Source: Discerning The Mystery
The breaking reports of an alleged serial bomber swept through corporate news with blinding speed, and just as always with such sensational news, the reports of these events held numerous unanswered questions and many gross inconsistencies.
During this time, news of this series of seemingly fake pipe bombs mailed to various public figures who actively opposed President Trump (most of whom have encouraged violence themselves) was a major topic of discussion. However, not long after these news reports broke, the blatant errors in these stories began to surface. Upon closer examination, the reports of this supposed bomber showed little to no sign of consistency.
This is the second part of the two-part series about Q Anon and the possible involvement of black ops and the Alliance in the recent case of Cesar Sayoc, now known as the fake bomber. In this article, we discuss further anomalies within the various news reports about Sayoc as well as the probable purpose behind these reports. We also explore the numerous possibilities of how these events play out in the world of U.S. intelligence and how these developments may spell ultimate victory for the Alliance.
The recent breaking news of a series of suspicious packages which were claimed to be bombs initially swept through the MSM in record time. These stories were dotted with the usual telltale signs of shifting narratives, conflicting details, apparent political motivation, and numerous other indicators of possible deception by the MSM. On top of these questionable characteristics, reports of these events appeared to be intended to smear the image of alternative media and independent thinkers in general (not to mention the United States president).
The topic of the anonymous 8Chan poster, QAnon, as well as those that follow Q have been covered in mainstream media with greater and greater normalcy—to the surprise of many. Though this subject has been used to target and smear alternative communities due to their support for the president, it is interesting to see that subjects which used to only be discussed among independent researchers are gaining public attention from the MSM.
It also appears that Q Anon and alternative communities have become a specific focus of certain intelligence operations. In past years, these communities have been largely disregarded and assumed to be full of “conspiracy nuts.” Consequently, there was apparently no need for intelligence communities to take much active interest in them—at least not at the public level. However, it now seems that questionable interests within U.S. intelligence are working to undermine the efforts of these alternative communities—censoring, disrupting, and dissuading members from finding the truth.
Ironically, it has been these very communities that have worked to uncover the possible hidden truths behind these recent events involving the fake bomber, Cesar Altieri Sayoc, or as alternative communities have dubbed him, Cesar Psy-Op.
The Case for a False Flag
Following the alleged false flag attacks of September 11, most suspected false flags occurring within the U.S. appeared to have been poorly concocted and executed. Though it does appear that there were actual victims involved in many of these attacks and that real deaths did occur, there appear to have been a consistent trend of clumsiness and poorly executed cover-up attempts which commonly accompany these events.
Many of the stories of more recent attacks suspected to be false flags were so wrought with inconsistencies that most independent researchers were easily able to dissect and uncover the truth behind them. Such inconsistencies can be easily seen in a number of past events. In fact, these questionable characteristics have been so consistent that they have become key indicators among researchers on how to determine true violent events from false ones.
In the case of this fake bomb event, not only do we see a good number of these inconsistencies, but we see a significant number of outright lies included within MSM news reports. One example of these apparent untruths can be seen in the following report from the New York Post. This report clearly states that one of the packages was “mailed” to one of the targets, and yet there is no sign that the package was ever mailed at all.
A single fingerprint on a suspicious package mailed to Rep. Maxine Waters helped authorities nab the man who allegedly sent at least 13 suspected pipe bombs to high-profile Democratic figures over the past week, officials said Friday.
“Once I knew that they had a print, I was pretty confident we’d be able to find the right person,” FBI director Chris Wray said at a press conference.
Investigators also found a possible DNA connection between samples on two separate IEDs and material collected from suspect Cesar Sayoc in a previous arrest in Florida, Wray added.
Sayoc, 56, was arrested in Plantation, Florida, earlier Friday and was charged with five federal crimes — including interstate transportation of an explosive, illegal mailing of explosives and threats against former presidents, officials said.
Neither this nor any other reports from the New York Post offered images of the packages they claim were mailed to California State Rep., Maxine Waters. However, an internet search easily yielded the following images.
These are a few of the images which corporate media presented of the alleged bombs that were sent to a number of political and public figures. What seems striking is the fact that we are seeing images of these supposed “bombs” in the first place. If these objects were actually believed to be dangerous, why would anyone in their right mind set them up for a photo shoot when these people should be running out of the building as the bomb squad is being called?
For anyone to present images of a package they claim to be a bomb seems to suggest that either they are suicidal and don’t care about their own safety, or they know the object is not a real bomb and they are simply presenting it to news cameras for shock value. When was the last time you saw photos included with reports of an actual bomb in corporate news?
|This is a comparison between the price of stamps and that of flat rate envelopes similar to those depicted in the images.
AAA Digest of Motor Laws – Florida – Windshield Stickers
No person shall drive any motor vehicle with any sign, poster, or other non-transparent material upon the front windshield, sidewings, or side or rear windows of such vehicle which materially obstructs, obscures, or impairs the Driver’s clear view of the highway or any intersecting highway.
Exempts GPS devices or similar satellite receiver devices.
Consider the convenience of each of these images (below). What are the chances that this van—or any other vehicle, for that matter—would be able to be so clearly photographed as though Cesar was posing for the camera? It seems unusual for a man intelligent enough to be a serial bomber to be so friendly with photographers with high-quality photo equipment before committing his crime.
We might also wonder what the chances are that this same individual would be so clearly visible at a Trump rally facing another high-quality camera and photographer smiling with his “Welcome President Trump” sign in perfect view. It appears as though Cesar is posing for the camera and yet is not interacting with anyone in the crowd.
One additional detail we might consider is the fact that the stickers on the van’s rear window appear to have changed at some point. Notice the difference in the arrangement of stickers between the YouTube video and the still images.
When we consider the possible reasoning behind this strange media spectacle of the apparently fake bomber, a number of questions arise. Was this act perpetrated by a covert intelligence agency such as the FBI in order to achieve some deceptive purpose? Was this an operation designed by White Hats behind the scenes in order to send a message of some kind, or is there much more to this story than we have conjectured thus far?
Some claim that this non-bombing event represented an actual threat to certain officials on the political left (but not through fake bombs). This was allegedly because these interests were involved with the Cabal, and possibly because they were known by White Hats to be planning some very destructive events in the near future—events which would have occurred unless someone intervened.
A Hit Job on Soros?
Alternatively, this entire operation may have been an elaborate attempt to either capture or to kill George Soros. If this was the case, it would explain why Soros was the first person to reportedly receive a package, though he was not reported to be home at the time the package arrived. It may also explain why the caravan/invasion march—a clearly unnatural and societally hazardous situation—is occurring at this exact time.
As we may know, the collapse of the Roman Empire occurred primarily due to the deliberate overflow of foreigners into the empire by outside invaders. The system was unable to sustain such a sudden and excessive growth in population, and according to research, this may have been the intention.
If it was Soros’s intent to deliver a death blow to Western society, this invasion from the South would represent an extreme accelerated version of that plan. This may mean that in funding such as extreme project, Soros was playing his endgame, which either meant that his back was to the wall, or that he felt his death was imminent.
More than One Purpose
We might consider the likelihood that the Alliance actually used the reports of “bombs” as an excuse to flood various key locations with dozens of police and investigative equipment for reasons other than actual bomb retrieval. If all of these authorities showed up and combed the entire areas within and around the estate of the Clintons, former President Obama, Maxine Waters, George Soros, the headquarters of CNN and did not take the opportunity to look for incriminating evidence, I would be very surprised.