]

In other words, they know nanotechnology is already being used in most sectors of the manufacturing economy, and they are starting to develop a plan to study health and safety issues. 

The US Geological Survey has been studying snails and other aquatic life. They stated:

USGS scientists are studying the linkages between contaminant bioavailability and toxicity, especially in aquatic organisms exposed to metals and metallo-nanomaterials through solution and diet. The intent is to improve understanding of the physiological and geochemical processes influencing bioaccumulation and toxicity.

ZnO nanoparticles damage digestion, although it was not clear whether the toxicity was due to the high Zn dose achieved with nanoparticles or to the ZnO nanoparticles themselves. Further study of exposure from nanoparticles in food would greatly benefit assessment of ecological and human health risks. [14]

In other words, it looks like some nanomaterials are a problem for snails, therefore there is reason for concern about human health. The government is studying snails, but not long term effects on humans.

The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has policies about products that use nanoscale materials. The FDA states:

Since this report published [in 2007 by the Nanotechnology Taskforce, the] FDA issued several guidance documents on topics relating to application of nanotechnology in FDA-regulated products. While guidance documents do not create or confer any rights for or on any person and do not operate to bind FDA or the public, they do represent FDA’s current thinking on a topic. 

Industry remains responsible for ensuring that its products meet all applicable legal requirements, including standards for safety — regardless of the emerging nature of a technology involved in the manufacturing of a product. [15]

In other words, regardless of what the FDA thinks about nanotechnology, it is up to private industry to assess human safety for the nano products they produce or use. It’s not the FDA’s problem or concern. 

Given the failure of the pharmaceutical industry to protect the public from vaccine harm and the failure of telecom companies to protect us from microwave radiation harm, do we have the slightest reason to believe that the manufacturers of nanotechnology will protect us from being harmed by nano?

To be fair to the US government, it has funded almost 500 studies about nanotechnology since 2010, but I haven’t seen any restrictions applied to the marketing, sales, or use of nanotechnology because of the research, even though some studies show risks to animal health. [19]

 

Safety of the Chemtrails Geoengineering Spraying Program

Beyond the industrial, agricultural, cosmetic, processed food, and medical uses for nanotechnology that US government agencies say they are studying, I must wonder about the unknown quantity of nano substances that the US government is spraying over the entire country on a daily basis through its aerial spraying programs (chemtrails), also known as geoengineering.

These spraying programs operate without public oversight. As far as anyone knows, the harmful health effects have not been studied for the sake of preventing harm though secret studies that may have been conducted by the US government to determine levels of intentional harm.

We don’t know the entire list of substances (nano and larger) that are being sprayed into the atmosphere. This is some of what is falling on us and on farm fields every day after chemtrail spraying:

Over the past decade, independent testing of chemtrails around the country has shown a dangerous, extremely poisonous brew that includes: barium, nano aluminum-coated fiberglass [known as CHAFF], radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, desiccated blood, mold spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide, and polymer fibers. Barium can be compared to the toxicity of arsenic. (4)

Barium is known to adversely affect the heart. Aluminum has a history of damaging brain function. Independent researchers and labs continue to show off-the-scale levels of these poisons. A few “anonymous” officials have acknowledged this on-going aerosol spraying. [1]

For previous articles on this topic, please see:

Artificial Clouds and Geoengineering: Public Exposed to Toxic Chemicals

Controlling Weather for Profit: Geoengineering and World Dominance

Covert Chemical Geoengineering Programs – A Real Threat to Public Health

Assessment of Nanotechnology Risks beyond Government Oversight

A research paper from Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri entitled “Chemtrails- the Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health,” and author of the book, The Uterine Crisis, comments on the problem we are facing today.

The late Dr. Perlingieri died under mysterious circumstances in 2013 [16] shortly after publishing this information. She stated:

… there are three main routes that nanoparticles can enter the human body: inhalation into the pulmonary system; absorption through the dermal system; ingestion through the gastrointestinal system. It must be highlighted that inhalation exposure is of the greatest concern with regard to the effects of particulate nanomaterials on occupational health, and special attention is being given to studying impacts on the respiratory system and the cardiovascular system. 

