NY State Senator Gets Sick and Dies After Getting the Flu Shot

by Richard Enos, excerpt

“They need to do additional tests,” she said. “There is no final conclusion yet. They don’t know” what caused the fatal blood infection, she said. “His body was poisoning itself.”

She added, tearfully, “I just came back from viewing the body. The doctor said it’s rare, [given] his age and that it happened so quick … he was healthy. He was a healthy guy.”

The New York Post article mentions nothing about a flu shot that Peralta had taken two weeks earlier.

Peralta Thought Illness Was Due To Flu Shot

This New York Times article had a conversation with his director of communications which revealed something interesting:

He had been ill for at least two weeks, but had been reluctant to visit a doctor, according to Chris Sosa, his director of communications. After much prodding he finally went for an exam recently, and he had a follow-up scheduled for December.

“It was like pulling teeth to get him to talk about not feeling well,” Mr. Sosa said. “He just thought he was having symptoms related to getting the flu shot.”

That last point is important. Often when a person is sick, they have a pretty good idea what caused it. When we have a hangover, we obviously look to what we drank. When we have food poisoning, we can usually pinpoint what it is that we ate that was the problem.

With Peralta thinking that he was suffering from symptoms related to the flu shot, it means that he must have felt fine before the flu shot, and starting feeling symptoms after, perhaps even right after receiving the flu shot.

Ironically, Peralta was a strong advocate for the flu shot, and in fact was coordinating a flu shot clinic in his district only days earlier. Perhaps his advocacy of it contributed to his reluctance to seek medical help for his symptoms.

Is The Flu Vaccine Causing Deadly Flu?

This National Health Federation article gives us reason to suspect that not only is the flu vaccine ineffective in preventing the flu, the flu vaccine may actually be delivering a deadly strain of flu virus to people:

On January 8, 2018, the Santa Barbara Independent reported that eight Santa Barbara County residents over age 65 – all but one of whom had been newly vaccinated and had also received flu medications from urgent-care centers – had died of the flu.

That compared to three flu-related deaths in the prior year. The H3N2 flu strain, reported to be resistant to vaccination, was cited as the primary viral component in these deaths.[3]

By January 12th, the Los Angeles Daily News reported there were 36 flu-related deaths this season in California for adults under age 65 compared to 13 for the same time last year.[4] No data was given as to whether these subjects had been newly vaccinated.

The same article gives some corroboration to the idea that the recent version of the flu shot was the cause of infection and death. It relates the story of a CDC researcher that began to speak about how the flu shot was actually transmitting a deadly vaccine-resistant strain of the flu before he ‘disappeared’:

The body of a missing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) researcher has been found. Timothy Cunningham, 25, was last seen on February 12th. Cunningham headed up a research team with the CDC’s Division of Population Health.

Cunningham had made claims, shortly before his disappearance, that a “catastrophic” flu shot was the cause of this year’s deadly flu epidemic that reportedly killed thousands.

Cunningham reportedly mentioned that “if something happened to him” he wished his name to be made public. Cunningham was a Harvard-trained epidemiologist and U.S. Navy officer.

His body was recovered in the Chattahoochee River in Northwest Atlanta on April 3rd, over fifty days since he was reported missing.

Related:LV Man Lost His Vision and the Ability to Walk One Day After Receiving the Flu Shot

The Takeaway

The amount of evidence that brings vaccine safety into question is too voluminous to all compile together, even in a large book, and it follows an all-too-familiar pattern: we are dealing with an industry that values profit, not people.

The historical rise in the promotion and usage of vaccines correlates to the rise of disease and death from illnesses like the flu. That fact alone should be enough for us to write off taking vaccines altogether.

I ascribe to the principle of the Hippocratic oath, ‘First, do no harm.’ And if this credo was actually followed by the Western Medical Establishment, then there would always have been proper testing on the safety of their vaccines, and in all likelihood, most or all of them would have been abandoned long ago.

$4 Billion and Growing:U.S. Payouts for Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Keep Climbing

Advertisements

Propaganda Machine of $4.3 Billion Influenza Vaccine Industry Is in Full Swing

Source: Humans Are Free

Flu season is upon us again — the time of year when the steady message is “Have you gotten your flu shot yet?”

Considering the many studies showing flu vaccines offer minimal protection against illness even when well-matched to circulating viral strains, the fact that vaccination continues to be touted as your first line of defense against influenza suggests this annual campaign is more about generating conformity for profit rather than actually improving and protecting public health.

Questionable Data Used to Support Annual Flu Vaccination Campaigns

Statistics reveal that in most years, flu shots are at best 50 to 60 percent effective at preventing lab confirmed type A or B influenza requiring medical care.1 In the decade between 2005 and 2015, the influenza vaccine was less than 50 percent effective more than half of the time.2

The 2017/2018 flu vaccine was a perfect example of this trend. The overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness against influenza A and B virus infection was just 36 percent.3

According to a 2014 meta-analysis,4 71 people have to be vaccinated in order for a single case of influenza to be avoided — a ratio that speaks to the ineffectiveness of this annual routine. Adding insult to injury, evidence5 (which was confirmed three years later6) suggests flu vaccination may double your risk of contracting pandemic influenza or a more serious bout of influenza.

Research7 published in 2011 also warned the seasonal flu vaccine appears to weaken children’s immune systems and increases their chances of getting sick from influenza viruses not included in the vaccine.

When blood samples from healthy, unvaccinated children and children who had received an annual flu shot were compared, the unvaccinated group had naturally built up more antibodies across a wider variety of influenza strains compared to the vaccinated group.8

Evidence also shows you can get vaccinated, show few or no symptoms and still shed and transmit influenza to other people.9,10 Flu vaccines are also associated with debilitating and potentially lifelong side effects such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.

2018/2019 Flu Season Brings Back Failed Nasal Spray Vaccine

Flu vaccines are by their nature a tricky business because influenza viruses are constantly evolving and public health officials have to guess at least six months before the flu season starts which type A and B influenza virus strains might end up being predominant so drug companies can manufacture the vaccines.

When the strains chosen do not match the strains actually causing most of the disease in any given flu season, the vaccine’s failure rate significantly increases. But it’s also important to realize that the majority of respiratory influenza-like illness that people experience during any given flu season is not type A or B influenza.11

When you get a sore throat, runny nose, headache, fatigue, low grade fever, body aches and cough, most of the time it is another type of viral or bacterial respiratory infection unrelated to influenza viruses.12

In fact, data13,14,15,16 shows other types of viruses are responsible for about 80 percent of all respiratory infections during any given flu season. The flu vaccine does not protect against or prevent any of these other types of respiratory infections causing influenza-like-illness (ILI) symptoms.

The chance of contracting actual type A or B influenza, caused by one of the three or four influenza virus strains included in the vaccine, is much lower compared to getting sick with another type of viral or bacterial infection during the flu season.

All of that said, there are several different types of influenza vaccines to choose from in any given year. This year, the live attenuated nasal spray vaccine (FluMist), which the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices did not recommend during the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons due to its extreme ineffectiveness, is back and once again being recommended by the CDC.17

For the 2018/2019 season, FluMist is approved for nonpregnant individuals between the ages of 2 and 49. Exceptions18 include children taking aspirin- or salicylate-containing medications, those with suppressed immune function, children aged 2 to 4 who have asthma, those who have taken an antiviral drug in the previous 48 hours, and a few others.

High-Dose Flu Vaccine for Seniors — ‘Costs Outweigh Benefits’ Canadian Experts Say

You also have the injectable inactivated influenza vaccines, including a high-dose version for seniors over the age of 65, which contains four times the amount of antigen as the regular dose of the standard vaccine.

In Canada, infectious disease experts have spoken out against the vaccine, saying it’s not effective enough to justify its high cost, which is about five times that of the regular flu vaccine.19

According to British Columbia’s provincial health officer Bonnie Henry, research suggests 200 seniors would have to be vaccinated with Fluzone High-Dose to prevent a single case of influenza, and 4,000 would have to be vaccinated to prevent one flu-related hospitalization.20

Due to its poor performance, British Columbia, Quebec, Alberta, New Brunswick and Newfoundland will not cover the cost of Fluzone High-Dose for seniors who would otherwise get free regular flu shots.

The Globe and Mail reports:21

“The divergent policies are part of a continuing debate over the targeted flu shot that experts say has major implications for future influenza vaccination programs — and the amount of money it costs to deliver them …

“Danuta Skowronski, epidemiology lead of influenza and emerging respiratory pathogens at the BC Centre for Disease Control, said the benefits don’t justify the price.

“She also said the new flu shot has only been studied for a few seasons and that there are unanswered questions health policy officials should consider before they get locked into an expensive multiyear agreement.

“For instance, emerging research suggests people who get repeat flu shots every year may actually experience reduced immunity in subsequent years. That could have implications for seniors who receive a high dose of the flu shot, she said.”