Dermal exposure is also of importance. However, healthy skin has a better barrier function when compared to the respiratory tract although this barrier function could be limited by skin lesions, strong mechanical strain or small nanoparticles (<5 to 10 nm). 

Due to the size effects, smaller particles may diffuse faster in air than their larger counterparts and can get further down the respiratory tract. In addition, it is hard to remove nanoparticles from the body as they are known to cross mucus membranes. 

Potential health effects include: inflammation of airway (bronchitis, asthma, emphysema); lung cancer; neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease); cardiovascular effects and heart disease; liver cancer; Crohn’s disease and colon cancer. [1]

Read Dr. Perlingieri’s full report:

Chemtrails: The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health

A Handful of Researchers Continue to Ring the Early Warning Bell about Nanotechnology

These researchers are not in government agencies, in corporation research labs, or in university research centers. They are conducting research from their personal labs.

They are rigorously working to reveal the truth about nanotechnology and to develop methods that people can use to protect themselves. These researchers are raising very serious concerns based on empirical observation and review of relevant scientific literature concerning the qualities of nanotechnology and its manufacturing processes. 

These researchers have witnessed extensive harm in the lives of men and women — not in theory, but based on personal observations of people who have suffered the harmful effects of nano poisoning.

According to independent researcher Jean Bryan Pelletier, when levels of nanotechnology become too high in a person’s body, they develop a wide range of symptoms of illness and can be considered as having been poisoned by toxic substances.

Nano substances are very small, but when the levels accumulate they can eventually reach a toxic threshold where a person can be said to be experiencing “nano poisoning.” [17]

I recently interviewed one of these researchers – Tony Pantalleresco, an herbalist from Canada, and specifically asked him to share what he and his colleagues have documented about the human health effects of nanotechnology and high frequency microwave radiation.

The interview focused on steps we can take to protect ourselves from these technologies.

Mr. Pantalleresco is part of a small group of researchers who are risking their lives by revealing the dark side of these technologies that are being used by industry and secret government programs.

Both Tony Pantalleresco and Jean Bryan Pelletier (AKA Bryan396) have been targeted for harm through the application of these technologies and have been called upon to help other targeted individuals.

They understand the risks of the technology and the dangers posed by those who are developing the dark side of the technology. [17]

Removing Nanotechnology from the Body

Many of us might want to rush out and take immediate steps to clean the nano junk out of our bodies, but there can be risks unless the process is handled properly and systematically.

The initial recommendations can be done by anyone at any time. Anyone who is concerned should start with these three steps.

  1. Reduce your new exposure to nanotechnology by making changes in the food that is eaten, the kind of water that is drunk, the types of cosmetics and skincare products that are used, and the pharmaceuticals and supplements that are taken.
  1. Build up your body’s natural defenses and detoxification pathways by taking a few select mineral supplements.
  1. Protect yourself by reducing exposure to WiFi and other frequency sources, which activate nanotechnology in the body and weaken the immune system.

The last part of the process must be done before any attempt is made to detoxify the existing load of nanotechnology. 

  1. Deprogram the existing nanotechnology that is in the body. If deprogramming is not done before detoxification, then the nanotechnology will not come out and can actually become more strongly embedded. Details about this will be explained in the next article.

Limiting New Exposure to Nanotechnology

This section focuses on how to limit new exposure to nano substances in food, water, skincare products, pharmaceuticals, and supplements.

These recommendations will be unpopular and some may even call them ridiculous until we stop and think about all the nano materials that are currently used in agriculture and the millions of tons of nano materials that have been falling over agricultural fields and even our home gardens for decades.

Key fact: It is impossible to escape from exposure to nano materials, but we can limit our exposure by the choices we make.

General Guideline regarding products with labels: Don’t consume any food or use any skincare product, pharmaceutical, or supplement that indicates that it contains nano ingredients such as nano silver, nano gold, nano titanium dioxide, nano silica, (diatomaceous earth), or other nano ingredients.

The long-term health risks are likely much greater than any short-term benefit. Remember nano is easy to put into the body, but very difficult to get out. 

Specific Guidelines Concerning Food

Our largest source of nano exposure, beyond what we inhale from the air, comes from the food we eat and the water we drink. As a result, a person who is concerned about minimizing consumption of nano materials may need to make new choices regarding food and water. 

Tony Pantalleresco begins with a blanket warning about grains. He indicated that grains can contain nano. Thus, he advises to not eat grains because there is no way to remove the nano. This includes pseudo-grains such as quinoa, millet, buckwheat, spelt, barley, oats, rice, etc.

Of course, grains are not the problem. The problem is where they have been grown and what has fallen upon them or what has been sprayed on them.

Grains grown in the United States and Canada will be contaminated with nano and glyphosate even if they are organic. Grains grown in remote areas far from the United States using organic growing methods can test free of glyphosate [3] and may not contain the high levels of nano found in the United States where there is constant chemtrail spraying.

Tony Pantalleresco stated:

Only eat root-based vegetables. Do not eat vegetables grown above ground – they are saturated to the core with nano. [2] 

Tony Pantalleresco explained to me that nano substances pass into the cells of plants and cannot be washed off. Thus, leafy greens simply must be avoided unless they are grown indoors. Even root vegetables must be peeled thickly before cooking. 

Tony Pantalleresco continued:

There are very few fruits you can eat. Citrus is one of the few that doesn’t have high levels of nano saturation. All berries are shot. There isn’t one type that is fit to consume. [2]

Tony Pantalleresco Offers this Process for Removing Nano From Fresh Berry Juice:

I asked Tony Pantalleresco: Is it safe to eat meat and eggs?

Everything is contaminated with nano no matter what you eat – organic, conventional, etc. Chicken, beef, lamb, whatever – I would say you can eat – but be sure to eat the saturated fat from these animals.

They will be contaminated but they will at least have filtered out a lot of the nano so that you are not going to get the full 100% hit as you would get if you go out and pick and eat a piece of parsley from the garden. 

Nano will get into meat, but at least with meat I can further filter it by consuming sulfur or trisodium phosphate that will bind with the nano in meat before it has a chance to establish itself. [2]

I asked Tony Pantalleresco: Are you saying that a diet consisting of animal meat, eggs, animal fat, and very small amounts of vegetables and fruit is the safest alternative diet?

I eat that kind of diet – that’s how I live. 

This is the best diet to go with now, but they already are working on eliminating meat from the system by bringing in this thing called CRISPR which is where they are manufacturing meat out of a lab. It will be completely suicidal to eat that. It will be just as bad as eating vegetables today that are grown in the field because of genetic contamination. 

CRISPR is already being utilized in the food supply. It is not registered or labelled as a GE or GMO even though it is.

There are no restrictions on it or regulation on it. They don’t even have to tell you it is there. It is already affecting many people by turning off their genetic code.

With the activation of this with frequencies with these towers and cell phones and what-not it will activate whatever programming that has been put into that food. And people are becoming more and more compromised. 

Our generation may be the last that knows what meat tastes like. [2]

Specific Guidelines Concerning Water

I asked Tony Pantalleresco: What is the safest form of water to drink?

The only two waters I tell people to drink are distilled or reverse osmosis. I don’t care about the minerals or anything else – I am looking at purity of water. These are the only two options that will reduce nano by 95% the rest don’t. Unless you have a filtering system that is on a nano or pekoe level you won’t pull out everything. The only thing better than distilled and reverse osmosis is double distilled. [2]

I asked Tony Pantalleresco: Is water from drilled wells contaminated with Nano?