U.S. Government Statistics: Flu Shot is the Most Dangerous Vaccine in America

What You Need to Know About Flu Vaccines Made From Dog Kidney and Insect Cells

A relative newcomer in the vaccine lineup is the quadrivalent influenza vaccine called Flucelvax, which became available during the 2017/2018 season. Approved for individuals over the age of 4, this vaccine is unique in that it uses dog kidney (MDCK) cells for production.22

Traditionally, candidate vaccine strain influenza viruses, i.e., the viruses selected for inclusion in the vaccine, have been produced using fertilized chicken eggs.

Flucelvax viruses are grown in cultured animal cells instead.23 (Another relatively new technology uses insect (army worm) cells to produce a recombinant quadrivalent influenza vaccine, Flublok, for individuals over 18 years old.24,25)

As the effectiveness of conventional flu shots continues to leave much to be desired, the new Flucelvax vaccine was touted as a new-and-improved version that would protect more people once flu season hit. In reality, a study26 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed its benefit was quite modest.

While flu vaccines overall were only 24 percent effective in preventing flu-related hospitalizations in people aged 65 and older, the Flucelvax vaccine had an effectiveness rate of 26.5 percent in that population — hardly a major improvement.

It’s been known for some time that growing flu vaccines in eggs may lead to problematic mutations that make them less effective against circulating influenza viruses. Such was the case during the 2016 to 2017 flu season, when H3N2 viruses were prevalent.

Writing in PNAS,27 researchers noted, “Human vaccine strains grown in eggs often possess adaptive mutations that increase viral attachment to chicken cells.” They identified a mutation in the flu vaccine strain that produced antibodies that didn’t work well to neutralize the H3N2 viruses circulating that year.

But the hope that cell-based vaccines might solve this problem appears overly optimistic. Dr. John Treanor, a flu vaccine expert at the University of Rochester Medical Center, told STAT News in 2017,28 “There wasn’t convincing evidence that it [cell culture flu vaccine] was better, so why would anyone spend extra money to buy that?”

This was before the FDA data came in on the 2017 to 2018 season, which offered proof that the effectiveness was virtually identical to the conventional egg-based version.

Lack of Quality Vaccine Science and Transparency

In his 2013 article,29 “Influenza: Marketing Vaccine by Marketing Disease,” BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, Ph.D., points out the lack of quality science underpinning the annual call for flu vaccination and the government’s lack of transparency. He noted that in its marketing of influenza vaccines, the CDC fails to uphold its pledge “to base all public health decisions on the highest quality scientific data, openly and objectively derived.”

The Vaccine Reaction summarizes Doshi’s comments, in part:30

“Promotion of influenza vaccines is one of the most visible and aggressive public health policies today … Closer examination of influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims.

“The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated … Mandatory vaccination policies have been enacted … forcing some people to take the vaccine under threat of losing their jobs.

“The main assertion of the CDC that fuels the push for flu vaccinations each year is that influenza comes with a risk of serious complications which can cause death …

“The only randomized trial of influenza vaccine in older people found no decrease in deaths. This means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in older people despite any clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in serious outcomes.

“Even when the vaccine is closely matched to the type of influenza that’s prevalent … randomized, controlled trials of healthy adults found that vaccinating between 33 and 100 people resulted in one less case of influenza … For most people, and possibly most doctors, officials need only claim that vaccines save lives, and it is assumed there must be solid research behind it.”

Health Care Worker Flu Shot Mandates Are Based on Four Invalid Trials

A perfect example of what Doshi is talking about was published January 2017. This scientific analysis31,32 of four randomized controlled trials, which claim vaccinating health care workers against influenza offers significant protection for patients, were in fact overstated, and grossly so.

According to the authors:

“In attributing patient benefit to increased health care worker influenza vaccine coverage, each cluster randomized controlled trial was found to violate the basic mathematical principle of dilution by reporting greater percentage reductions with less influenza-specific patient outcomes … and/or patient mortality reductions exceeding even favorably-derived predicted values by at least six- to 15fold.

“If extrapolated to all long-term care facilities and hospital staff in the United States, the prior cluster randomized controlled trial-claimed number needed to vaccinate of 8 would implausibly mean > 200,000 and > 675,000 patient deaths, respectively, could be prevented annually by health care worker influenza vaccination, inconceivably exceeding total U.S. population mortality estimates due to seasonal influenza each year, or during the 1918 pandemic, respectively.

“More realistic recalibration based on actual patient data instead shows that at least 6,000 to 32,000 hospital workers would need to be vaccinated before a single patient death could potentially be averted.”

The researchers concluded that these four trials, which are the basis for policies of enforced vaccination of health care workers “attribute implausibly large reductions in patient risk to health care worker vaccination, casting serious doubts on their validity,” adding that “The impression that unvaccinated health care workers place their patients at great influenza peril is exaggerated.”

Independent Scientists Unable to Obtain Vaccine Trial Data

Europe also suffers from the same lack of transparency in vaccine research and public policy, as evidenced by Cochrane scientists’ failure to obtain the necessary vaccine trial data required to evaluate the quality of 11 clinical trials on the HPV vaccine held by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Detailed information about a study’s design, conduct and outcome can only be found in the trial’s clinical study report (CSR), which drug companies are required to submit when applying for a new drug license. Transparimed.org reports:33

“Since 2014, in theory, independent scientists can access these documents by filing a request with the European regulator. In practice, the Cochrane team reports:

“‘After three years, we had obtained just 18 Clinical Study Reports (62 percent of the EMA’s 29 reports) … Unfortunately, the reports still lacked important sections, such as protocols and serious harms narratives … Only three reports included completed case report forms … One study report of 4,263 pages was released in 17 files across seven batches over 12 months.'”

What’s more, the Cochrane scientists discovered that the EMA itself does not always receive all of the scientific evidence, as some of the submitted CSRs were incomplete. The team’s attempts to obtain the CSRs directly from the drug companies were equally fruitless.

According to Cochrane:

“Although GlaxoSmithKline published versions of its Clinical Study Reports on its trial register, the reports often lack serious adverse events narratives and case report forms, and the data on serious adverse events in the reports we downloaded was heavily redacted.”

Needless to say, without access to the CSRs, independent scientists such as the Cochrane group cannot assess the benefits and harms of the drugs or vaccines under review with any significant degree of accuracy or confidence.

“In our view, independent researchers ought to be able to obtain complete and unredacted Clinical Study Reports within a reasonable time frame without too many constraints or limitations,” Cochrane writes.

“[R]egulators should release complete and coherent Clinical Study Reports… Urgent changes are essential for open and transparent assessment of the harms and benefits of interventions.”

Professor Makes Bizarre Claim for Children’s ‘Vaccination Rights’

In related news, Arthur L. Caplan, Ph.D.,34 a New York University (NYU) professor and founding head of the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU School of Medicine, raised more than a few eyebrows by claiming that a child’s presumed right to be vaccinated supersedes the parents’ legal right to exercise informed consent to vaccination on behalf of minor children.

In plain English, Caplan believes minor children should be vaccinated according to government recommendations regardless of whether parents have made an informed decision to decline one or more vaccinations for their child. As reported by The Vaccine Reaction,35 Caplan “claims that vaccinating children represents a higher moral imperative than respecting the informed consent rights of parents.”

“‘I want to point out a moral stance that I don’t think has gotten enough attention, which is that every child has the right to be vaccinated,’ said Caplan. ‘We keep talking about parents’ right to say yes or no, to avoid mandates or requirements, or to do what they choose to do. Someone has to speak up and say, ‘Well, what about the kids? Don’t they have any rights?’

“Caplan believes that if parents refuse to vaccinate their kids the government has the right to override the legal right of parents to make medical care decisions for their children. Caplan argues that the government has the duty to vaccinate the children without the consent of the parents and by force, if need be.”

In other words, what Caplan is saying is that parents should be prevented from making medical care decisions, especially vaccination decisions, on behalf of their minor children if those decisions do not conform with government policy. What kind of freedom is that? Coming from a self-appointed medical ethicist, this is scary, mind-boggling stuff. It’s barely one step away from all children being treated like property of the government.

Disturbingly enough, attempts to move this kind of public health policy and law forward are already underway, and parents everywhere need to join in the fight to retain their right to make medical decisions for their minor children. If government officials can vaccinate your child against your will, there’s no telling where it will end. As reported by The Vaccine Reaction:

“Legislation has been introduced in states like California that would seek to give government the right to make health care decisions for children, even against the wishes of their parents, if the state deems the decisions to be in the best interests of the children.

“Such legislation would also allow government authorities to take legal physical custody of children in cases where parents refuse to comply with mandates forcing or coercing them to vaccinate their children.

“The thrust of Caplan’s thought process is that, at least when it comes to vaccination of children, parents should be stripped of their informed consent rights. Apparently, Caplan takes the view that the informed health care decisions that parents make for their children are just not relevant if those decisions conflict with government policy.

“But it is precisely this ‘long held legal right to make informed, voluntary decisions about pharmaceutical products and medical procedures that carry risks for their children,’ says Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center, that is ‘all that stands between parents and exploitation of their children by those in positions of power in society with a personal or professional vested interest in forcing every child to use pharmaceutical products that are not safe or effective for every child.'”