The research I have done on those types of water systems showed that they will be loaded with bacteria and fungi, which cannot be filtered out with regular filtration. There will also be other contaminates such as pesticides from farmer’s fields or industrial waste, this is why I only advocate for RO or distilled water. [2]

Coming Up in the Next Article

The next article will look at foods that can fortify the body against nanotechnology and frequency radiation, mineral supplements that can be used to strengthen the body against nano, tools that can be used to minimize frequency radiation exposure, and the technology that can be used to deprogram existing nanotechnology that is in the body before trying to remove it.

About the Author

John P. Thomas is a health writer for Health Impact News. He holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Science in Public Health (M.S.P.H.) from the School of Public Health, Department of Health Administration, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

References

[1] “Chemtrails: The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health,” By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri, Wake Up World, 3/14/2013.

[2] I interviewed Canadian herbalist Tony Pantalleresco on April 26, 2019 by Skype and he confirmed this statement. He is an independent researcher who studies nanotechnology and frequency radiation from wireless technologies. 

[3] “ALERT: Certified Organic Food Grown in U.S. Found Contaminated with Glyphosate Herbicide,” Health Impact News.

[4] “Will Nanotechnologies and the New 5G Network Become the Most Powerful Weapon System the World Has Ever Seen?” John P. Thomas, Health Impact News, 4/16/2019.

[5] According to Tony Pantalleresco, the term “synthetic life form” was originated by the late Dr. Gwen Scott, ND, an independent researcher who investigated nanotechnology and Morgellons.

[6] “Gwen Scott died in March 2015 from Morgellons complications. Dr. Scott, a former TV news anchor and later a naturopath who studied widely and extensively, was one of the early professionals to recognize and treat Morgellons syndrome, which she herself had.” https://aboutthesky.com/smallstorm-blog/599-gwen-scott-nd and http://www.gwenscottnd.com/aboutdrgwenscott.html 

[7] “Environmental, Health, and Safety Issues,” NNI, Retrieved 5/2/2019.

[8] “2011 NNI EHS Research Strategy Webinar.”

[9] “NNI in the News,” NNI, Retrieved 5/2/2019.

[10] “Highlights of Recent Research on the Environmental, Health, and Safety Implications of Engineered Nanomaterials,” National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), 2014.

[11] “CDC – Nanotechnology – NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic,” Retrieved 5/2/2019.

[12] “Nanotechnology, Policy Memorandum,” Miles V. McEvoy, Deputy Administrator, National Organic Program, 3/24/2015.

[13] “Nano Environmental Health and Safety (Nano EHS),” National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Retrieved 5/3/2019.

[14] “Environmental Toxicology, Nanotechnology, USGS Microbiology Research,” U.S. Geological Survey, Retrieved 5/3/2019.

[15] “Nanotechnology Fact Sheet,” Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), dated 3/23/2018.

[16] “Leading Environmental Activist Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri Passes Away Amid Suspicions of Foul Play,” Andy Whiteley, Wake Up World, 10/17/2013.

[17] “Two Guys Who Know Some Stuff Talk Nano With Suzanne Maher Of Bye Bye Blue Sky,” November 2017.

[18] “Will Nanotechnologies and the New 5G Network Become the Most Powerful Weapon System the World Has Ever Seen?” HIN Community.

[19] “Nanotechnology Notable Papers and Advances,” Retrieved 5/15/2019.

How ‘Teen Vogue’ Indoctrinates Teens: “This Idea That the Body is Either Male or Female is Totally Wrong”

12:44pm – 5-30-19 – Update

If you agree that this type of video is uncalled for and inappropriate for children from ages 13-18 then I would email them like I did. We shouldn’t stand such gross manipulation of biological fact. If they email me back I’ll post if here on this article. Here’s my email I sent:

“Teen Vogue,

I find your 5 Misconceptions About Sex and Gender video to be gross manipulation of scientifically proven biological fact. When a child is born, you’re either a boy or girl, that is that. There is no way to determine if one child is going to be tran-sexual or not. Genetic studies have been inconclusive in regards to our genes determining sexual orientation. The fact of the matter is your biological gender cannot be disputed, but your chosen gender identity can be since you have the free-will choice to do so.