By Dr. Joseph Mercola, Guest author

From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you, too, are fed up with their deception. You want practical health solutions without the hype, and that’s what I offer.

References:

You are 550% more likely to get a respiratory infection if you receive the flu vaccine

(Natural News) Let’s assume for a moment that the flu vaccine provided a 100 percent guarantee against contracting influenza (which it doesn’t, but just pretend it does). Would it make sense to vaccinate your family against the flu if doing so meant you increased their risk of contracting other upper respiratory illnesses by more than five times? Of course not! Reducing the risk of contracting one illness only to heighten the risk of multiple others is simply illogical. And yet that is exactly what the flu vaccine – which is only between 33 and 70 percent effective, anyway – does.

A study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases actually found that not only did the inactivated influenza vaccine not provide additional protection against the flu virus, but it also left recipients lacking in “temporary non-specific immunity that protected against other respiratory viruses.” (Related: Flu vaccine BOMBSHELL: 630% more “aerosolized flu virus particles” emitted by people who received flu shots… flu vaccines actually SPREAD the flu.)

Playing Russian roulette with the flu shot

Natural Health 365 reported that while U.S. authorities have tended to look the other way regarding flu vaccine side effects, researchers in China have been far more proactive about determining exactly what the effects of these vaccines might be. The study mentioned above, which was conducted in Hong Kong, set out to compare the health of vaccinated patients versus those who have not been immunized in relation to either the flu and other illnesses.

The trial included patients between the ages of 6 and 15, some of whom received Sanofi Pasteur’s Vaxigrip vaccine, while others received a saline placebo shot. The participants were then tracked for an average of 272 days to see whether they went on to develop the flu and/or other illnesses.

Mother Nature’s micronutrient secret: Organic Broccoli Sprout Capsules now available, delivering 280mg of high-density nutrition, including the extraordinary “sulforaphane” and “glucosinolate” nutrients found only in cruciferous healing foods. Every lot laboratory tested. See availability here.

The researchers concluded:

There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of confirmed seasonal influenza infection between recipients of TIV [trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine] or placebo, although the point estimate was consistent with protection in TIV recipients … However, participants who received TIV had higher risk of ARI [acute respiratory illness] associated with confirmed noninfluenza respiratory virus infection (RR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.31–14.8). Including 2 additional confirmed infections when participants did not report ARI, TIV recipients had higher risk of confirmed noninfluenza respiratory virus infection (RR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.19–10.1). The majority of the noninfluenza respiratory virus detections were rhinoviruses and coxsackie/echoviruses, and the increased risk among TIV recipients was also statistically significant for these viruses (Table 3). Most respiratory virus detections occurred in March 2009, shortly after a period of peak seasonal influenza activity in February 2009. [Emphasis added]

A better way

So, not only is the flu shot ineffective, but it increases risk of other viral infections. It is also known to carry serious side effects, including seizures and convulsions, swelling on the brain and Guillain-Barre syndrome, to name a few. (Related: Flu vaccine paradox spreading globally as more vaccinated people catch the flu.)

That doesn’t mean, however, that we all need to just concede defeat and get the flu every year. Being proactive about building up your family’s immunity before the flu season can provide protection against a host of illnesses.

The first important step is to avoid foods and drinks that add stress to the immune system, including sugar, processed foods, dairy, gluten, soy and alcohol. It is also important to maintain adequate hydration by drinking plenty of pure, filtered water. Increase your intake of fresh, organic produce and herbs, including those that have antiviral and antibacterial benefits like garlic and ginger. Be sure to get enough rest.

It is also advisable to support the liver and immune system by supplementing with high-quality vitamin C, turmeric and Reishi mushroom from a trusted, clean source. Probiotics, vitamin D and zinc are also important in the fight to boost immunity.

There is a better, safer way to protect your family’s health this winter than by playing Russian roulette with the dangerous flu vaccine. Learn more at Vaccines.news.

Sources include:

NaturalHealth365.com

Academic.OUP.com

HealthImpactNews.com

Can Vaccines Be Tied Into Social Engineering, Artificial Intelligence And Transhumanism?

Source: Activist Post

A Neuro-Musculoskeletal Specialist MD Explains

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Before I drop some rather shocking vaccine information on readers relative to Artificial Intelligence [AI] and Transhumanism, and how most of today’s technologies are structured toward programming the human brain/mind to become a part of AI, let me just say that when I studied human nutrition, pregnant women were advised not to take any sort of medications, including aspirin! What’s happened that today, mothers-to-be are shot up with several vaccines?

A well-qualified and learned physician, Dr Graham Downing, who is a Neuro-musculoskeletaland Functional Medicine consultant in the UK, was interviewed on The Richie Allen Showposted November 24, 2016 where he dropped scientific information about how vaccines work in pregnant women, their fetuses and in vaccinated infants.  Those disclosures are something no one would want not to know, I think, as Dr Downing’s statements about the published science involved point to why so many vaccines apparently are being invented and will be mandated for all humans.

Here’s a hint: Vaccines may be part and parcel of the New World Order’s agenda for Artificial Intelligence and Transhumanism!

As Dr Downing points out, vaccinating pregnant women induces and/or creates inflammation in their bodies and also increases the risk of releasing inflammatory markers in their fetuses/infants. Such releases include phenotypes [the set of observable characteristics of an individual resulting from the interaction of its genotype with the environment (1)].

Aren’t vaccines an environmental health hazard chock full of neurotoxic ingredients, e.g., ethylmercury (Thimerosal), aluminum, formaldehyde/Formalin, and other chemicals e.g., sodium borate, detergent, polysorbate 80, inset cells, human fetal cells (diploid), [7] etc.?  That sounds more like a HazMat situation, or even a toxic waste dump, rather than some prophylactic to improve immunity!

Furthermore, Doctor contends that from vaccines there’s an increase in inflammatory cells, which also are elevated in the fetal brain where cytokines release glutamates.  The prefrontal lobes and the limbic system, which involves human emotions, are affected in fetuses from pregnancy vaccines administered to moms-to-be.

According to Dr Downing, vaccines damage the front part of the brain!  Aluminum, aka aluminium, a vaccine adjuvant in four formulations, prohibits glutathione production which is needed for detoxification.  Furthermore, a pharmaceutical-created-enzyme-deficiencyprevents detoxification capabilities for baby.  Purkinje cells in the brain also are damaged.

Additionally, pregnancy vaccines create physiological distress in pregnant women along with impacting the developing right hemisphere of the male fetus.  Gross motor skills in male fetuses are impacted negatively, which coincides with more males being diagnosed with Autism.  The right hemisphere of the brain controls social skills.  “The research is there.”

Another ‘tool’ in the AI project is computers, the computer tablet, and their games ostensibly designed to be addictive!  They decrease the frontal brain activity, according to Dr Downing.  All those computer games on phones and iPads ‘inadvertently’ have a ‘designed or accidental purpose’ in addition to being entertainment.  Those computer games apparently decrease frontal lobe and the anterior cingulate cortex activity, creating “a mess in the brain,” he says.

One of the scary points Dr Downing makes is that cell phones are creating social problems by messing with human brains.  [Microwaves cause electromagnetic frequencies that impact the human brain greatly and their damage is called non-thermal adverse health effects, I offer.]

Small children, who are two and three years old using computers-games apparently experience increases in dopamine, a brain neurotransmitter, according to Dr Downing.  Psychopaths have high dopamine!

How does the Artificial Intelligence Agenda fit in?

Is AI a deliberate agenda or is it for corporate profits, Dr Downing asks.   Dr Downing says there are five year and fifteen year goals for AI.  The fifteen year goal is to have AI run everything, including humans!  You have to listen to his comments about that aspect—one word: “frightening!”   To ‘authentic’ his remarks, Doctor cited a report issued by the White House, “A Federal Vision for Future Computing: A Nanotechnology-inspired Grand Challenge.”  Here’s what that 15-page report is about:

Create a new type of computer that can proactively interpret and learn from data, solve unfamiliar problems using what it has learned, and operate with the energy efficiency of the human brain. [3]

[Basically, it’s an artificial brain to replace the human brain.  Also, they want to create a newsoul for humans, too!]

Guess who’s involved?

Collaborating Agencies: Department of Energy (DOE), National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense (DOD), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Intelligence Community (IC) [3]

What does that tell you?

However, Dr Downing says that Stephen Hawking [4] supposedly is afraid of Artificial Intelligence: “potentially more dangerous than nukes.”  And we will allow that to happen to us and our children?

How about “artificial intelligence for autistic kids”!

Ostensibly and according to Dr Downing, today’s humans are an obsolete version of Silicon Valley’s dream of what humans ought to be.  Do you consider yourself obsolete?

You can hear Dr Downing’s scientific discussion about vaccines, pregnancy and the Artificial Intelligence—Transhumanism agenda on the “Unborn Babies Being Prepared for AI and Transhumanism through Vaccines and Medicine” show in this video.