The fact that a organization such as Teen Vogue whom has a primary base readership of teens from ages 13-18 would promote such material to readers whom are in their adolescence is insulting. To blatantly come out with the idea that it’s wrong that you’re either or boy or girl is absolutely ridiculous. If you want to promote these type of beliefs and opinions do so with a reader base that is mostly 18 years old and older. Don’t target young teens and start to confuse gender facts with subjective beliefs.

I respect the right of an individual to exercise their free-will and identify with whatever sexual and gender orientation they desire, but I will not tolerate the gross misinterpretation of biological fact.

You all at Teen Vogue should be ashamed of yourself for this material and attempting to confuse young children about their gender.

From

Tim Frappier “

 

11:11am – 5-30-19

When I read this article and watched the video I was quite astonished at the fact that Teen Vogue would deny basic biological facts. I have nothing against the LGBTQIA+ movement. I have a very good friend whom is gay and he’s one of the nicest and kindest souls I’ve met.

The point being I don’t mind what gender you identify yourself with, but please don’t blur the distinctions that science has proven. You’re either born a boy or girl, it’s really that simple at the end of the day. I acknowledge and support the individuals free-will to identify with whatever gender they desire. I am a straight male, but I also respect the people’s right to exercise their free-will. If your a male who wants to be gay, be gay and be happy. If your a female and you want to be a lesbian, be a lesbian and be happy.

If your a male and want to be a female, then identify yourself as a female. If your a female and you want to identify yourself as a male, then identify yourself as a male. Yet please don’t make this gender topic complex, because at the end of the day your either born a male or female. It’s not until later on in life that you identify with transgender characteristics and thus exercise your free-will to choose your gender and sexual orientation.

I respects the people’s right to choose what gender and sexual preference they desire, but I also understand no amount of beliefs, thoughts, opinions will change the biological fact your either born a male or female. That is that and this campaign by Teen Vogue is blurring subjective beliefs and biological facts. Which we should avoid if we don’t want our children to be confused about genderism. 

Anyways I want to give a shout out to all your LGBTQIA+ out there and that I appreciate and love you; regardless of your sexual preference because I know we’re all one and that you are worthy to choose whatever gender and sexual preference you desire, but please don’t muddle scientific fact with personal opinions and beliefs.

Peace Out!

Timothy Frappier 

 

Source: VigilantCitizen.com

Teen Vogue, a magazine marketed directly to young people, posted a video on YouTube where various speakers dismiss the science that differentiates the male and female sexes. It is yet another blatant example of the agenda to blur genders.

Teen Vogue recently posted a video on YouTube entitled “5 Common Misconceptions About Sex and Gender” and it is … quite surreal.

The YouTube description says: “7 Activists and LGBTQIA+ people debunk common misconceptions about sex and gender”.

In the video, various speakers (none of them in the field of science) dismiss scientific facts about the human body to replace them with artificial constructs.

To be honest, this was difficult to watch. Because it is NOT about the right of people to live their lives in whatever way they feel happy and comfortable.  

It goes way beyond, into a strange territory of delusion and social engineering. It is about superseding science and replacing it with a radical and extreme agenda that denies the existence of two sexes.

And this is posted by a magazine that caters to young people.

Here’s the video:


Here are some “lowlights”:

The video begins with Belgian model Hanne Gaby Odiele who says:

“Binary is bullsh*t.”

Then, Maria Trida, a producer at Teen Vogue says:

“This idea that the body is either male or female is totally wrong!”

Then, the video adds a thick layer of confusing, non-scientific “facts” to explain sex.

“We all have characteristics that are typically male and typically female, and it is really about political choices, social factors, ideological choices, that we assign meaning to different parts of our body. So, the meaning may be that they meant, most of us are taught that if you have a vagina, you’re a girl; or if you have a p—s, you’re a boy.”

Then the video attacks the fact that chromosomes determine the sex of a human being.

“Saying that a person with XY chromosomes is only male is a narrow way to look at the diverse range of chromosome differences that we can have as a person.”

“Too many people still believe that there’s such a thing as a true sex and that it comes from your chromosomes. It’s not the case. Science has known this for decades, and it’s actually a consensus in science and uncontroversial.”

Then the video explains that a trans woman (a man who decided to become a woman) is actually a biological woman. The video insists that all of the body parts of a trans woman are actually female body parts. One trans woman in the video says:

“My biology is the biology of a woman, regardless of whether or not doctors agree.”

In short, the video wants you to ignore what your eyes can clearly see and to embrace a complex and confusing agenda that denies sex and gender.

What we appear to be witnessing is called Lysenkoism:

“Lysenkoism can be used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives.” – Wikipedia, Lysenkoism

Like most attempts by mass media to blur genders, the video was not well received at all. Here are the first comments one reads under the video:

If you scroll down, the comments keep going:

Sadly, this is not the first attempt by mass media to indoctrinate young people with this agenda. Here’s a segment from the Netflix show Bill Nye Saves the World. Set your face to cringe.

The gender blurring agenda is strong and it has been going on for years. The fact that it is being pushed by the world’s major media outlets tells us that it comes straight from the elite.

Why? For many reasons.

The main one: They want people to be debased and removed as far as possible from anything that makes them grounded and in harmony with life and nature. I mean, they want young people to be confused about being male or female – a basic (easily observable) building block of human life.

Here’s what they’re looking to creation: A population that is lost, confused and depressed. Because these people are the easiest to control and manipulate.

US Navy Pilot reports of UFOs go mainstream

Source: Exopolitics

US-Navy-Pilot-Reports-go-Mainstream

On May 26, 2019, the New York Times published a story about five US Navy pilots reporting UFO sightings in 2014 and 2015 off the coast of Florida. The story cites their descriptions of unknown craft that could fly at hypersonic speeds and hover over the ocean. Their reports were handed off to the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerial Threat Identification Program (AATIP).

The five Navy pilots were interviewed by the New York Times reporters about the UFO sightings that occurred while they were conducting training maneuvers off the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt before deployment to the Middle East. The Times reporters said that due to the 2014 and 2015 sightings, that the Navy upgraded its classified guidance for how pilots are to report UFOs, which now are officially referred to as Unexplained Aerial Phenomena (UAP).

A video was included of one of the UFO incidents where the pilots could be heard exclaiming: “Wow, what is that, man? Look at it fly!” The video had been released over a year earlier and was the subject of a March 12, 2018, Fox News interview with Luis Elizondo, the former Pentagon official, who headed AATIP from its 2007 up to 2017 when he retired in protest over the lack of support the program was receiving.

In the Times story, the pilots made clear that no known piloted aircraft could perform the UFO’s complex aerial maneuvers:

What was strange, the pilots said, was that the video showed objects accelerating to hypersonic speed, making sudden stops and instantaneous turns — something beyond the physical limits of a human crew.

They speculated that the UFOs might be part of a highly advanced drone program that raised several safety issues due to the possibility of a midair collision. They refused to speculate further about the UFO’s origins. Earlier in April 2019, the Navy issued new guidelines for reporting UFO sightings, and cited safety concerns as a factor for the need to improve the reporting process.

There are several important takeaways from this latest New York Times story that follows a December 16, 2017 story that analyzed similar sightings reported by Navy pilots back in 2004.

The first is that the US Navy is allowing….

Read rest of the article here

Navy pilots reveal more details about UFOs as Pentagon admits it studies Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

This is good news that the Pentagon admitted they were tracking and researching UFOs, but I would be weary of this revelation. It references the To The Stars Academy which some have speculated is being used as a proxy for the partial disclosure narrative. There are many competing groups within these secret space programs and it’s been a very hot debate on how to roll out disclosure.