William Casey, former CIA Director (1981), supposedly said, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”  If that were a prognostication of sorts, then what do you think about pregnant women mandated to receive vaccines; 24-hour-old neonates being injected with the Hepatitis B vaccine; and 2, 4 and 6-month-old babies receiving up to nine vaccines at one time in view of what Dr Downing says about brain damage from vaccines?

‘Vaccines are safe’ is the fraudulent-science-prone CDC and FDA’s mantra.

Why has autism, first reported in 1943 as Kanner syndrome [5], skyrocketed from one in 10,000/15,000 in the late 1970s to one in 68 [1 in 68 children (1 in 42 boys and 1 in 189 girls)] according to the CDC’s 2014 statistics?  Recall what Dr Downing said about the brain’s developing right hemisphere in male fetuses and their gross motor skills when their pregnant mothers received vaccines.

“There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good.” – Dr. J. Anthony Morris, Former Chief Vaccine Control Officer, US FDA

“The only safe vaccine is one that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon, MD, Former Director, National Institutes of Health (1955-1968)

“The incidence of asthma has been found to be five times more common in vaccinated children.” – The Lancet, 1994. [6]

Why is the U.S. Congress stonewalling on its oversight duty concerning HHS, CDC and FDA regarding toxic vaccines and validly-documented, whistleblower-proven, scientific fraud at the CDC [8], and not rescinding the “get out of jail free” card it gave to vaccine makers in 1986?  In this short video, there’s more discussion about CDC fraud.

‘Vaccines are safe’ is the fraudulent-science-prone CDC and FDA’s mantra.

 

Other countries citizens can sue for vaccine damages; why has Congress disenfranchised U.S. citizens of our rights to legal redress for health damages under U.S. product liability laws?  Good question?!

Lastly: “social engineering” of vaccines and the false meme being constructed around them

November 21, 2016, New York University’s Langone Medical Center in NYC held its “Confronting Vaccine Resistance: Strategies For Success” conference, which Dr Suzanne Humphries, MD, of “Dissolving Illusions” fame attended, took notes and graciously shared with the VAXXED production crew’s Polly Tommey.  Dr Humphries contends the conference was about “social engineering of medical professionals” regarding the forcing of vaccine mandates upon parents and those who question vaccines.

The conference panel included pro-vax luminaries like Paul Offit, MD, co-inventor of a rotavirus vaccine; Senator Richard Pan, MD, the propelling force behind California’s draconian SB277; and Dorit Rubenstein Reiss, PhD, pro-vaccine acolyte [9] among others who waxed profusely about how to ‘sell’ vaccines—or should I say—force vaccines onto parents, especially those who have questions and take more of pediatricians and doctors office time!

After watching the 45 minute video of Dr Humphries’ debriefing of that conference, I think she may have been describing what may literally have been a ‘tar and feather anecdotal fest’ about those who question the supposed safety and fraud in vaccines.

By the way, Dr Humphries says that the medical term “herd immunity” has been nixed in favor of “community immunity,” which they are pushing to have 99 percent of the population conform to!

However, what many question is the FACT that medical doctors who have gone through the indoctrination process of medical school; earned their ‘stripes’ and degrees; passed the rigors of internship; and have pushed and injected vaccines experience a complete change of mind and heart to the point where, after being confronted by well-informed parents about the dangers of vaccines, even issue letters of apology to their patients.  Here’s one from Dr Rachael L Ross, MD, PhD.

Even the CDC had to issue an ‘apology’ of sorts about the flu vaccine.  In 2014 the warning went like this

How many readers know about or have seen the apology that CDC whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, sent to none other than Dr Andrew Wakefield, which is most revealing?, I’d say:

“I apologize again for the price you paid for my dishonesty.”

[To which Dr Wakefield replied:]

“I forgive you completely and without any bitterness.”

[Dr William Thompson’s reply:]

“I know you mean it and i am grateful to know you more personally.”

Text message between Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Dr. William Thompson, Aug 27, 2014
http://truthbarrier.com/2014/09/02/breaking-news-cdc-whistleblower-text-messages-to-andy-wakefield-study-would-have-supported-his-scientific-opinion/

Now, please take in and enjoy Dr Suzanne Humphries’ exceptional debriefing about the NYU ‘social engineering’ vaccine conference.  Note what’s said about Measles around 36 minutes on the timeline.

Just for the record: I, and just about every child in the 1940s when I was in grade school, contracted all the childhood communicable infectious diseases: Measles, German measles, Chickenpox—the ones I lived through, as did every child in school, on the block where I lived and never was there any scare tactic by the medical profession about death from Measles or any of the other ‘childhood diseases’!  Moms knew how to treat those diseases without antibiotics and the pharmaceuticals available today.  Do you believe that?!

As a matter of fact, mothers took their children to homes where kids had those diseases for ‘parties’ so their children could be exposed to them, contract them and get them over with during childhood, as they would “fine tune” the immune system and provide life-long immunity [not financially profitable for Big Pharma], plus females could pass along those benefits to their fetuses/children!  Not so today, since the mandated vaccines ‘castrate’ the immune system so everyone who’s been vaccinated needs to get booster shots [profitable for Big Pharma], per the mandated schedules of the CDC and FDA!

What a rasher of scientific bull and scare tactics has been served up to the medical community, gullible-believing parents, and legislators who enjoy Big Pharma’s lobbying gifts, but obviously don’t realize the harm they are doing to their constituents by accepting, endorsing and promoting deliberate scientific fraud [10-11] ginned up by the vaccine industry apparently everywhere.

References:

[1] https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=phenotype
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purkinje_cell
[3] https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/federal-vision-for-nanotech-inspired-future-computing-grand-challenge.pdf
[4] http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/ai-could-destroy-humans-stephen-hawking-fears-should-you-worry-1.2864576
[5] http://simonsfoundation.s3.amazonaws.com/share/071207-leo-kanner-autistic-affective-contact.pdf
[6] Quotes from Doctors Regarding Vaccination
http://vaccine-injury.info/
[7] http://www.cdc.gov/VACCINEs/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdCU2DfMBpU
[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorit_Rubinstein_Reiss
[10] http://vaccines.news/2016-03-07-fraud-continues-to-run-rampant-in-the-vaccine-industry-as-officials-turn-a-blind-eye-on-big-pharmas-criminal-activities.html
[11] http://www.vaccines.news/2016-04-05-chinas-vaccine-infrastructure-found-to-be-run-by-criminals-and-fraudsters-just-like-the-vaccine-industry-in-the-usa.html

Resources:

Graham Downing, MD
www.myurbandoctor.com

Brain Damage/Death from Vaccines is NOT Rare
http://vaccine-injury.info/

Gardasil Vaccine: Spain Joins Growing List of Countries to File Criminal Complaints
https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/gardasil-vaccine-spain-joins-growing-list-of-countries-to-file-criminal-complaints/

Victims of HPV Vaccine in Japan Will Sue State and Vaccine Makers
http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/04/victims-of-hpv-vaccine-in-japan-will-sue-state-and-vaccine-makers/

Legal Precedent in Colombia: Landmark decision for HPV vaccine survivor
http://sanevax.org/legal-precedent-colombia-landmark-decision-hpv-vaccine-survivor/

India: Supreme Court HPV Vaccine Controversy Continues
http://sanevax.org/india-supreme-court-hpv-vaccine-controversy-continues/

Gardasil: 32 Complaints filed in France
http://sanevax.org/gardasil-32-complaints-filed-france/

Febrile Convulsions after Flu Shot: CSL denies responsibility [Australia]
http://sanevax.org/febrile-convulsions-after-flu-shot-csl-denies-responsibility/

MMR Vaccine Takes a Hit in Italian Court
http://sanevax.org/mmr-vaccine-takes-a-hit-in-italian-court/

17 Years of Litigation Yields 3 Million Euros for Vaccine Injury Victim [France]
http://sanevax.org/17-years-of-litigation-yields-3-million-euros-for-vaccine-injury-victim/

Parents sue after Quebec teen dies following Gardasil injection [Canada]
http://sanevax.org/parents-sue-after-quebec-teen-dies-following-gardasil-vaccination/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Image Credit

5 Historical Vaccine Scandals Suppressed by the Establishment

“It is… ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated.” ~ Glen Dettman AMM, BA, PhD., FAPM

This article examines in detail 5 historical vaccine scandals suppressed by the medical establishment, including deceptions, coverups, and empirical statistics we were clearly meant to forget. As you’ll see, these examples reveal the fraud of the vaccination paradigm and prove conclusively that opposition from the science/medical community is neither unscientific nor new to the “anti-vaxx” movement of the modern era, as the establishment would have us believe.