There are many who believe Humanity as a collective cannot handle Full Disclosure; they believe it could be too traumatizing for the public to handle. Which I always felt was kind of odd that they believe they’re capable of knowing the Truth but others are not. The lack of faith in our fellow countrymen and citizens of this world is the cause of this dilemma. You cannot wrap yourself in the American Flag and then claim that the American people cannot handle the Truth.

This is the problem that has been prevalent for many years and these people in positions of authority promoting partial disclosure don’t understand that they are being used by influences that can program humanity without direct interference. The Archons are able to manipulate our subconscious minds without any awareness this is happening on our end. They use our beliefs, thoughts and emotions against us and unfortunately they’ve managed to manipulate the military and government officials into actually believing that the continued policy of lying to the American people is best for all. 

Many of the times these military officials don’t understand that they were groomed into their position by powers that operate in the Etheric and Astral realms; they forge them into a link so that these people fit nicely into the chains of oppression, secrecy, domination, control and enslavement. Certain personality types are identified by the mainframe computer that’s connected to the veil that would most likely result in their cooperation with the NAA or at least remain easily controlled and ignorant to such things. They groom them from their early adolescent years without their awareness at all. They can do that from the safety of the Astral plane. Thus is the reason they discourage any type of esoteric or occult knowledge from being taken seriously.

This is the one thing that society will have to come to understand; that being these Archons had incredible influence and sway over our thoughts, emotions and actions. It’s been like this for at least 26,000 years and the methods in which they’ve maintained control on this planet has been used for millions of years. So these officials have to first grasp the nature of the control system; because without a firm understanding of what is occurring upon this planet they’ll never discover the Truth that they were manipulated. If these military and government officials were truly on our side they would acknowledge the basic tenet of Jesus’s statement of The Truth Will Set You Free” and allow Full Disclosure to happen.

This all ties in with the Air Force Secret Space Program; which according to Michael Salla experienced a profound shift in 2016 when they discovered they were being duped and manipulated by the Deep State. I believe it’s the military and government officials who have access to the Air Force Secret Space Program whom are strongly supporting the partial disclosure narrative. In fact, Cobra has stated that the Chimera Group; which is a Archon group is embedded within the Air Force, thus it makes sense why they don’t support Full Disclosure because of the fact the Archons are manipulating them.

The Air Force Secret Space Program was created as a shield to avoid full disclosure; thus they already had the perquisite that the Deep State was looking for in order to use them as cannon fodder. The Solar Warden on the other hand wants full disclosure and they’re going to make sure it happens; it’s not a matter of if it’s going to happen; it’s a matter of when. It cannot be stopped now; full disclosure will happen, I guarantee it.

There are many people awakening these days by the thousands and we now number in the millions. No longer are there small sects and groups that only possess this knowledge. It’s much more widespread and it’s continuing to spread at an alarming rate. So much so that the Central Race has agreed that humanity as a collective has decided to purge this archontic influence from our planet and are assisting in such endeavors. 

So remember all we’re in this together so lets fight for Full Disclosure!

Timothy Frappier

 

Source: Ancient Code

Long-time Veteran Navy pilots have come forward to the New York Times to reveal their experiences with UFOs of the East coast of America between 2014 and 2015. They say they encountered aircraft that defied all explanation, flying faster and making sudden stops and starts beyond the capability of known human-piloted aircraft. The UFOs could pass by unseen but could be picked up by advanced radar systems.

The pilots, Lieutenant Graves, and Lieutenant Accoin were amazed by what they saw but had no explanation, thinking they could be part of an extremely advanced drone program. Then one of the UFOs almost hit pilots flying in formation. After that, they realized that they might not be dealing with drones, after all.

A squadron mate returned from a mission and told Graves about a shocking and dangerous encounter. The pilots were angry that they had experienced a near miss with the aircraft.