By Brendan D. Murphy

Let’s start at the start…

The Frauds of Vaccination’s Founding Father

Edward Jenner (1749-1823) has been lauded as a medical pioneer and saver of the lives of millions for supposedly developing the earliest crude forms of vaccination. But is he really all that? Was he even an original thinker? Or simply a charlatan? See for yourself…

Jenner set up practice as a “surgeon” in Berkeley in the 1700s but, in fact, he did not earn the title of “doctor” at all. Jenner’s history is actually quite amusing. As Dr Walter Hadwen, JP, MD, LRCP, MRCS, LSA., explained during an address in 1896:

“Now this man Jenner had never passed a medical examination in his life. He belonged to the good old times when George III was King— (laughter)—when medical examinations were not compulsory. Jenner looked upon the whole thing as a superfluity, and he hung up ‘Surgeon, apothecary’, over his door without any of the qualifications that warranted the assumption. It was not until twenty years after he was in practice that he thought it advisable to get a few letters after his name. Consequently he then communicated with a Scotch University and obtained the degree of Doctor of Medicine for the sum of £15 and nothing more. (Laughter.) It is true that a little while before, he had obtained a Fellowship of the Royal Society, but his latest biographer and apologist, Dr. Norman Moore, had to confess that it was obtained by little less than a fraud. It was obtained by writing a most extraordinary paper about a fabulous cuckoo, for the most part composed of arrant absurdities and imaginative freaks such as no ornithologist of the present day would pay the slightest heed to. A few years after this, rather dissatisfied with the only medical qualification he had obtained, Jenner communicated with the University of Oxford and asked them to grant him their honorary degree of M.D., and after a good many fruitless attempts he got it. Then he sent to the Royal College of Physicians in London to get their diploma, and even presented his Oxford degree as an argument in his favour. But they considered he had had quite enough on the cheap already, and told him distinctly that until he passed the usual examinations they were not going to give him any more.” ~ Dr Walter Hadwen, 1896 [1] [bold emphases added]

So, after about 20 years of practicing his special brand of “medicine,” Jenner (the professional bullshit artist) realized he might benefit from some extra letters after his name, and thus it was that in 1790, Jenner simply bought a medical degree for £15. This is the man who helped create what is now a multi-billion dollar medical empire — a person who was not only a complete fraud and confidence man, but evidently a pathological liar.

Let’s continue the timeline…

1791: Edward Jenner vaccinated his 18 month old son with swine-pox and eight years later in 1798 with cow-pox. His son died of tuberculosis (TB) at the age of 21, and Jenner thereafter chooses not to vaccinate his second son. (Yes, he became a “refuser” of sorts, at least where his own family’s health was concerned!)

1796: Edward Jenner in Gloucestershire, England, was falsely credited with the concept of vaccination, which he actually appropriated from dairy maids. Dr. Hadwen in his 1896 address explained:

“He was not, however, the discoverer [of the vaccine concept]. The whole thing was a superstition of the Gloucestershire dairymaids years before Jenner was born—(laughter)—and the very experiment, so-called, that he performed had been performed by an old farmer named Benjamin Jesty twenty years previously.”

Hadwen added:

“When Jenner first of all heard the story of the cow-pox legend that the dairymaids talked about, that if you only had cow-pox you can’t have small-pox, he began to mention it at the meetings of the Medico-Convivial Society, where the old doctors of the day met together to smoke their pipes, drink their glasses of grog, and talk over their cases. But he no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox, and Jenner found he would have to drop it.[2] [bold emphases added]

Yes, vaccination began with an utterly unscientific superstition, unbacked by any evidence at all and propagated by the local English dairymaids to one self-confident crank named Edward Jenner, a medical fraud who bought his credentials for fifteen pounds.

1801: First widespread experimentation with vaccines reputedly began. Jenner had successfully self-promoted and marketed his pseudo-medicine in spite of the overwhelming evidence against his foundational premise.

1802: Jenner petitioned the English parliament (House of Commons) for funding using blatant falsehoods, stating that vaccination can be done with perfect safety (where have we heard that before?) The English Government awarded Jenner 10,000 pounds for continued “experimentation.” (In his excellent book, The Horrors of Vaccination Exposed, Charles M. Higgins says it was 30,000 pounds, perhaps pertaining to Jenner’s 1807 triumphant petition which landed him further funds.) Jenner’s arm-to-arm method of vaccination ultimately proved so dangerous that it was abandoned and even prohibited. His claim of lifelong immunity was quickly exposed to be one of the more brazen pieces of self-promoting dishonesty medical “science” has ever produced. As vaccinated subjects continued to develop the diseases they were supposedly “immunized” against, this claim was modified to roughly 7 years protection with subsequent re-vaccination deemed “necessary.” By 1914 this “immunity” period was shortened yet again to an estimated 6-12 months (!), sharply exposing the lunacy of the vaccine paradigm to anyone paying attention. This is over 200 years ago and nothing much has changed.

Jenner’s original claims for vaccination were stated in his Petition to Parliament March 17, 1802, in which he asked for a reward for his alleged “discovery” — in these words [the bold text brackets are my interjections]:

“That your petitioner, having discovered [false: he got the idea came from the dairymaids of rural England] that a disease which occasionally exists in a particular form among cattle, known by the name of the cow-pox, admits of being inoculated on the human frame with the most perfect ease and safety [false: it proved time and again to be dangerous and not to prevent smallpox at all], and is attended with the singularly beneficial effect of rendering through life the person so inoculated perfectly secure from the infection of the smallpox [false: he claimed perfect immunity for lifebased on a mere few years of observation and no evidence at all — and people got cowpox AND smallpox!].[3]

Three strikes and you’re out, Ed! In his book, The Horrors of Vaccination Exposed,Charles M. Higgins referred to Jenner’s statement as a “tissue of falsehoods” — and so it was. That, however, did not prevent Jenner from collecting the sum of 30,000 pounds (a whopping sum at the time) from the British government as a reward for his imaginative fabrications.

In the following years, through to the 1900s, many cases of smallpox in those who had received the smallpox vaccine(s) continued to be recorded. In the early 1820s, while the British government was still funding Jenner’s “experiments,” he continued to do his best to hide the evidence showing his vaccines were causing more carnage than immunity. Pro-vaccinism became largely a face-saving exercise which has only swelled in scale (and funding) ever since.

A study of Edward Jenner is a study in modern medicine’s roots in charlatanry.

“The further I looked into it, the more shocked I became. I found that the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instance of these diseases, you will realize that this is not so.”

~ Archie Kalokerinos, AMM, MBBS, PhD, FAPM

The Smallpox Statistics We Were Meant to Forget

Many people are starting to catch on to the dangers inherent in vaccination, but too few realise at present that there is no shortage of instances where far more harm is done than presumed “good.” We venture right back to the beginning of the 20th century in England and find that there are similar numbers of vaccine-induced deaths abnd smallpox deaths, except in the case of children under 5 years of age, where the vaccine proved much riskier than smallpox itself. See below.[4]

Smallpox Deaths vs. Smallpox Vaccine Deaths — Data taken from Reports of the Registrar General of England
1906: smallpox deaths = 21, vaccine deaths = 29
1907: smallpox deaths = 10, vaccine deaths = 12
1908: smallpox deaths = 12, vaccine deaths = 13
1905-10: smallpox deaths total = 199, vaccine deaths = 99.
In children under 5 years: smallpox deaths = 26, deaths from vaccine = 98
1911-13: SP deaths = 42, vacc. Deaths = 31.
In children under 5 years, smallpox deaths = 8, deaths from vaccine = 30

Let’s not forget: 

1831: There was a smallpox outbreak in Wurtemberg, Germany, wherein 995 vaccinated people developed the disease.

1831: 2,000 people in Marseilles, France, who had received the smallpox vaccination, developed smallpox.

1854: England legislates for compulsory vaccination; widely opposed by eminent doctors of the day.

1857-59: Vaccination in England is now enforced, with fines for non-compliance, much to the disgust of rational medical men around the country who vigorously oppose it. Thus begins the smallpox epidemic of England, which lasts until 1859, killing over 14,000 people.

1854-63: Smallpox claimed over 33,000 lives by this point, following the introduction of a compulsory vaccination program.

1863-65: England’s second major epidemic strikes, claiming a further 20,059 lives.

1870-72: England’s third major epidemic claims 44,840 lives, the worst of the three, which occurred following compulsory vaccination.

1907: Compulsory vaccination laws were repealed. Their failure was too obvious to disguise or “spin” with the PR methods available at the time.

1910-33: During this period, in England and Wales combined, only 109 kids under the age of 5 years died of smallpox; 270 died from the vaccination. It is estimated there were around 40 million people in the UK in 1910. In reality, improved living conditions had all but wiped out smallpox, despite the vaccine-induced epidemics of prior decades.

Repeat after me: “Safe and effective, safe and effective…”

The City of Leicester: Sanitation Trumps Vaccination

“One of the medical profession’s greatest boasts is that it eradicated smallpox through the use of the smallpox vaccine. I myself believed this claim for many years. But it simply isn’t true. One of the worst smallpox epidemics of all time took place in England between 1870 and 1872 – nearly two decades after compulsory vaccination was introduced. After this evidence that smallpox vaccination didn’t work the people of Leicester in the English midlands refused to have the vaccine any more. When the next smallpox epidemic struck in the early 1890s the people of Leicester relied upon good sanitation and a system of quarantine. There was only one death from smallpox in Leicester during that epidemic. In contrast the citizens of other towns (who had been vaccinated) died in vast numbers… Doctors and drug companies may not like it but the truth is that surveillance, quarantine and better living conditions got rid of smallpox – not the smallpox vaccine.” – Dr. Vernon Coleman, MB

1914: Dr. C. Killick Millard, Medical Officer of Health (Leicester, England) published The Vaccination Question and admited that the city of Leicester, with a population of around 300,000 at the time, had for 30 years abandoned infant vaccination and yet “miraculously” experienced an “enormous decline” in smallpox mortality.

We should consider his words carefully: Millard was a man who at the outset was pro-vaccine, and yet — although the endless repetition of vaccine propaganda and dogma had definitely made an impression upon the collective mind by the 1900s — his empirical experience with the city of Leicester caused him to change his views. To quote Millard:

The two crucial and outstanding facts which I wish to lay stress upon, are:

  1. The unexpected and remarkable experience of the town of Leicester, which for thirty years has abandoned in­fantile vaccination, yet has shown an enormous decline in smallpox mortality.
  2. The fact that, although infantile vaccination is falling more and more into disuse throughout the whole country, yet smallpox, contrary to all pro-vaccinist expectation and prophecy, continues to decline and has almost disappeared.

… The striking facts that in Leicester, without infantile vaccination, the decline has been greater than in most places, and that throughout the country smallpox has continued to decrease in spite of the falling off in vaccination, should surely be sufficient grounds for legitimate doubt.

… If it can be shown that “sanitation”, thoroughly carried out, is alone sufficient for the effective control of smallpox in this country (as in Leicester), why inflict upon the commu­nity universal vaccination with all its inseparable drawbacks? Moreover, what justification can there be any longer for compulsion?

It cannot be denied that vaccination causes, in the aggregate, very considerable injury to health, most of it only temporary, but some permanent… We must never forget that vaccination is an evil… There is not the slightest evidence that vaccination, apart from its [presumed]effect in preventing smallpox, is of the least value or anything but detrimental to the human race… During the last decade, the deaths from vaccinia have several times outnumbered those from smallpox, whilst if we have regard to the amount of ill health caused by the two diseases (and putting aside for the moment the question of the alleged effect of vaccination in lessening smallpox) it looks as if vaccinia [vaccine-induced disease] were becoming, so far as the community is concerned, the more serious disease of the two.[5] [bold emphases added]

Below: Millard’s letter to the editor of the British Medical Journal, published February 20, 1915.

historical-vaccine-scandals-suppressed-by-medical-establishment-killicks-letter-to-the-british-medical-journal-1915

Vaccine Campaigns Were Always Known to Cause Outbreaks

In Compulsory Vaccination in England (1884), social reformer William Tebb observed:

“Vaccination was made compulsory by an Act of Parliament in the year 1853 ; again in 1867; and still more stringent in 1871. Since 1853, we have had three epidemics of small-pox, each being more severe than the one preceding.”

One quite well suppressed historical trend regarding vaccines is that serious outbreaks have a habit of occurring in the most heavily vaccinated areas and dodging less vaccinated areas. Only the most facile logic presupposes that those areas enduring outbreaks must have not followed vaccine procedure correctly, or had the misfortune of “bad batches,” etc. The logical conclusion to draw from the evidence is that the vaccine campaigns were actually creating epidemics where none were likely to ever occur. Eminent medical men recognised this in the 1800s — but did we listen?

While advocates argue correlation doesn’t equal causation (true enough), no independent investigator is satisfied with ignoring the mountains of evidence indicating causality, which date back to the very beginnings of vaccination. Big Pharma advocates of course can warn of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, but some of us extend our efforts end energies beyond mere fancy rhetoric — we also note that the correlation has a bi-directional effect, i.e., that disease incidence and mortality regularly increases in the wake of vaccination, and also regularly dropswith a corresponding decrease in vaccination rates. It goes both ways. Meaningless coincidence? Or worthy of controlled investigation?

historical-vaccine-scandals-suppressed-by-medical-establishment-anatomy-epidemics-smallpox-statistics-england-1857-1873

Above: Anatomy of 3 epidemics and the smallpox statistics from England for the period 1857-1873, spanning all three outbreaks.[6]

Notice the disproportionately high increases in smallpox mortality rates (above) as compared to population growth. Meanwhile, we remember that Leicester abandonedinfantile vaccination and eliminated smallpox simply by thoroughly enhancing sanitation methods. Today, our programmed fear of smallpox, flu, and other “dreaded” diseases is out of all proportion with reality, and shows that we have forgotten how potent basic, natural, common-sense measures can be in keeping a society healthy. It is also worth noting: Exposure doesn’t equal illness — the body’s internal terrain must also be conducive to the development of symptoms.

Below is a graph (also from Tebb’s book) showing that the mandating of the smallpox vaccination did not prevent the mortality rate from more than doublingwithin thirty years, while the population increased by only about one third.

historical-vaccine-scandals-suppressed-by-medical-establishment-tebb-smallpox-vaccination-mandate-vs-mortality

In summarising the origins of vaccine fraud, coverups, and the resultant pro-vaccine dogma, Jennifer Craig Ph.D states:

“The report of Dr. William Farr, (1807 – 1883), Compiler of Statistics of the Registrar General of London and considered to be the first developer of vital statistics, stated: “Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced. The mean annual mortality for 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of 2.04, whereas after compulsory vaccination, in 1871 the death rate was 10.24. In 1872 the death rate was 8.33 and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by legislative enactments.

“The compulsory vaccination law was repealed in 1907. By 1919, England and Wales had become one of the least vaccinated countries and had only 28 deaths from smallpox out of a population of 37.8 million people. According to official figures of the Registrar General of England, 109 children under five years in England and Wales died of smallpox between 1910 and 1933. In that same period 270 died from vaccination. Between 1934 and 1961 not one smallpox death was recorded but 115 children under five years died from smallpox vaccination.” [7] [bold emphases added]

Statistical Wizardry: When In Doubt, White it Out!

One of the lynch pins of the vaccine machine has always been systematic (and often high-level) deception in order to maintain the illusion of efficacy. Put bluntly, when things don’t pan out as the vaccinists want, they simply tinker with the data and play semantic games to create figures that seem to support a given vaccine program or goal. Sometimes, the tactic is more straightforward: gather the data and bin it so it never sees the light of day, as William Thompson has recently elucidated for us regarding the MMR scandal whereby the CDC knew of the MMR-autism link and deliberately buried the evidence — for some 14 years!

As Carolanne Wright explains:

The debate about vaccine safety did not truly take hold until a 1998 Lancet study was published by Andrew Wakefield, MD, which made a correlation between increased rates of autism in certain members of the population and the administration of the MMR vaccine. Over the next few years, several additional studies by different researchers also found a link. In response, the CDC performed their own study in 2001… a case controlled study, meaning that they did not look at any physical children… Their findings were published in the journal Pediatrics in 2004.

For many [people]following the vaccine-autism controversy, the CDC study conclusively closed the MMR vaccine debate… That is, until the lead researcher [Dr. William Thompson] came forward years later and revealed key documents associated with the study were destroyed, showing that there had been a massive manipulation of data and an intentional cover-up.

“I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information…” [said]Dr. William Thompson, former Centers for Disease Control (CDC) scientist and whistleblower.

Meanwhile, Dr. Andrew Wakefield was defamed, ostracized, chased out of England, and left to pick up the pieces of his life without a shred of evidence supporting the vindictive narrative created against him. Yet, while this is a prime example of vaccine fraud in the modern era, let’s re-focus on pre-WWII material and data, for an historical perspective that will be easy to digest…

Maurice Beddow Bayly, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, LRCP, wrote in 1934:

After vaccination was introduced, cases of aseptic meningitis were reported as a separate disease from polio, but such were counted as polio before the vaccine was introduced. The Ministry of Health admitted that the vaccine status of the individual is a guiding factor in diagnosis… If a person who is vaccinated contracts the disease, the disease is simply recorded under a different name… Those who contracted polio after the first inoculation were placed on the non-inoculated list… It’s obvious that this practice of screening statistics, apparently in order to suppress facts unfavourable to immunization, invalidates most of the evidence brought forward by the supporters of immunization.”[8] [bold emphasis added]

In short, when the numbers don’t support the vaccination dogma, medical authorities simply change them to suit the purposes of their business. Considering the embarrassingly large sums of money that governments have invested in vaccine campaigns (and the attendant propaganda/psychological warfare), it is somewhat understandable that, in their cowardly bureaucratic state of mind, rather than admit to such monstrous mistakes which have generated such incomprehensible human suffering, said bureaucrats and medical stooges simply try to hide the evidence and save face. (There is of course the malignant influence of Big Pharma and its greed lurking in the background too.)

I will elaborate on this statistical fraud theme with more recent examples in my follow up article, 5 Modern Vaccine Scandals. For now, let’s continue our historical perspective…

After Jenner’s death, when vaccinated people continued to contract smallpox (repeatedly proving the fraud of the smallpox vaccine) their medical records showed they had “pustular eczema” instead.[9] George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950) recalled seeing this data-recording fraud firsthand:

“During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borrough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the revaccinated cases (of smallpox) as pustular eczema, varioloid or what not — [anything]except smallpox.” [10] [bold emphasis added]

Instead of admitting the dangerous and ineffectual nature of the earliest vaccines, however, authorities plowed ahead creating more and more vaccines, all on the same superstitious premises that gave birth to the mythology now rammed down our throats as “science”. But the fact remains that medical authorities have been lying and covering their tracks all along, just as Edward Jenner, the godfather of the vaccine lie, did right from the start.