“I almost hit one of those things,” the pilot told Lieutenant Graves.

 

 

According to the Times:

“The pilot and his wingman were flying in tandem about 100 feet apart over the Atlantic east of Virginia Beach when something flew between them, right past the cockpit. It looked to the pilot, Lieutenant Graves said, like a sphere encasing a cube.”

“The incident so spooked the squadron that an aviation flight safety report was filed, Lieutenant Graves said.”

Graves was concerned about the safety of the squadron as the UFOs flew beyond the limits of what a human crew was capable of.

Lt. Graves noted that the UFO combined capabilities for high speed, sudden altitude and direction change, and hovering ability, all without any signs of exhaust fumes or propulsion. Further, the aircraft could remain flying for long lengths of time, sometimes remaining in the air “all day.”

“We have helicopters that can hover,” Lieutenant Graves said. “We have aircraft that can fly at 30,000 feet and right at the surface.” But “combine all that in one vehicle of some type with no jet engine, no exhaust plume.”

The sightings were called the “Roosevelt incidents” after the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt along the East Coast. Super Hornet “Red Rippers” pilots Graves and Accoin came forward to tell the story.

Another incident recorded a huge “Tic Tac” shaped aircraft the “size of a commercial plane” off the coast of San Diego in 2004. Two Navy fighter jet pilots reported the sighting.

The videos of the UFOs named the “GoFast, Gimble,” and “FLIR,” which was the “Tic Tac” craft, were recorded in an official Pentagon report that was later released in redacted form. Following the reports, the Navy issued instructions to the fleet on how to officially report such encounters in 2015.

The pilots and the three videos were part of several closed-door briefings of Congress given over the past year according to CBS Las Vegas. High-ranking Naval officials joined some of the briefings arranged by Christopher Mellon, who formerly worked for the Senate Intelligence Committee and Department and Defense and now works for To The Stars Academy.

“After senior Navy officials joined the briefings, they realized it was indefensible to not have a system that allows more reporting of these incidents,” Mellon told CBS Las Vegas.

See the video from CBS Las Vegas below:

 

 

 

 

Today, a Navy spokesman named Joseph Gradisher says the Navy’s new classified guidance released this year is an update of the 2015 instructions.

You can see Lieutenants Graves and Accoin in the new History Channel series, “Unidentified: Inside America’s U.F.O. Investigation.”

See a preview below:

 

 

 

 

Although the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was officially shut down in 2012, the man who ran the program, Luis Elizondo says the parts of the program remain ongoing and classified in other forms.

Following statements from the Pentagon that AATIP was not really about UFOs and that the three UFO videos released last year were not officially from the DOD, we are seeing a totally new and accurate statement from the Navy today.

A Department of Defense spokesman, Christopher Sherwood told the Post last week that the Department of Defense still investigates claimed sightings of alien spacecraft although the AATIP was officially shut down in 2012.

The big news was that the Pentagon uttered the words “unidentified aerial phenomena,” referring to UFOs in the same manner as the British Ministry of Defence. One UFO investigator for the UK, Nick Pope, called the use of the words a “bombshell revelation.”

“The Department of Defense is always concerned about maintaining positive identification of all aircraft in our operating environment, as well as identifying any foreign capability that may be a threat to the homeland,” Sherwood said.

“The department will continue to investigate, through normal procedures, reports of unidentified aircraft encountered by US military aviators in order to ensure defense of the homeland and protection against strategic surprise by our nation’s adversaries.”

See more from the New York Post below:

 

Elizondo resigned in 2017 in protest over what he called “excessive secrecy surrounding the program and internal opposition to it after funding for the effort ended in 2012.” Afterward, he went to work for To the Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences, a company co-founded by former Blink-182 musician Tom DeLonge.

 

Elizondo recently spoke at the Scientific Conference on Anomalous Aerospace Phenomena, where he asserted that “UFOs ARE Real.” See the video below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Featured image: The aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt via Wikimedia Commons