So vaccines are safe and effective are they? Is that why after Japan started compulsory smallpox vaccination in 1872 smallpox rates increased thereafter? After twenty years, their records indicated 165,774 cases with 29,979 deaths — ALL of them vaccinated. Meanwhile, in Australia, where there was no such compulsion to vaccinate, there were only three deaths in fifteen years.[11]

Clearly we are protecting ourselves from these diseases somehow, and it starts with the basics — nutritionsanitation and hygiene — which prevent disease by removing the cause of disease transmission. Historically, smallpox continued to infect Europe’s population until plumbing infrastructure became commonplace. When the Roman Empire crumbled, sanitation became a lost art and the society paid the price: plague after plague struck areas of dense population.

“There is no question that perfect sanitation has almost obliterated the disease [smallpox], and sooner or later will dispose of it entirely. Of course, when that time comes, in all probability the credit will be given to vaccination.” ~ John Tilden, M.D. (1951-1940)

I could go on and on with stats and examples, but hopefully you get the idea. Those of you inclined to object to my “fixation” on smallpox while I lay out some basic historical context for vaccination are encouraged to wait for my follow up article — 5 Modern Vaccine Scandals — for a more “inclusive” discussion of recent material. For more information in the meantime, please see: How Plumbing (Not Vaccines) Eradicated Disease and Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics.

vaccine-failures-continue-where-there-is-risk-there-must-be-choice1

In summarising the origins of vaccine fraud, coverups, and the resultant pro-vaccine dogma, Jennifer Craig Ph.D states:

“The report of Dr. William Farr, (1807 – 1883), Compiler of Statistics of the Registrar General of London and considered to be the first developer of vital statistics, stated: “Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced. The mean annual mortality for 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of 2.04, whereas after compulsory vaccination, in 1871 the death rate was 10.24. In 1872 the death rate was 8.33 and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by legislative enactments.

“The compulsory vaccination law was repealed in 1907. By 1919, England and Wales had become one of the least vaccinated countries and had only 28 deaths from smallpox out of a population of 37.8 million people. According to official figures of the Registrar General of England, 109 children under five years in England and Wales died of smallpox between 1910 and 1933. In that same period 270 died from vaccination. Between 1934 and 1961 not one smallpox death was recorded but 115 children under five years died from smallpox vaccination.” [7] [bold emphases added]

Statistical Wizardry: When In Doubt, White it Out!

One of the lynch pins of the vaccine machine has always been systematic (and often high-level) deception in order to maintain the illusion of efficacy. Put bluntly, when things don’t pan out as the vaccinists want, they simply tinker with the data and play semantic games to create figures that seem to support a given vaccine program or goal. Sometimes, the tactic is more straightforward: gather the data and bin it so it never sees the light of day, as William Thompson has recently elucidated for us regarding the MMR scandal whereby the CDC knew of the MMR-autism link and deliberately buried the evidence — for some 14 years!

As Carolanne Wright explains:

The debate about vaccine safety did not truly take hold until a 1998 Lancet study was published by Andrew Wakefield, MD, which made a correlation between increased rates of autism in certain members of the population and the administration of the MMR vaccine. Over the next few years, several additional studies by different researchers also found a link. In response, the CDC performed their own study in 2001… a case controlled study, meaning that they did not look at any physical children… Their findings were published in the journal Pediatrics in 2004.

For many [people]following the vaccine-autism controversy, the CDC study conclusively closed the MMR vaccine debate… That is, until the lead researcher [Dr. William Thompson] came forward years later and revealed key documents associated with the study were destroyed, showing that there had been a massive manipulation of data and an intentional cover-up.

“I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information…” [said]Dr. William Thompson, former Centers for Disease Control (CDC) scientist and whistleblower.

Meanwhile, Dr. Andrew Wakefield was defamed, ostracized, chased out of England, and left to pick up the pieces of his life without a shred of evidence supporting the vindictive narrative created against him. Yet, while this is a prime example of vaccine fraud in the modern era, let’s re-focus on pre-WWII material and data, for an historical perspective that will be easy to digest…

Maurice Beddow Bayly, member of the Royal College of Surgeons, LRCP, wrote in 1934:

After vaccination was introduced, cases of aseptic meningitis were reported as a separate disease from polio, but such were counted as polio before the vaccine was introduced. The Ministry of Health admitted that the vaccine status of the individual is a guiding factor in diagnosis… If a person who is vaccinated contracts the disease, the disease is simply recorded under a different name… Those who contracted polio after the first inoculation were placed on the non-inoculated list… It’s obvious that this practice of screening statistics, apparently in order to suppress facts unfavourable to immunization, invalidates most of the evidence brought forward by the supporters of immunization.”[8] [bold emphasis added]

In short, when the numbers don’t support the vaccination dogma, medical authorities simply change them to suit the purposes of their business. Considering the embarrassingly large sums of money that governments have invested in vaccine campaigns (and the attendant propaganda/psychological warfare), it is somewhat understandable that, in their cowardly bureaucratic state of mind, rather than admit to such monstrous mistakes which have generated such incomprehensible human suffering, said bureaucrats and medical stooges simply try to hide the evidence and save face. (There is of course the malignant influence of Big Pharma and its greed lurking in the background too.)

I will elaborate on this statistical fraud theme with more recent examples in my follow up article, 5 Modern Vaccine Scandals. For now, let’s continue our historical perspective…

After Jenner’s death, when vaccinated people continued to contract smallpox (repeatedly proving the fraud of the smallpox vaccine) their medical records showed they had “pustular eczema” instead.[9] George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950) recalled seeing this data-recording fraud firsthand:

“During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borrough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the revaccinated cases (of smallpox) as pustular eczema, varioloid or what not — [anything]except smallpox.” [10] [bold emphasis added]

Instead of admitting the dangerous and ineffectual nature of the earliest vaccines, however, authorities plowed ahead creating more and more vaccines, all on the same superstitious premises that gave birth to the mythology now rammed down our throats as “science”. But the fact remains that medical authorities have been lying and covering their tracks all along, just as Edward Jenner, the godfather of the vaccine lie, did right from the start.

So vaccines are safe and effective are they? Is that why after Japan started compulsory smallpox vaccination in 1872 smallpox rates increased thereafter? After twenty years, their records indicated 165,774 cases with 29,979 deaths — ALL of them vaccinated. Meanwhile, in Australia, where there was no such compulsion to vaccinate, there were only three deaths in fifteen years.[11]

Clearly we are protecting ourselves from these diseases somehow, and it starts with the basics — nutritionsanitation and hygiene — which prevent disease by removing the cause of disease transmission. Historically, smallpox continued to infect Europe’s population until plumbing infrastructure became commonplace. When the Roman Empire crumbled, sanitation became a lost art and the society paid the price: plague after plague struck areas of dense population.

“There is no question that perfect sanitation has almost obliterated the disease [smallpox], and sooner or later will dispose of it entirely. Of course, when that time comes, in all probability the credit will be given to vaccination.” ~ John Tilden, M.D. (1951-1940)

I could go on and on with stats and examples, but hopefully you get the idea. Those of you inclined to object to my “fixation” on smallpox while I lay out some basic historical context for vaccination are encouraged to wait for my follow up article — 5 Modern Vaccine Scandals — for a more “inclusive” discussion of recent material. For more information in the meantime, please see: How Plumbing (Not Vaccines) Eradicated Disease and Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics.

historical-vaccine-scandals-suppressed-medical-establishment-bexsero-meningitidis-1

Even more alarming, the manufacturer has stated that the safety and effectiveness of this vaccine have not even been established in children under 10 years of age. Yet this vaccine is regularly administered to infants — a time in a child’s development when adverse reactions can be most difficult to measure.

historical-vaccine-scandals-suppressed-medical-establishment-bexsero-meningitidis-2-768x302

Why has the UK government decided to advocate the vaccination of babies as young as two months of age, with a vaccine that is not believed to be safe or effective for infants? Clearly, there remain conflicts-of-interest in vaccination approval, regulation and promotion processes. Moreover, the corporations that manufacture vaccines are protected by law from being sued for damages when their product causes harm (the disastrous Gardasil vaccine is a prime example), private health insurance companies will not insure you and your family against the potential of vaccine damage. This means that, with so few (if any) safe-guards in place to protect consumers, vaccination is in fact an uninsurable risk — and now, in an increasing number of legal jurisdictions, it is a mandatory one.

Our collective ignorance is the best weapon the Establishment has to coerce and cajole us into a forced vaccination agenda. Thus far, as we have let our egos get in the way of learning the truth, and it is primarily our children who have paid for our ignorance. And if the forced vaccination agenda succeeds, we will all pay the price.

Knowledge is power — but vaccine slogans are not knowledge. Propaganda is not wisdom. Groupthink is not a sound basis for epistemology. Truth is not nearly so well-funded as profitable lies, and the peer-review system is broken. Remember to ask “who benefits?”

We can change this if we want. What are we choosing to create from here? Have we had enough of these vaccine scandals?

Stay tuned for my follow-up article, 5 Modern Vaccine Scandals.

Endnotes:

  1. Dr Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, 1896
  2. Ibid.
  3. See History and Pathology of Vaccination, by Dr. Edgar M. Crookshank, London, 1889, p 173, Vol. I.
  4. Charles M. Higgins, Horrors of Vaccination, page 23, 1920.
  5. Ibid., Higgins.
  6. W. Tebb, Compulsory Vaccination in England, 1884, http://whale.to/v/tebb1/comp.html
  7. Jennifer Craig, BSN, MA, Ph.D, Smallpox Vaccine: Origins of Vaccine Madness, February 26, 2010, http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2010/02/26/smallpox-vaccine-origins-of-vaccine-madness/
  8. Maurice Beddow Bayly, The Case Against Vaccination, 1934.
  9. Op. cit. Craig.
  10. Walene James, Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth
  11. Ibid., 41.
  12. Anne Riley Hale, The Medical VooDoo, 1935.
  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Health Interview Survey, 2015, www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/new-government-survey-pegs-autism-prevalence-1-45

About the author:

Critically acclaimed author and co-founder of Global Freedom Movement, Brendan D. Murphy is a leading expositor of the new paradigm of integrated science and spirituality/sovereignty. He is a passionate advocate of accelerated conscious evolution through sound-based DNA/kundalini activation and intentional harnessing of the life-supporting (negentropic) aetheric forces of consciousness, while also having experience in psychoenergetic and belief change modalities.

For Brendan, compassionately hacking the Matrix is more than just sport, it’s a way of life. He lives and breathes it, taking a stand for truth and beckoning others to join him on the path of informed, compassionate, and courageous living. Understanding that the outer world always holographically reflects the inner, Brendan believes idle research and information absorption is not enough — we must embody our ideals now and transmute knowledge into wisdom through willful and gutsy application.

“Enough of the slave species legacy we’ve been playing out for millennia! It’s time to rediscover sovereignty, infinite consciousness and our multi-dimensional selves. Evolution is calling. Will we answer?”

Connect with Brendan at:

The Grand Illusion

the-grand-illusion-a-synthesis-of-science-and-spirituality-200x300Did you know that modern neuroscience considers the brain as a receiver of consciousness rather than the generator of it?

Brendan D. Murphy’s book “The Grand Illusion : a Synthesis of Science & Spirituality” synthesizes the paranormal with today’s hard science, breaking through the outmoded world-view that we are just powerless little “meat computers”. Here, new and expansive vistas of possibility are laid bare, and the forces and energies produced by our consciousness that act on the world around us are blown open for your understanding.

Get ready for an introduction to the mysterious “fifth force” known to science – a “carrier wave” of consciousness that can travel at speeds far exceeding light. With the knowledge that we are incredible and immortal spiritual beings temporarily inhabiting a dream-like, multidimensional, holographic reality, we can indeed begin to turn life on this planet – which, for many, is a virtual nightmare – into The Grand Illusion.

Are you ready to meet yourself? “The Grand Illusion: a Synthesis of Science & Spirituality” is available atBrendanDMurphy.net and Amazon/The Grand Illusion.

Source: Global Freedom Movement

“Canadian Flu Vaccine Paradox” Admits Vaccines Are Causing More Illness

Heather Callaghan

Activist Post

Canadian mainstream media has taken a bold new step – admitting the problem that frequent vaccines are creating a cascade of more illnesses. And not just a greater number and frequency of illnesses but even lower protection against the very diseases the vaccines were supposed to protect against.

CBC News reports that it was originally called “the Canadian problem” – i.e. the problem of higher risk of pandemic flu illnesses among those who get the seasonal flu shot the previous year, or those who get frequent flu shots. They note that the problem is now seen in other countries such as Hong Kong, Japan and the U.S.

From CBC News:

People who receive flu vaccines year after year can sometimes show reduced protection, an effect that Canadian infectious disease specialists say muddies public health messages for annual flu vaccine campaigns.

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, researchers at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control originally thought seasonal flu shots from 2008 might offer extra protection against the new pandemic strain. They were puzzled to find instead, seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu.

Dr. Danuta Skowronski and her colleagues really put this to the test. Aside from their initial conclusion they did five more studies last summer that showed the same results in people – and ferrets. They test on ferrets which, for some reason, are the best flu model in animal studies.

She said:

This was a unique finding in a unique context of dramatically mismatched vaccine to novel pandemic influenza virus.

They claim that part of the paradox is that a greater risk of H1N1 infection only happened during the pandemic. Pharmaceutical companies and the larger medical community absolutely don’t want studies conducted that compare the health of unvaccinated individuals to those who get regular vaccines – even when they find a troubling “paradox.” Yet, this story showing the results of seasonal flu vaccines can already show a link to unintended consequences. They say since building more sensitive immune testing equipment, that they haven’t seen increase in (seasonal?) flu illnesses among vaccine recipients versus unvaccinated individuals.

They are dubbing it a “blunted protection to seasonal flu.” From CBC:

But researchers in several countries have found a blunting or “interference” effect between previous seasonal vaccines and reduced levels of vaccine protection in later years for some strains.

What?? If vaccines are supposed to “immunize” or give the immune system a boost, and the CDC in the U.S. is telling everyone to go ahead and get ineffective flu vaccines for added protection – then how can past vaccines run “interference” and knock out the effects of future vaccines? This attempt at damage control doesn’t make any sense….

Additionally, in the very same sentence saying flu shots offer protection for flu viruses that require medical care, regardless of vaccine history, CBC mentions a Clincial Infectious Diseases journal study that concludes: …vaccine-induced protection was greatest for individuals not vaccinated during the prior 5 years. Wait a second, if everyone must go out and get jabbed for “herd immunity,” then why is the best protection enjoyed by practical vaccine virgins? Could it be that they still have working immune systems?

Do they even understand what’s going on?

Dr. Michael Gardam, director of infection prevention and control at Toronto’s University Health Network said:

People do not have a good explanation for why.

And,

The idea basically is that your immune system is occupied elsewhere. It would be like getting the swirling ball of death on your Mac where your operating system is doing something else rather than opening the file.

CBC says, “The end result of both puzzles is the same: more sickness.” The journal study author said there is a need to think about a person’s vaccination history when trying to gauge its effectiveness. (But I thought all vaccines were supposed to be effective for all people, all the time…)

Coincidentally – ahem – the solution to this vaccine-created problem is a universal one-time vaccine to be trialed soon… There you have it, it’s safe to admit the problems people were already noticing when the patented solution is almost a go-go.

Incredibly, Gardam actually added:

We have kind of hyped this vaccine so much for so long we are starting to believe our own hype. Really, what we should be doing is looking for better vaccines,

But I thought vaccines were the solution to disease this whole time, and now they are defunct and something better is needed? It is such convenient timing that the inefficacy of seasonal vaccines can be admitted now that the universal one-time flu vaccine is nearly complete. After years of hearing about the science and studies backing the safety and effectiveness of vaccines – this problem obviously “went under the radar” and will feel like a punch to the face to those who will set aside the hype.

CBC:

In the meantime, public health officials who aim to protect people from flu complications need to grapple with the imperfections of a vaccine given every year to a moving target of strains.

[See: Flu vaccine only 23% effective in U.S., even less effective in Canada, where it says this year’s flu vaccine “works best” in young, healthy people. (*sigh*)]

Also incredibly, Skowronski who also anticipates the universal vaccine, still says to go for the seasonal vaccines, especially in people who run the high risk of hospitalization or death. That would be the elderly; elderly in nursing homes. Elderly in nursing homes who get vaccines. CBC draws one last breath to say that Public Health Agency of Canada noticed widespread flu activity across Canada last week including large numbers in………long-term care homes.

The report, if nothing else, shows a lack of understanding (or deception) in regards to the medical community pandering frequent one-size-fits-all injections for everyone without knowing or caring about the long-term biological effects. They don’t have answers for the “why’s?” It shows that we often find something out the hard way after already living with the results.

It is doubtful that the people experiencing multiple illnesses after dutiful vaccinations appreciate this bleak revelation – this “oops” of a test run on their health.  

People who have stopped vaccinating do so after researching for themselves the safety claims, efficacy claims, ingredients and historical disease rates. They empower themselves both by removing the curtain that contains the wizard to see for themselves and by taking steps to boost their own health. Please don’t take my word for it – visit the research links below and branch out from there to see what resonates with you.

Resources:
The Influenza Deception
The Antibody Deception
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History
The Toxic Placebo Effect of Vaccines
Vaccination Voodoo: What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines
The Problem with Pro-Vaccine Propaganda
Saying No to Vaccines: A Resource Guide for All Ages

Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com and ActivistPost.com. Like at Facebook.